Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“Our current system for dealing with these quality of life issues is, from my perspective, abjectly ineffective,” he said. “It’s ineffective for you, and it’s ineffective for the person that you have to step over on the street corner.”
As early as March, Newsom said he hopes to have two initiatives in progress.
The first would involve the formation of a “Community Court” that would initially only focus on the crimes associated with public drunkenness.
Although San Francisco police issue citations for such crimes as aggressive panhandling or drinking in public, those cases are not being adjudicated by the courts.
“Nothing happens,” Newsom said. “They’re being thrown out. We’re going to stop that.”
The second part will create an “alcohol impact area” in the Tenderloin that will restrict the sale of alcohol between the hours of 6 and 9 a.m. and bar the sale of single containers of high-alcohol products.
Newsom, who was elected into office three years ago on a pledge to reduce the number of homeless plaguing The City’s streets, said the two-prong plan is the next strategy in his homelessness plan that began with reducing the amount of cash homeless individuals receive and moving chronically homeless into apartments.
There were 5,642 homeless people living in San Francisco in 2004, according to a city count, although advocates for the homeless say the number is much higher — as many as 12,000. Since January 2004, San Francisco has placed 2,590 formerly homeless individuals into permanent housing, according to city data. Most recently, Newsom directed city staff to remove homeless encampments from Golden Gate Park while also offering housing and services to those people removed from the park area.
The City has failed to deal with the crime and the “chronic behavioral health issues” associated with the alcohol and substance abuse that often comes with homelessness, Newsom said.
San Francisco officials are looking to similar municipal programs in New York, San Diego and Washington state, according Newsom.
San Francisco officials are also looking at adopting elements of San Diego’s Serial Inebriate Program and New York City’s Community Court system. Last week, representatives from numerous city agencies — including the Mayor’s Office, the Department of Public Health, the District Attorney’s Office, Public Defender’s Office and the Department of Human Services — traveled to New York to learn about that city’s system.
“The models are treatment as the carrot, and the stick looming behind that is incarceration,” said Trent Rhorer, executive director of the city Department of Human Services.



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:14 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Fenty announces a new plan for housing the homeless in D.C."
Report as inappropriate
5:47 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Fenty announces a new plan for housing the homeless in D.C."
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Or, here's a thought. How about stop making the homeless a trendy political cause and instead refocus limited resources on actually helping them? There is NO reason to demand that homeless shelters be built on the most expensive real estate in town. It'd be a FAR better use of our limited resources to develop these downtown sights to their highest use (probably very expensive office space), and use the never-ending revenue stream from that to fund truly comprehensive shelters and facilities on less expensive real estate. While we are at it, we need to start demanding that the burbs take their share of the burden. So take your pick. You can have homeless shelters on the most expensive real estate in town, primarily to keep them visible for political reasons (and apparently to give them stunning city views), or you can use those resources wisely to actually help the homeless. You can't do both.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How about Fenty's promise that Franklin Shelter would be kept open unless an alternative site was located, in the downtown area, with a 1 for 1 bed replacement? I'm all for supportive housing, but unfortunately, the number of units of supportive housing being established pales in comparison to the number of homeless folks in the District. Therefore, emergency shelters are still necessary. Instead of having a new shelter on Georgia Avenue, a reopened Gales School Shelter (as was promised when it was closed), and the Franklin Shelter, we instead now will have, if Fenty has his way, a reopened Gales School, and 50 units of permanent supportive housing. Does this really sound like a plan to end homelessness via supportive housing, or a plan to end homelessness by giving the poor in DC no place to go?
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree