Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
New facilities are being built, gates and roads are being upgraded, and contractors are being sought for the next phase of building, regional BRAC manager Karen Holt told Harford officials at a quarterly meeting this week.
“Anyone who goes on post can see the dirt is moving, that old buildings are gone, and preparations are being made to put up the new buildings,” Holt said Tuesday.
But Fort Monmouth, N.J., which is slated to close and have about 8,000 of its jobs moved to Aberdeen, is still putting up a fight.
A lawsuit will be heard July 24 in U.S federal court seeking to stop the transfer.
The 2005 decision to close the New Jersey base was invalid because congressional testimony from an Army official on the high cost for closing and relocating the base was ignored or suppressed, said Eugene LaVergne, attorney for the American Federation of Local Government Employees Local 1904.
Maryland is preparing for the transfer, given that no BRAC decision has been overturned, Holt said.
“We’re at the halfway point now, and the clock is ticking,” she said.
“There’s about a billion dollars’ worth of construction going on at the Proving Ground at this point, so it seems pretty irreversible,” said County Councilman Richard Slutzky, of Aberdeen.
Opening in the fall is the first laboratory building at the “Gate” project, where Army land is being leased to private developers so defense contractors can have offices and facilities on base, Holt said.
While construction proceeds on the $477 million campus for the workers from Monmouth, the Army has set a July 30 deadline for contractors bidding to build the new Army Test and Evaluation Command headquarters, a proposed $25 million to $100 million facility at Aberdeen employing about 610 people.
To meet the increase in workers, several of the entrance gates are being moved and expanded, and local officials will conduct a feasibility study in mid-July for a “multimodal” transit center combining MARC train service, MTA buses and park-and-ride facilities, Holt said.
msantoni@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
5:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008 re: "Historians hopeful about preserving proving ground’s past"
Report as inappropriate
12:42 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 7, 2008
re: "Battle of Monmouth leaves jobs in limbo"
Report as inappropriate
9:17 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007
re: "Battle of Monmouth leaves jobs in limbo"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007
re: "Battle of Monmouth leaves jobs in limbo"
Report as inappropriate
10:29 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007
re: "Battle of Fort Monmouth leaves APG jobs in limbo"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I remember the old buildings that I used to live in and when they tore them down. Would it really benefit Aberdeen Proving Grounds if they redid the roads and tore down more building. I can still remember my old address on Agusta Street. When I visit there it just seems wierd that the buildings that I grew up in are gone.
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
OMG said:
Comment to 'City Gains': The city is being rehabilitated in some sense, and some people enjoy city living. Fortunately those coming from out of state don't necessarily know the crime and poverty that hurts the Baltimore population every day. That is, unless they watch the Wire. Then we're screwed.
73 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
O'Brown said:
O'Malley stays in trouble, Now he has company. The all-but-unknown Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown had one real task--chair Maryland’s subcabinet on BRAC preparations. And what happens? The move is now in doubt. Whoops.
153 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
man ill tell you that city gains person is right on if they cant keep cop's how are they goung to keep there residenits
143 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
City Gains? said:
Love the "new household" numbers. There aren't 2,548 people stupid enough to move into the city.
162 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree