Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Long have I served as an unpaid and unsolicited advisor to MLB general managers, and when it comes to the possibility of offering employment to one Barry Lamar Bonds, loudly have I screamed, “Run like the wind!” if Barry or his agent so much as text messages a note of inquiry as to the potential availability of a roster spot this season. Yet here I sit in mid-July, befuddled by the realization that I’ve changed my mind.
When Bonds was run out of town by the Giants prior to the start of the season, even after posting solid numbers in 2007, I was relatively convinced he’d never pick up a bat again, unless it was in self-defense in a California prison yard. If his act had worn thin in his own clubhouse, and in the one American city where he was given a pass on just about everything that fans elsewhere in the country despised him for, then a change of address certainly wasn’t likely.
But then along came Hideki Matsui and his boo-boo knee ... followed closely by New York Yankees’ GM Brian Cashman. Maybe.
One of the hottest rumors in baseball as we inch closer to the July 31 trade deadline has Bonds donning Yankee pinstripes and fighting for at-bats with Richie Sexson, Jason Giambi and others in the Bronx.
The Yankees have done everything they can to quiet such talk, but virtually every report in which Cashman denies having dialogue with Bonds is countered by one that claims a deal is imminent. Ordinarily, I would be disgusted by the Yankees considering the signing of this man, who hasn’t played baseball in nearly a full calendar year, and who is under indictment on federal charges related to the steroid scandal.
But then I realized that I am already disgusted by the Yankees, for an assortment of reasons, and that the potential addition of an equally disgusting player could actually be quite fun.
Hating the Yankees is already the second favorite sport of my summertime anyway, and for them to add one of the most despicable figures in the game to their roster would only give me more ammunition.
Strangely, however, it isn’t the prospect of watching the New York clubhouse imploding all over itself that has me so excited about the possibilities ... although that is a major one. Rather, it’s the idea of seeing Bonds, the quintessential hard-case who’d just as soon spit on a reporter as talk to him, being forced to deal with the ravenous New York media that has brought many men to the brink of frustration-borne tears.
The San Francisco baseball media was not exactly known for harsh lines of questioning when dealing with Bonds, whether he was lurking ominously or lounging casually in the Giants’ clubhouse. Kid gloves came standard issue with every media credential granted reporters here in Bonds’ hometown.
He was the single most controversial player of baseball’s steroid era; the man who chased and finally surpassed Hank Aaron as the all-time home run king, yet he was able to dictate the terms of his own coverage in the local media through his ‘aggressive’ personality, and his influence over club officials who provided him with a protective perimeter whenever he wanted one. Well, they don’t wear kid gloves in New York. They prefer concrete boots.
Truth is, I couldn’t care less whether Barry gets to the Apple and hits .180 with three HRs and 50 strikeouts for the rest of the season, or if he blasts 20 second-half home runs and leads the Yanks to a come-from-behind pennant. The only thing I want to see is how the man who has intimidated writers and reporters for an entire career deals with veteran NYC scribes who actually bite back.
Let’s see Barry try to cordon off his own wing of the Yankee clubhouse like he did in SF. Not even “The Captain” Derek Jeter warrants that type of treatment.
Let’s see Barry force the NYC writers to genuflect and make the sign of the cross in flaxseed oil before speaking to him, the way he did in SF. The bully wouldn’t last two weeks.
I want to see Barry Bonds humbled before he finally goes away. And there is no more humbling place in the baseball universe than Yankee Stadium. Go ahead and sign, Barry. I’ll be watching.
Sports personality Bob Frantz is a regular contributor to The Examiner. E-mail him at bfrantz@sfexaminer.com.



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:48 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 13, 2008 re: "Dickey: Bonds towers above naysayers"
Report as inappropriate
5:40 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 12, 2008
re: "Dickey: Bonds towers above naysayers"
Report as inappropriate
4:53 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008
re: "Dickey: A meeting of bad baseball minds"
Report as inappropriate
9:37 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
5:31 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants waited too long to deal"
Report as inappropriate
5:26 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
5:24 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
5:21 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
4:44 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants waited too long to deal"
Report as inappropriate
12:21 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants waited too long to deal"
Report as inappropriate
10:42 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants waited too long to deal"
Report as inappropriate
10:07 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
2:11 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
9:22 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008
re: "Frantz: Bonds in New York would be morbid fun"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008
re: "Dickey: An All-Star makeover"
Report as inappropriate
1:34 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants are better off planning for future now"
Report as inappropriate
6:50 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants are better off planning for future now"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants are better off planning for future now"
Report as inappropriate
10:04 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants are better off planning for future now"
Report as inappropriate
9:48 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Giants are better off planning for future now"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
interesting and stimulating article... I am not sure about the idea Selig doen not want Bonds in baseball...
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
Bonds is as bogus as Ben Johnson, yet you rant on about him. Besides being pathetic in your unrequited admiration for him you have lost any and all objectivity about him. Barry Bonds, prior to the Mark Mcquire, Sammy Sosa era, was the ultimate five tool player. 6ft 1 inch tall 185 pounds he was without a doubt a first ballot Hall of Famer. Suddenly (in his early thirty's) he grows to 6-2 and 250 pounds. the fact is that you choose to ignore these facts by saying "he never failed a drug test" astounds me. We know that his trainer probably had a reason to stay in jail but i have absolutely no idea what yours is?
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's time to move on... bring back the Bulldog! Orel would be a great GM, his ties to LA and the Dodgers runs deep. He's played, coached, worked in the front office of the Texas Rangers... So what are they waiting for. Time to rid the Dodgers of all the people Ned brought to LA, Stan Conte, can pack his bags too! quick before he throws another GM and owner under the bus to save his own skin!!!
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Frantz = Jim Rome wannabe
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
what the giants need to do is to get her heads out there butt and get some solid bats.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hey Frantz: Barry Bonds isn't responsible for the hi price of gas or 4000+ soldiers killed in Iraq. In comparison, Barry's a saint.
3 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hmmm...the media. Gotta love these hypocrites. Love to judge other people but think the media are a godsent to the masses.BB was an all-star long before the Bash Brothers started using steroids. Don't believe what the media tells you.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What do you know about Barry Bonds? It was the media that killed the former Princess Diana. People like you.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
what a collection of mutts! the giants are the county pound of baseball!
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
giants are a complete mess.. they dont know how to bring up young tallent and foster it into confident everyday players.. the organization for years has been built on established players.. it is kind of like a person who switches professions and has no clue have to work in the new arena.. the giants. baring a small miricle are in for years of a tough learning curve in terms of bringing up tallent.. but it is sooner better than latter.. hopefully the area of overpriced soso free agents is coming to an end
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Sam in Reno said:
As you point out, the truth will be told if Bowker (who leads the team in HR's) sits against left handers. If he has to play Aurilia put him at third and sit down that slug Castillo. Castillo is a bad fielder and mediocre hitter. There is a reason he was cut by Florida and Pitsburgh.I have never seen so many errors and doubles hit past this guy at third.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You have no idea what this man has really accomplished until you pick up a bat and play at a level above little league...how about you just write about the game and leave the personal vendetta's out of it...
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
John P Slevin said:
Finally, a writer who admits that coverage of Bonds is based on personality disputes he's had with writers. Sports writers who assail Bonds are far from reaching the level of excellence in their profession that Bonds has reached in his profession. They are supposed to be writing about baseball...not settling scores.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Alameda said:
Jealous...I know your jealous...cause you have no skills...and Barry has set records...you WISH your little words could have the same power as a SPLAH HOMER...JealousI now your jealous
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Great observations and pretty basic. I think you'll find that most of us Fans agree with you.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This team is old as hell and Bochy and Sabean LOVE IT! Forget about evaluating the rookies, let go after thw NL West title while we're 12 games under .500. We're 7 games backs out of first but in reality we are 2 games out of being in LAST PLACE in the West. HELLO!!!! We're freaking closer to last place than we are to first.
8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
they play the old guys because the other guys suck and wont get any better
6 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Glenn, do you feel guilty about accepting a paycheck?
6 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Come back Barry! All is forgiven.
9 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Lloyd Christmas said:
Personally I think they gave vizquel and other veterans more playing time in order to try and get some value for them on the trade market. Vizquel is worth more with a swing than with out.
6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree