You are here: Los Angeles Opinion

California News

Multimedia News


Slideshow: Female sluggers on the court and stump

LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...
Sexiest men alive
20 photos
In this July 25, 2008 file photo, San Diego C...
Bush Pained by Economic Anxiety
Bush: Uncertainty, Fear Driving Markets
LIVE 10:25 ET: President Bush on the Economy
Asian Markets Tumble During Friday Trading

Robert Cox: Anti-partisan Lieberman may be on to something

CommentsComment on this article
Aug 15, 2006 2:00 AM (787 days ago) by Robert Cox, The Examiner
This story ranks # 2,177 of 7,601
Related Topics: WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - When I left New York last week for a family vacation in Southern California, Sen. Joe Lieberman had just lost the Democratic primary in Connecticut and was preparing for his first day as an independent candidate for higher office.

In his Tuesday night speech, Lieberman, both conceding defeat and launching a new campaign for the U.S. Senate, decried the “old politics of partisan polarization” and said, “I went into public service to find solutions, not to point fingers. To unite, not to divide.”

Lieberman went on to describe a political environment within his own party in that “Every disagreement is considered disloyal. And every opponent it is not just an opponent but is seen as evil.” He vowed to continue fighting for stronger national security and work with Democrats and Republicans to “build a better life for the people of Connecticut ... regardless of what the political consequences may be.” In staring into the abyss of an election loss, Lieberman may be on to something.

The following day on the other side of the country, I took my kids to the Shamu Show at SeaWorld San Diego, first stop on the 2006 Cox Family West Coast Summer Vacation Tour. Before the show began, August A. Busch IV, president of Anheuser-Busch, the company that owns SeaWorld, offered a video-taped salute to America’s heroes — a thanks to the men and women of the U.S. military and those of U.S. allies for defending freedom around the world.

This story continues below
Advertisement

I must have been refilling my bowl of chips during the most recent Super Bowl because I missed the ad where Anheuser-Busch announced that throughout 2006, members of the military and their families would be granted free entry at any one of Anheuser-Busch’s SeaWorld, Busch Gardens or Sesame Place parks.

As a New Yorker, where overt displays of patriotism are generally frowned upon, I was both a little uncomfortable with the video and curious as to the crowd’s reaction. I half expected to hear boos.

The show announcer then asked all those currently serving in the military to stand up. Hundreds of military families were in SeaWorld that day and during the 2 p.m. show, roughly 100 men and women, out of a crowd of more than 3,000, rose to their feet. The announcer then asked the crowd to show their appreciation and a long, loud and heartfelt applause followed.

Earlier that day, authorities in Britain announced they had broken up a planned terror attack aimed at blowing nine commercial aircraft out of the sky in a plot designed to kill thousands of people flying from England to the United States.

It was the whispered topic of discussion in the long lines queued up for SeaWorld’s most popular attractions. Looking out across Shamu Stadium at the families watching whales and their trainers do amazing tricks, it occurred to me that by planning an attack in August, the terrorists were clearly hoping to kill as many children as possible.

A few days later, as the Cox Family Tour moved north, we found ourselves at the Santa Monica Pier. As we looked north along the coast, we could see below us row upon row of white wooden crosses planted in the beach. Beside them was a row of a dozen coffin-sized boxes wrapped in American flags.

We watched from the pier above as the anti-war protestors, armed with clipboards approached beachgoers requesting their signature for what purpose I can only guess. Time and again, couples walking arm and arm, parents with families in tow and individuals strolling toward the surf, ignored them or waved them away. In the time we watched, we did not see a single person sign on to their cause.

This morning, at our not-so-swank hotel in the always-swanky Beverly Hills, a copy of the USA Today landed outside my room. I came across a letter to the editor from a man in British Columbia calling on Sen. Lieberman to withdraw from his Senate race so as not to divide the Democratic party and leave Ned Lamont a clear shot at his Senate seat. “Let’s hope Lieberman will see the error of running as an independent and allow a candidate who is against President Bush’s war to win,” he wrote.

I am not sure what it means when the largest daily newspaper in the United States, with “USA” in its name no less, needs to publish a letter from a Canadian calling on a sitting U.S. senator to deny Connecticut voters a say in who represents them in Congress.

But like I said, Lieberman may be on to something.

Robert Cox is a member of The Examiner’s Blog Board of Contributors, is president of the Media Bloggers Association and blogs at wordinedgewise.tv.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:41 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 10, 2008 re: "Mark Newgent: Stupid environmentalist tricks in College Park"

 Birdzilla said:
This whole global warming is a big fat lie antrctica is getting colder and despite all those stupid stunts pulled off by the greens they only prove their idiots or fools doing anything for the publicity

 Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:55 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 7, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

 Jane said:
Pretty soon Obama will propose we contribute 100% of our hard earned salaries to the government via taxes for his programs so he "The Chosen One" who has such a fine education and is so much better than the rest of us can decide who gets what. He is trying to make mules out of hard working Americans. Wake up people!

 4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:15 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 30, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Steve said:
And how much power does the wind farm supply when the air is still? I'm more a proponent of geothermal power, Tidal power, Nuclear power or Satellite based solar reflection. For the time being it won't matter the upcoming depression will kill consumption for the next 10 years anyway.

 5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:49 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 27, 2008 re: "Terrence Scanlon: Is ACORN disenfranchising the process itself?"

 Examiner Reader said:
was obahama associated with this group?

 6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 25, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Examiner Reader said:
If you are born american your for father fought for your rights. No one shold be able to take your rights away because you made a mistake in the past. You do the time for your crime then when it is paid you still are american and you should have the rights of one. Yes I'M an exoffender I got a sentence of six years not a sentence to take my rights away and sure did not here the judge say you can not get a good job no more.Why can an employer deny me a job becouse of the past that is like not hiring becouse I'm black or white that is breaking the law right. I did they take my right to carry a handgun when my crome did no invole a handgun. I think my for fourfathers fought fo that right for me. Why does a illegal mexican have more rights than an american born felon.We are people that pay taxs like everyone else. We put are shoes on one at a time like you. We have familys we need to support just like you. ONly god can judge>>>>>> Lance Dishman

 12 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:00 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 25, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Powerful Wife said:
Yes felons should be able to vote just for the simple fact that they are people. That whats wrong with this world right now people no matter what they do still should have rigths. I think that the child molester should have all his rights taken away. People want to put people with felons down but need to look at what kind of person they are because GOD RULES THE WORLD NOT PEOPLE AND THE PEOPLE OF THIS WORLD THAT GOD GAVE THEM SOME LITTLE POWER ARE JACKING IT ALL UP.

 13 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:00 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 flmom said:
I registered to vote today. I hope my vote makes a differance. Not every convicted felon is the same. Should we all be punished the same?

 13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 flmom said:
I was used as an example at a time when many women were being sentenced for being involved and supporting men who sold drugs. I myself had a very small child with this person and was in love, so I thought. I was charged and sentenced to 2 years in prison due the fact that I knew this person was doing what he was doing and I did nothing to stop this person. This was the roughest time in my life. I had never sold drugs myself and had no previous record. I was just that, guilty by association. I have alway been a productive member of society. I have served my time but this will follow me for life. I acept this and go on from day to day. This is very embarrassing for me. I cannot volunteer at my childrens schools or for their sports teams. I know most will say you get what you deserve for being involved with this person. I say to that...I have not seen or spoken to this person in 12 years. Should I pay for the rest of my life for a mistake I made when I was 18 years old? I registered to v

 13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:49 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 flmom said:
As of 2007, the law changed to make it much easier for Florida residents to vote after having been convicted of many felonies. According to the new law, if you have been convicted of a nonviolent felony, have fully completed your sentence and have paid all restitution, if ordered, your right to vote has been restored automatically. You do not have to do anything to restore your right to vote. I am very grateful that this has taken place. I have had this right taken away from me due to the fact that I have not always made responsible decisions in life. During my young adult life (12) years ago, I involved myself with a person who introduced me to a not so responsible way of life. I was used as an example at a time when many women were being sentenced for being involved and supporting men who sold drugs. I myself had a very small child with this person and was in love, so I thought. I was charged and sentenced to 2 years in prison due the fact that I knew this person was doing what he

12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:00 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 20, 2008 re: "Thomas Schaller: Imagining a post-Sept. 11 world with Gore as president"

 Examiner Reader said:
Emily wrote that that there have been no attacks since 9-11-01 "attack" (really and Inside Job, by the Rumsfeld/Cheney/BushCo Gangster Administration to Benifit Halliburton and other War Corporations) . . . WHAT ABOUT THE ANTHAX ATTACKS>>>?

 11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 16, 2008 re: "Paul Armentano: A billion dollars a year for pot?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Arresting people for pot possession takes hippies off the street - what can be wrong with that?

15 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:28 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 15, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I really wish you would list the exact sources for those studies.

 15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:12 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 12, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

 firstchoicepharmacy.co.uk said:
Hi Guys, Just though i would say Hi!, sorry if this is the wrong section mods! cheers

 16 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:35 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Tax bandits will have plenty to celebrate this April 15"

 Norah Schaefer said:
I would like you to include in the tax bandits the county of Dade in Florida that has tripled and quadrupled the property taxes in the past four years, forcing people who own rental property into foreclosure because they are unable to pay taxes like $14,000 on a small 2 bedroom 2 bath home. People are so quick to blame banks, but the reality is that many of my rental properties have old loans with mortgage payments of around $1,200 monthly and an additional escrow for taxes and three insurance policies around $ 1,800. (Just about the amount I get in rent). This is criminal and leaves the property owner unable to keep good rental property with good long term tenants. The only alternative is foreclosure. It makes me sick.

 15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:05 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

 Emily said:
Obamas tactics are very concerning considering the unstable world we live in today. After Bush (with congress support)announced war against Iraq. Did we have any more terrorist attacks on our soil? Nope. Not a single one. Obama isn't taking this seriously enough. "Obama will secure all loose nuclear materials in the world within four years. … "--- Four years. Need I say more? What will happen between then and now?

18 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Examiner Reader said:
To say that felons should not be able to make or vote laws in becuase they dont follow them is not always the truth. I was conviced of a felony at the age of 20,(Im 36 now) and I served 3 1/2 years in prison for it. On my release I decided to change my life and becuase a LAW ABIDING citizen. In the 16 years since my trouble I have not been in trouble at all minus a few traffic tickets. While it was a very difficult climb out of being a felon to being a productive member of society, to this day I still seem to pay the price for my mistakes even though I am no longer considered a criminal ill always be a felon and always judged for it. I say ive been a productive member of society and I beleive my work ethic shows that. I have worked and thrived for companies like MS, HP, Apple, LSI Logic, and AOL. I make a decnt amount of money and pay my share of taxes... when do I get to start being a normal citizen? Dont I deserve it now? yet I still have issues renting apartments.

 16 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:20 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Rep. Howard McKeon: Why I will vote to keep secret ballots for union elections"

 Rick Veck said:
Republican spin, since when have they started looking after worker's best interest?

 15 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:38 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 9, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Free speech for me, not for thee"

 Jay Ambrose said:
I'm a racist.

 18 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:49 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 7, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

 hythiptughFah said:
?????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ???? ????????? ?????????????? ????

 17 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:58 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 5, 2008 re: "Paul Chesser: Beware of climate control"

 Maddie said:
Im in First Lego leage and the research is on climate control! Thanks Paul Chesser

 21 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:13 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 5, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Examiner Reader said:
YES:they should have an opinion also.

24 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:03 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 2, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Examiner Reader said:
If you agree to 'filter' who can vote and who can't, I say filter better: dont let felons vote, but also any other unqualified citizen due to theire incompetency in making a clear voting decision: any moron with an IQ lower than 120; the undeducated (higer degree or more required) ; the unemployed (you're not contributing to the economical advancement of this contry, you shoudn't have a say), any smoker, drinker or obese to fat (hey, you cant make healthy decisions for yourself, don't bother trying to decide this contries futur)...this list is endless, and in the end, any criteria can be 'logically justified' and I bet a lot of you dont mind until you're the one deemed as incompetent to vote. if basic human rights like the one to vote are not guaranteed for all, we fall back on totalitarism: sacrifice the small for the greater good. Not only was that the communist motto but Hitler was a strong believer too, well most dictators.

 25 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:11 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2008 re: "Logan Gage: What does being president have to do with evolution?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The Question should read; "What does being President have to do with belief in common ancestry". The term evolution is ambiguous. (not certain of any specific interpretation.)

21 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:51 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2008 re: "Logan Gage: What does being president have to do with evolution?"

 StewDaPew said:
Allowing ideology and/or theology to dictate what is scientifically accurate or correct is fascism. Please stop demanding that others must share in your faith. One man's faith is anothers fiction. If you want to teach your children mythical yet comforting stories please do so in a private setting.

 21 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:51 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2008 re: "Logan Gage: What does being president have to do with evolution?"

 StewDaPew said:
Allowing ideology and/or theology to dictate what is scientifically accurate or correct is fascism. Please stop demanding that others must share in your faith. One man's faith is anothers fiction. If you want to teach your children mythical yet comforting stories please do so in a private setting.

 18 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:40 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 29, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: Uncommon death in the suburbs"

 Islam = Fascism said:
This kind of garbage flourishes in a culturer where our own Federal Government, despite being involved in the Global War on (dont say Islamic) Terror, goes out of their way to court the worst leaders aad countries in the Muslim world, like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Pakistan, and mouths lying platitudes about Islam being a religion of peace.

 23 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:53 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 28, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

 bxtf opdiwrke said:
vxwre qcmswo xzts yfvcd iwjzdtbpf qziraosy tgmbhu

 25 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:01 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 27, 2008 re: "La Shawn Barber: Local liberals learning new lessons on ‘diversity’"

 no no los illegals said:
You should see Huntington Ave. in Alexandria (Fairfax Co.) - it's like a landfill was spread down the length of the street... What, they don't have trash cans in El Salvador (they certainly don't have recycling bins.. heh)?

26 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:38 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 25, 2008 re: "Sen. Bill Frist: Free trade pact will benefit U.S., India and strengthen democracy"

 Examiner Reader said:
i always hang up on calls made by indi people, cant understand a word they say.

 27 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:25 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 22, 2008 re: "Mary Katharine Ham: Just go to Don’t Go!"

 Lifeofthemind said:
Mary Katherine, Please comment on the current conditions at TownHall. Since you departed have been reading a string of reports of anti-Semitic activty. This is most distressing. Perhaps you could help encourage them to clean their house. If quiet diplomacy does not work then you may feel a public statement is in order.

 30 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:51 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 20, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
Folks I am going to ask a big favor of you..a friend of mine who has moved to the island of kythera,Greece is in the throes of will they or wont they get wind power on the island,,problems aplenty..could you send this article to him to help him in his quest. Here is e-mail address;james@kythera-family.net Thank you if you can...Geocoroneos@netzero.net

 31 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:55 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
I've watched Picken's closely, he seems legitimate. As people have already mentioned he stands to profit from this venture. He requires our government to build and infrastructure that would allow for the energy produced by his wind farms to be sent to areas outside the heartland. The natural gas based cars are for fleets of cars not for the average citizen (I'm waiting for the volt). Most of you find yourselves in a bit of a pickle, you want cleaner renewable energies but you don't like big business. I loathe big government, as should any one who loves freedom and knows history. Big business needs to be regulated, we should see to that. We should not stifle new green energies because we don't trust big business; we should regulate big business because we don't trust them, let their greed power our homes and chevy volts, and let them compete with other greedy American business. I'd rather pay greedy Americans than transport 700 billion of our dollars to other countries.

 31 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
If he didn't own them you would be calling him a hypocrite.

30 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:45 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

 Examiner Reader said:
This article is flawed on so many levels, but I'll just touch on one here. People who have committed felonies and served their time deserve, on release, all of their rights back. The entire point of our prison system is to rehabilitate, yet when someone gets released we disenfranchise them and the system by saying that we don't trust them with a basic responsibility, like voting. It's hypocritical to say that a man being released from his debt to society is "free" when he can't do simple things like find a good job or live in "this" neighborhood or talk to "that" person. And it's made ten times worse when we deny them the most important right we have as Americans, and that's the right to better our situation and government by VOTING. You're effectively saying that an ex-con doesn't deserve any more rights than those he had while in prison except for a better view.

 33 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:26 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: A glorious spectacle built on government repression"

 TurkeyRidge said:
Chicoms probably got idea from AmLibs who did the same to our American cities in the 1960's. It was called Urban Renewal. Only difference is speed.

28 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:22 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
When you all make billions are start handing out hundreds of millions of dollars at a time to push what you think is a good agenda and get mocked -- then you can start all this hullabaloo nonsense spouting off about corporate and political conspiracy to take everything you have. Since when have you green promoting, hippie land, liberal socialists promoted such green ideas as wind and solar, and then immediately criticize people for directly spending billions to follow your goals. Of course he wants the venture to not be in the red but to be an evergrowing business venture. That's what people with minds and degrees do. Stop sitting in your hippie coffee shop drinking a Chai Tea Latte out of styrofoam and petroleum-made plastic criticizing people at least making a real dent in the carbon footprint when you can't even stop using $.03 worth of stuff out of selfish and lazy reasons. I really will never check this post ever again but wanted to take this chance to let you all have it.

 37 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:46 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
Communicating visually via print excludes the sound of the Greek chorus quietly humming in the background, "Drilldrilldrilldrill....."

 31 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:45 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Phil said:
Pickens is a very devious & cunning scam artist. He has a long history of corporate raiding of Oil companies. He uses stealthy dealing and unethical business practice to acquire wealth. He destroyed Phillips Oil company, Gulf Oil... etc. He has caused a lot of unemployment. Pickens donated 165 million to golf program at Oklahoma State, got the Katrina deduction , paid no tax, then had the 165 mil invested in his own hedge fund. The California Proposition 10 is another scam venture that benefits his Natural Gas company in with taxpayer subsidies. His son was given probation for a stock fraud scheme in Dec. of 2007. Pickens paid $300000 to the victims of his son's fraud. How that for Family values? It is really difficult to tally all the ruin this guy has done... Is this guy to be trusted with any plan? His

38 agree | 40 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:04 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Frank said:
Google "Pickens & water & eminent domain" and you'll get the actual story. Pickens is betting that water will soon be the new oil. He wants to sell the water to big cities in Texas. He's bought a bunch of land in the Texas panhandle. The land sits over the Oglallah reservoir, a reservoir relied upon by midwest farmers, a reservoir formed by ice-age melt so that it does not replenish quickly. He's formed a water district and is using eminent domain to take people's land to run his water. But so far he's still blocked. Pickens wants the wind farm and the power lines so he can run water alongside it. He's trying to use the warm fuzzies of being green to get his right of way so that he can suck the Oglalla dry, make billions of dollars, ruin the livliehood of many many farmers, and destroy much of America's agriculture. You'd think any journalist worth his salt would mention this, no?

 40 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:48 AM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader Winslow Boynton said:
For myself the article didn't have serious content. The technologies for the top power pods is not advanced enough. The ones I saw on TV used DC generators with conversion to AC. That requires brushes and commutators which were long ago removed from cars. More brainpower must be used to have AC generators and drive trains to accomodate the normal power grid. Also- the ones on TV required weekly maintenance, thats too expensive. winslowgb@verizon.net WINSLOW BOYNTON 134 Becker Ave Northampton Pa. 18067

34 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:18 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
I think Carney raises some good points. Part of his plan involves continued reliance on expensive natural gas for transportation, when we could be switching to electric cars instead. Why should I buy a natural gas powered car, if I can charge my electric car hooked up to a few solar panels on top of my garage? Why should the taxpayers finance a national wind energy grid, when local solar/wind hybrid systems could directly generate enough for power for most of our needs? Seems like a national energy grid serves to keep the control of the majority of power generation in the hands of the largest utilities, or investor groups, at the expense of locally generated power systems which could be municipally owned and focused on public service, good paying jobs and not primarily aimed at profits for stockholders. I'd prefer to see the two parties disengage from their Imperial ambitions, (i.e. stop their damned wars, and start investing in locally based decentralized public power generation. IMHO

 39 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:19 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
good article,but the real point is left out.its all about our carbon footprint.saving this planet if you will.giving a tax break to pickens is ok by me.he does mention saving the planet from time to time.i have never ever heard a texas oil millionaire say crap about the planet.aren't those southern christians supposed to be stewards of the planet according to thier book,which obviously they never read.

 37 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:33 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
This opinion piece illuminates nothing. Pickens has been open in discussing his financial interest in wind energy development and has invested heavily in it. Also, don't overlook the fact that he's 80 and doesn't need any more money. (I'm trying to get past the Swift Boat scum.) That said, T. Boone Pickens plan is spot on. It was surreal to see him on Larry King with Ed Begley, Jr. agreeing with each other. I hope there are government subsidies and tax incentives. I hope Wall Street begins to pay attention and that there will be a lot of job creation with the introduction of wind and solar power. If we don't get behind this technology now, we'll be buying it from the EU. Finally, this isn't a Pickens vs. Al Gore thing. Pickens is a business man and Al Gore is a public servant turned messenger. They're both visionary and they're both right. It's time this country stopped being scared of everything and grew a pair. Ask your grandparents how good it felt to be self sufficient

 37 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:01 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Wa Ho said:
It is not the "Wind Machines" that we should be worried about, they will at least provide a long-term clean energy benefit, whatever the intial cost. What is more horrifying is Pickens' plan to pump out the Ogallala Aquifer and pipe it to Dallas and others. The Ogallala Aquifer provides water for up to 60% of US produce and Pickens is planning to drain it for his own profit under the subtrefuge of public good. No water in the Aquifer means no water for food growth. You think $4.00 gas is bad, how about $15 bread...

 38 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
T. Boone Pickens is a traitor who paid millions to the Swift Boat Veterans for "Truth", then denied paying the reward to Kerry's swift boat mates (they designated the earnings to a charity group that serves injured vets) who answered his "$1 Million Challenge" and proved SBV"T"'s lies were wrong.

 36 agree | 39 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:05 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Examiner Reader said:
OK, then. Let us burn more coal. After all, birds thrive on coal burning power plants! And God forbid this rich man become richer. What I'm really trying to understand is if this means Carney hates solar energy, too. PV cells take lots of energy to manufacture, and -- gasp -- rich manufacturers and installers get richer because of -- gulp -- subsidies. Why doesn't Carney mention solar in his essay? California's solar power would be a minute fraction of what it is without subsidies paid, by taxpayers. Perhaps there's no target to aim at when ripping solar power. One thing I don't see in the essay is a solution. Carney tells us what's wrong with wind power, hydro power and hybrid cars, but he offers no solution(s).

 37 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:42 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Michael Warren: Congress not interested in probing lawyers scam"

 Ivan Fail said:
Unless and until majority electorate Consumers and the business community join hands ---, seize and impose majority electorate administration and full disclosure control over all phases of all 50 state attorney "discipline" bureaucracies --, we will continue to be ripped off, fleeced, bullied, exploited and enslaved by the lawyers. Currently the attorney "discipline" process is owned, administered, operated and controlled by the lawyers. That is a "fox guarding the chicken house" process. Continuing to try to use the lawyer owned, operated and controlled Congress and the lawyer owned, operated and controlled Courts to "shovel the rotten apples out of the legal profession" has to be one of the most stupid, impotent, tunnel visioned and "doomed to failure" missions in history. Effective clean up and accountability HAS to take place at the state attorney discipline level first! If we fail to do that the lawyers will write the "obituary" of our freedom in fine print legalese.

30 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:57 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 5th Estate said:
Gore was mocked and dismissed, but Pickens' newly-minted opinion is promoted by the business press because only businessmen can be respected (Riiight). The biz-press is functioning as a PR firm as it often does (e.g/ Enron, Health Savings Accounts, big companies deserve bailouts whilst individuals deserve debtors prison, and so on). Changing the energy infrastructure WILL require taxpayer contributions,the question is who gets the best return? As wind, sun and water are public resources it should be communities who benefit first and foremost--otherwise it will be business as usual where private corporations control and charge the public for public resources which the public has already subsidized whilst the majority of profits go to the largest shareholders who then avoid the income taxes that would otherwise constitute the re-payment of the tax-payer loan. The energy business may be new but the business model is old.

34 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:37 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Robin said:
Wind turbines don't displace any CO2, are extremely inefficient, are a developers dream come true as far as subsidies and double depreciation go and are taking money and time away from finding good solutions to clean up energy generation. Thank you for a thoughtful article.

 36 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:52 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

 Barry W said:
Whoever said the rich weren't going to make a profit? Nobody. The issue is about dependence on foreign oil...foreign intrigues...foreign anything. Why can't we be independent? Because you've been sold on the interdependence of the world markets. In other words we have to be a part of the global market. Crud on that. At least Pickens is doing something...risking something...taking a risk nobody else in the country seems to want to take....and with his own money. Sure, he'd like subsidies...they existed once before...but how in the heck are we going to build the hundreds of thousands of megawatts of wind energy capability without investment...without risk? They aren't going to magically appear. And do you really want nuclear? Really? The wind and sun can provide all we need today...with today's solar energy...not the energy from millions of years ago. Today's solar power today. Pickens is a hero...rich or poor...don't be jealous...applaud.

 31 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement
 
Site Map