California News

Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law

Jul 24, 2008 1:51 AM (28 days ago) By PAUL ELIAS, AP
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The scene repeats itself daily on city streets: a driver gets stuck bumper to bumper, blocking an intersection and preventing another car from turning left.

But authorities say that was enough to cause Edwin Ramos to unload an AK-47 assault weapon on a man and his two sons, killing them.

The deaths immediately drew public outrage, which intensified when authorities revealed that Ramos, 21, is an illegal immigrant who managed to avoid deportation despite previous brushes with the law.

The case has put San Francisco's liberal politics to the test, setting off a debate over its sanctuary law that shields undocumented immigrants from deportation.

This story continues below
Advertisement

On Wednesday, Ramos pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder in the deaths of Anthony Bologna, 49, and his sons, Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16. Bologna and his older son died in the intersection on June 22. His younger son succumbed to his injuries days later.

Shortly after that, police arrested Ramos, a native of El Salvador and reputed member of the Mara Salvatrucha gang, known as MS-13. Investigators believe he was the gunman, though two other men were seen in the car with him.

The heinousness of the deaths has put pressure on San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris to seek the death penalty against Ramos. Harris, who campaigned on an anti-death penalty platform and has never pursued capital punishment during her more than four years in office, has declined to say exactly how she intends to proceed.

"This case has been charged as a special circumstance case," making it eligible for the death penalty, spokeswoman Erica Derryck said. "No additional announcement has been made about this aspect of the charging."

Ramos' attorney, Robert Amparan, said his client was not the shooter. "They have the wrong person," he said.

Amparan declined to discuss details of the case, but he denied his client was involved in gang activity and said Ramos entered the country legally. Federal authorities contend Ramos is undocumented.

The victims' family learned that Ramos had been arrested at least three times before the shooting and evaded deportation, largely because of San Francisco's sanctuary status.

The policy, adopted in 1989 by the city's elected Board of Supervisors, bars local officials from cooperating with federal authorities in their efforts to deport illegal immigrants.

Officials in the juvenile offenders agency interpreted the law to also shield underage felons from deportation by refusing to report undocumented ones. Mayor Gavin Newsom said he rescinded the policy regarding juvenile offenders after learning about it in May.

The Bolognas' relatives say Ramos apparently benefited from the policy when he reportedly was convicted twice of felonies in 2003 and 2004 but never was turned over for deportation.

"All San Francisco's sanctuary ordinance has done is bring violence and death to this once-great city," said Frank Kennedy, who is married to Anthony Bologna's sister.

Kennedy called for an investigation of the sanctuary policy and demanded "prosecutions for violating the law."

Meanwhile, local and federal authorities are pointing fingers at each other over Ramos' most recent arrest before the shooting.

Ramos was arrested in late March with another man after police discovered a gun used in a double homicide in the car Ramos was driving.

The district attorney's office decided not to file charges against Ramos, and he was released April 2 even though he was in the process of being deported after his application for legal residence was denied, according to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

San Francisco Sheriff's Department spokesman Eileen Hirst said jail officials faxed ICE on March 30 asking if Ramos should remain jailed. Ramos was freed after Hirst said immigration officials didn't respond.

ICE spokesman Timothy Counts said his agency did not receive word of Ramos' arrest in March. He said the only communication received about Ramos was an "electronic message" from the sheriff's department three hours after his release.

The case has garnered national attention, leading U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., and an anti-immigration group called Californians for Population Stabilization to ask the U.S. Department of Justice to take over, alleging San Francisco authorities have mishandled it.

"Because San Francisco's political leaders have already demonstrated their willingness to act in flagrant violation of federal law, I do not believe that local judicial institutions can be trusted to fairly try the case or mete out an appropriate punishment," Tancredo said in a letter sent Tuesday to U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said he was unaware of the case and the congressman's request. Miller said the attorney general routinely responds privately to such requests.

Diana Hull, president of Californians for Population Stabilization, called on about a dozen cities nationwide with similar sanctuary policies to end those programs.

"We need to remember always that a death-dealing policy like `sanctuary' hides behind the false mantle of compassion," Hull said.

Nathan Ballard, a spokesman for San Francisco's mayor, said city officials were wrong to shield undocumented, juvenile felons from federal immigration authorities.

"The sanctuary program was never intended to shield felons," Ballard said. "The policy was inappropriate."

However, Newsom "still supports the worthwhile aims of denying the federal government" assistance in deporting otherwise law-abiding undocumented residents, he said.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:21 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 27, 2008 re: "Triple murder turns focus on S.F. sanctuary policy"

Examiner Reader said:
All who voted for these Democrats are accessories to the murders of the Bologna Family. I finally had enough and became independent. Illegal Alien trash are not going to murder my fellow citizens with my political support ever again.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:33 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law"

Stan De SD said:
Knowing how the political hacks work in SF, they will still find a way to blame Bush for all of this.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:02 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law"

Examiner Reader said:
Well if he was in the car he knows who pulled the trigger. Its called being an accessory and he can be charged like he pulled the trigger. So put up or shut up.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:03 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law"

sickofrisco said:
Noboy should be surprised by this turn of events. The (erroneous) assumption of moral and intellectual superiority by the hard-core left-wing mental cases that run San Francisco leads them to convince theirselves that symbolic acts of defiance to spite the Bush Adminstration and the Federal Government are more important than the safety and well being of its residents. These people are way too immature, narcissistic, and arrogant to be permitted to have any semblance of power over the lives of others...

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:50 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law"

Examiner Reader said:
Only in San Francisco are the "rights" of criminals more important than the safety of law-abiding people.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:49 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Triple murder turns focus on S.F. sanctuary policy"

Examiner Reader said:
The Federal government (ICE) needs to descend on Sanctuary cities across America and arrest the pathetic Mayors, and city prosecutors for aiding and abetting illegal immigrants in violation of Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A): I do hope that both victims begin a 'Class Action lawsuit, against the cities and all those elected official involved for billions of dollars. If you want to stop this travesty of our immigration laws, stop the next AMNESTY. Join NUMBERSUSA for free faxing.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Triple murder turns focus on S.F. sanctuary policy"

Examiner Reader said:
Whose the next innocent legal resident to die a the hands of an illegal alien gang member. Which 'Sanctuary city' in violation of Federal law, is going to be the scene of another cold-blooded murder of an innocent victims. First Jamiel Shaw in Los Angeles and now the Bologna Father and two sons slaughtered, in a growing car rage incident. Over the years since 'Sanctuary cities' became an abhorrent label, how many murders have been committed been hidden by the liberal court system and its timid thrall Hopefully Independents party members stop this travesty of our immigration laws Demanding pledges from both Obama and McCain, Reid, Pelosi and all the retinue, who are supposed to swear an oath of allegiance to all Americans, against enemies domestic and foreign. We must not let the biased liberal media slowly fade this heinous crime into the background. The Federal government (ICE) needs to descend on Sanctuary cities across America and arrest the pathetic Mayors, and ci

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:20 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Triple murder turns focus on S.F. sanctuary policy"

Mark Winshel said:
Actually, SF's Sanctuary Ordinance over the years has been repeatedly interpreted by both the Board of Supervisors and the DA's office to be used to protect - AND IN MOST CASES NOT PROSECUTE - undocumented aliens who commit felonies, and in fact Arlo Smith even forced one of the assistant DA's out of the DA's office when that assistant DA decided to prosecute an undocumented alien who had committed a felony. (In other words, Arlo Smith did not want that undocumented alien to have anything on his record that would have made the INS more likely to deport him.) Finally at some time in the 1990's (I don't remember the exact year) SF, and including its DA's office, decided to prosecute undocumented aliens who were major drug traffickers; however if they committed other felonies, the general policy was not to prosecute them so that their record would stay "clean" and so they would be less likely to be deported.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:50 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Man charged with murder in road rage death"

Examiner Reader said:
Cops my be doing a crappy job, just be glad you dont live in Baltimore.

13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:16 AM MST on Sat., May. 5, 2007 re: "Driver in road rage killing says it was self-defense"

Melonie said:
If it was self defense why did the other man leave the scene. And did Mr. Newberry have a weapon? I think it's ashame that a man was killed in front of his family and nothing is being done by the police. If he was'nt guilty why did'nt he call the police immediately, thats what I would have done. Seems to me he is hiding something. Makes him Look guilty to me. I also heard he was intoxicated. Also were there any cameras at this intersection? If he was drinking maybe thats why he left the scene. And how many times did he stab Mr. Newberry? And why did he follow them off the interstate if he was'nt looking for some type of trouble? Seems guilty guilty guilty to me and everyone that I've talked to. Maybe he needed time to think up something to tell the police. To me the Atlanta police are doing a crappy job these days. Way to much crime going on these days. Makes you scared to leave your home anymore.

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement