Parties go after foes with ready-made Web sites
Many candidates running for Senate this year got one more Web site bearing their name than they bargained for.
Witness BobsBaggage.com, CluelessClaire.com and FancyFord.com, all produced by the National Republican Senatorial Committee to lampoon, respectively, Democratic Senate candidates Bob Menendez, New Jersey; Claire McCaskill, Missouri; and Harold Ford Jr., Tennessee.
Bobsbaggage.com claims that Menendez “brings more baggage to Washington with him than a hotel bellhop,” while Fancyford.com hits Ford for his “couture suits” and “parties with Playboy playmates.” CluelessClaire.com goes after McCaskill for being, well, “clueless.”
Also designed by the NRSC: PedersonsLiberalExpress.com, which targets Arizona candidate Jim Pederson; FarOutBrown.com, to highlight the “liberal record” of Ohioan Sherrod Brown; and SpinningAWebb.com, on Virginia candidate Jim Webb’s “scary record.” TicTacTester.com lets visitors play Tic-Tac-Toe with questions on candidate John Tester in Montana. And Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., gets not one but two spoof sites: MerciDebbie.com to highlight what Republicans call view as her fealty to Canada, and XieXieDebbie.com, to make the same point about China.
NRSC spokesman Brian Nick said, “This is by far the most work we’ve put into producing the different Web sites and their content and creativity.”
“It’s a great medium to drive attention” to the opposition's failings, he said.
Not that his own candidates are immune. In New Jersey, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee goes after Menendez’s opponent Tom Kean Jr., the son of former New Jersey governor and 9/11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean, with www.toojuniorforjersey.com, a site that prominently displays a fraternity paddle and a frat house emblazoned with the letters “GOP.”
Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz., gets hit with DoubleTalkExpress.com, while the DSCC takes all GOPers to task with the FudgeReport.net, a spoof on the Drudge Report.
The Webb campaign bought GeorgesJourneys.com to highlight Sen. George Allen’s, R-Va., early campaign trips to primary states such as Iowa and New Hampshire.
Even state parties have gotten into the act, too. Montana Democrats created www.buyingburns.com, to highlight Sen. Conrad Burns’ ties to corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Maryland Dems check in with www.therealsteele.com, which displays a photo of Lt. Gov. Michael Steele with President Bush.
We can only assume all the URL’s will be available for purchase after Election Day.
George Will’s son interviews with Nats
One of Washington’s biggest sports fans soon may have a view from the inside.
Jonathan Will, son of columnist and baseball-mad pundit George Will, can often be seen in the stands of our stadiums and arenas rooting on the local side.
Speaking Wednesday before the Alzheimer’s Association, George Will said his son has season tickets to “the Redskins, the Wizards, the Capitals, the Orioles and the Nationals.”
And the proud papa said he was about to drive Jonathan that afternoon to RFK “to be interviewed for a job working for the Nationals.”
George Will was receiving the association’s annual Monument Award along with Eunice Kennedy Shriver and her husband, Sargent Shriver. But he was paying tribute to Eunice for another area of her charity — her work with the mentally handicapped through the Special Olympics and Best Buddies.
Jonathan Will, 34, is mentally disabled. George Will said when his son was born, the doctor asked whether he and his wife “wanted to take Jonathan home.”
“That was an askable question in 1972, and that that question is no longer askable is attributable to Eunice Shriver more than anyone else.”
So much for party differences.
Coulter picks conservative chicks
After Yeas & Nays shared with you Wednesday the news of the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute’s 2007 pinup calendar of “Great American Conservative Women,” we got in touch with Miss December herself, Ann Coulter, in order to see just how honored she was.
Coulter admitted that she was flattered, but she also felt that lots of other conservative women could just have easily made the list.
“Phyllis Schafly is the greatest conservative woman of our time, bar none,” Coulter said. “And the magnificent Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio, stood up alone against blowhard John Murtha, for which she deserves the thanks of our nation.” Schmidt famously branded Murtha, a Marine veteran, a coward on the House floor after he called for pulling out of Iraq.
Coulter went on to single out such other female conservative champs as Condoleezza Rice, Margaret Thatcher, Peggy Noonan, Fawn Hall, Tammy Bruce, Kellyanne Fitzpatrick Conway and Barret Swatek.
“There is no shortage of hot right-wing women for Clare Booth Luce Institute’s calendars,” Coulter reminded us.
But is the partisan Coulter willing to concede that there might also be a hot Democratic woman? Absolutely!
“John Kerry,” Coulter said.
Parties in role reversal, says Dem strategist
Democratic consultant Peter Fenn sees history being stood on its head in this campaign season.
Speaking Tuesday at a panel sponsored by The George Washington University, he said, “Democrats are in the position of agreeing with [former Republican Speaker] Newt Gingrich,” in that they’re asking voters if they’ve “had enough.”
By contrast, “Republicans seem to like [former Democratic Speaker] Tip O’Neill’s slogan that all politics is local.
“That’s quite a switch now.”
Think tank
On Election Day, which state’s Republican Party will be most in need of a stiff drink to numb the pain?
“The Republican Party will need champagne to celebrate its surprise victories. The pundits and pollsters will need a stiff drink to dull the pain of their bad predictions.”
– Ron Nessen, The Brookings Institution
“Ah ha, it’s looking like it will take quite a few stiff drinks to numb the pain in Ohio and Pennsylvania, and may I suggest 151 proof rum with several strong shots of bitters. But wait, forget the states. What’s Karl Rove’s address?”
– Carol Joynt, Nathans of Georgetown
“Ohio, but one drink will not be enough. They’ll need an entire liquor cabinet.”
– Frank Luntz, Luntz Research Companies



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate