California News

Multimedia News

The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...
Ironman World Championships
8 photos
Chrissie Wellington, of Great Britain, winner...
Women getting it done
20 photos
Anti-government protesters occupying the grou...
Female sluggers on the court and stump
20 photos
Russia's Vera Dushevina returns a shot to Ser...
LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...

Steinmetz: Baron made Warriors

Jul 1, 2008 10:38 PM (103 days ago) by Matt Steinmetz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Hard as it is to believe, point guard Baron Davis has played his last game for the Warriors.

Davis shocked his front office, his coach and his teammates Monday when he opted out of the final year of his contract worth $17.8 million to become an unrestricted free agent. He went one better Tuesday when ESPN.com reported that he agreed to a five-year, $65 million deal with the Los Angeles Clippers.

That the Warriors didn’t think he was going to do that would be an understatement. As recently as two or three days ago, the organization was preparing to move forward with Davis running the team.

Warriors coach Don Nelson said that Davis told him a few days ago he was coming back for 2008-09.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The problem with Davis walking isn’t just that the Warriors will lose their best player, their leader and the player that makes them go. What makes Davis leaving a bigger issue is that virtually ever player on the team’s roster is impacted — and not in a good way.

It might be a cliché, but Davis made his teammates better — particularly Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins, who are restricted free agents this offseason. As tough as it is to say, Ellis and Biedrins are far more ordinary players on a team without Davis.

How can either Ellis or Biedrins take the next step in their development without Davis? It doesn’t seem possible. Davis makes things so much easier for both of them.

Because Davis is a point guard with size, it allowed the wispy Ellis to defend opposing point guards rather than shooting guards. The fact of the matter is Ellis needs to play with a big point guard to be most effective and right now the Warriors don’t have one.

What about Biedrins? How much better did Davis make him? Again, a lot. You take away all Biedrins’ dunks that were spoon-fed to him off a Davis pick-and-roll and all of a sudden Biedrins is a 50 percent shooter from the field, not 63 percent.

Biedrins also goes from a center who might give you 12 points a game to one who’ll get you eight.

Don’t forget about Stephen Jackson. Davis was the one player on the Warriors capable of keeping Jackson in check a little bit.

Jackson had a propensity to try to do too much, even with Davis on the roster. Now imagine Jackson the leader of a Warriors team without Davis.

Davis leaving the Warriors will have a ripple effect that will impact just about everyone in the organization. There’s no way Nelson can coach the Warriors the same way with Davis not running the point.

Nelson intimated Monday that Ellis could play the point, but that’s not the best way to head into the season. Nelson tried to play Ellis some at point guard at the beginning of last season and it didn’t work well.

Don’t forget about Warriors president Robert Rowell and executive vice president of basketball operations Chris Mullin.

It appeared as though they were on the verge of officially bringing the Warriors’ franchise back after that dozen dark-year period. But that task will be significantly harder to accomplish without Davis.

Matt Steinmetz is the NBA insider for Warriors telecasts on Comcast SportsNet Bay Area.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:39 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008 re: "Liotta: Warriors took shot too early"

Examiner Reader said:
oh good thing there is so many Kevin Garnets to choose from.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:04 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 13, 2008 re: "Liotta: Warriors took shot too early"

Examiner Reader said:
How about we start telling you writers & sportscasters how to do your jobs. Just report about the team & its decisions not what you think is right. You guys seem to think you are more important than the game, which by the way sucks as much as you do.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:12 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 13, 2008 re: "Liotta: Warriors took shot too early"

Examiner Reader said:
Baron Davis was an above average point guard, but he was no hall-of-famer. I saw him play last season agaisnt Iverson and Iverson was so much better than BD it wasn't even funny. Same with Deron Williams, and Chris Paul. I think GS can get over the loss of BD. If they don't add another point guard they will have a drop-off at this position, but they have ungraded in other areas. Right now they three very potent offensive weapons is Magette, Ellis, and Jackson. The name of the game is puting the ball in the hoop. They also will be a better rebounding team, and they have some very good young players who are going to step it up. I can't wait for the season to start.

9 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:55 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
Matt-I thought that you were the one W announcer to come close to calling it as you see it. Apparently not. I can write for days on why I can't stand Nellie ... I don't have any problems with stating BW's limitations - he had many. He did bring athletism, rebnding, and a shot blocking threat when he was in there - something that most people value and W's lacked. My biggest problem with BW not playing was with who was playing instead. Matt Barnes is an absolutely horrible bb player who rightfully has no spot on an NBA team. The fact that he took away minutes from BW, Crosh,& Al is appalling ... yet no word from BA media. He's a horrible def player who is never in corrct position and is not physical ... only dirty. Let's remember T Hill. He was in Nellie's doghouse who couldn't get consistent minutes but later became an allstar. Who beat him out at PF?-V Askew. This guy always makes sure he first has an excuse of not winning ... can't handle high expectations.

4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
The reason Nelson didn't play Wright and Bellini is, I think, linked to his salary bonus. I'm guessing he would have got a fat bonus for geting the Warriors into the playoffs, and he didn't want to risk it. At this stage of his life Nelson is coaching for money, and I think this influenced his playing rotation last season. Nelson was fixated on geting into the playoffs, even though the Warrriors would have had trouble geting past the first round. Nelson is in the waning days of his career, so he's making short term decisions, he doesn't care about the future. That's why the Warriors would be better off without Nelson.

7 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:40 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

jason said:
um, it's obvious. think of which high school players made immediate impacts vs which took some time before becoming who they eventually became. yup, the loosely termed "NBA body". There probably are exceptions, but likely to be guards if anything. One look at the 1st Hawks game tells you all you need to know. As w/ nearly all young players (who need experience to make defensive reads & rotations second nature), Wright is not a good help defender yet, but he has plenty of flashes. And he's also decent when the offensive player faces him up. The problem is the low block. Once Josh Smith stopped trying to drive by him & posted up, he absolutely abused Wright. Also check out the 2nd Sixers game & you'll notice how easily Reggie Evans boxes out Wright. Wright started out at 200 lbs & could only bench 185 lbs twice. On your standard 45 lb bar, that's just one 45 lb weight & one 25 lb weight on each side. Hell, he needed 10 lbs & 10 more reps just to match Thad Young.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
if they let ellis get away i leave to. i will become a laker fan

6 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
For a guy that watches the Warriors close up, you're really bad at evaluating talent. Take a look at his highlight reel from last year. Are you in for every single thing Nellie has done? Did you even watch the Finals? Defense wins. Nellie doesnt care about defense. Other things Nellie has done: allow horrible shot selection, no defense, Pietrus can step out of bounds, Webber will provide us veteran leadership and not mess with AB, Mbenga will provide us interior presence, playing Pat Burke heavy minutes in Summer league will be good, POB sucks, Belli is going to start, bench baron the last game of the season when they been partying all year and playing lazy, lose every big game at the end of the year, not playing subs because playing them we would lose games but the opposite happenned; playin the starters too much caused us to lose games. now he's already said playin the young guys next year will lose his games. Looks like he covering himself from public criticism with that comment.

15 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
It seems no one is willing to criticize Nelson. He has an uncanny ability to select good players in the draft but he is horrid at developing young talent, and that is no exaggeration. No player seems to play at their best under him, not even Nowitzki or Nash. Neither became MVP under him. They both played better under other coaches. That is theonly reason he never won an NBA championship. he's had some very good teams with somevery good players, but his style of coaching is so depreciating to his players that none of them can play their best ball. He personally demeans them, and seldom gives positive reinforcement. Because of it he will never win an NBA championship which is tragic because he is a good coach, and especially good in the draft. But his negative style will never work for him or anyone else. I think it is too late for him. He is too old and stubborn to change.

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:18 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

WellInformed said:
Doesn't matter anyway, Ellis is an Early Bird Free Agent and can only be offered the average player salary (about $5.5 mil) in the first two years of an offer sheet. This is known as the Gilbert Arenas rule. How this writer who supposedly covers the NBA doesn't know this is beyond me. And again, you Grizzlies fans need to study up on cap holds. Your picks will make $3-$4 million.

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:05 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
Ummm... being a Grizzles fan living in Memphis, I've been hearing that it is very UNLIKELY that Juan Carlos is back with the team. Maybe they can do a sign and trade him. Therefore, it is very LIKELY that they will offer Mr Ellis a very FRONTLOADED lucrative contract. I like him a lot, but don't know exactly how much he's worth to the Grizz, but I guess we'll see.

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:58 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
the JR trade exception expires before free agency opens this season. Also, the Grizz do have more than $10M, it's actually more like $14M. They cap will be about $58 million. The Grizz have about $44M under contract. That's $14M left for free agents. Because there is a salary cap exception for re-signing your own players, they can wait to sign Navarro (and their draft picks) until after they have signed outside free agents because they can go over the cap to sign the in-house guys.

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:39 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
Warriors may have more cap space than the Grizzlies with the 10MM trade exception from the JRich trade.

9 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:24 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

WellInformed said:
Um, check your math. When you include the salary the Grizzlies are going to have to give the No. 5 pick plus the cap hold for Juan Carlos Navarro, I don't believe the Grizzlies will have anything close to $10 million to offer. Much closer to the $5.5 million everyone has with the mid-level exception.

10 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:31 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 19, 2008 re: "Walcoff: Don't cry if Nellie walks"

robd said:
this is an outstanding analysis. after watching Nelson's work over the last two years, good and bad, i completely understand why Cuban booted him out of Dallas. if the Warriors played with a shred of discipline they would have picked up the few games they needed to best the equally undisciplined Nuggets. and please don't say their success is predicated on the their unpredictability. you can play an aggressive, free flowing style and still take good shots in rhythm after moving the ball to the open man. baron has a dominant mid-range in to the rim game, who can step out and hit threes when he has it going, not the reverse. jackson cannot dribble and slows the flow too much, and harrington was jerked around so much i'm surprised his neck is not broken. and don't get me started on the young bigs and azuibuke...i am not delusional, the warriors underperformed because of their coach. nelson was a critical part of the turn-around, but he is well-beyond the point of diminishing returns...

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:42 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Official's call negates great games"

Examiner Reader said:
Matt, seems a point is being overlooked here. Not so long ago (last season) we had a ref that was busted for betting on games...seems to me the league should be doing everything it can to establish and maintain credibility of the ref's...from my admitadly slanted perspective the two games with LA were called overwhelmingly in favor of LA...this aside the blatant "blown" call at the end of game two could certainly be interpreted as a last push by the ref's to give the game to LA...sickening...we just turned the game off in disgust!

15 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:47 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Official's call negates great games"

Regulator of the truth said:
Dear Matt. You mentioned that people will focus on the last 3 second instead of the previous 95 minuts and 57 seconds. But the game went into overtime. I think you meant to say 100 minutes and 57 seconds. I left scratching my head in disbelief.

12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:29 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Dickey: NellieBall can't work in playoffs"

John, Lafayette said:
It must be that Nellie just doesn't know how to develop or recruit big men. By the way he treats the new guys, he doesn't even like to play them. There are players on the team who could be much more valuable, but Nellie doesn't allow them to develop. He just loves small ball.

10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:27 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 12, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Much was learned during trip"

Examiner Reader said:
Another idiotic article

12 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:30 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors are pure entertainment"

Matt (SF) said:
Steinmetz. Explain how Nellie is, "among the biggest pieces of work roaming the sideline for any team these days." I'm baffled.

41 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Sat., Feb. 2, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: C-Webb brings questions with him"

Bass said:
Besides some improper grammar, the idea that a broken down defensive liability is going to help the squad shows your inability to be objective. Go Diplomats!

47 agree | 49 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:05 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 30, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: C-Webb brings questions with him"

Dave Biagini said:
I just hope that Weber can make up for messing up this franchise for years by being a piece that will help the team. This move is one of the classiest moves I have ever seen in sports. Chris Mullin is really starting to building a legacy here. These moves by Mullin are unprecidented in sports. It would be akin to having say Bush and Bin Laden enjoying dinner and a cigar. Well, that might be going a little to far but you probably get my point Now, How about bringing back Spreewell. I think he can still play and probably wants to.

43 agree | 49 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:21 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors are pure entertainment"

slicksteven said:
great article man, spot on

74 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement