Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“It’s ridiculous. Utterly, utterly ridiculous,” said Rai Douglas, a local union president for parole and probation officers. “Everything we should be trying to do should be to make the public safe.”
The move comes after two parole agents were assaulted last Friday by a man who tried to escape the office while waiting for police to arrive and arrest him on an open warrant.
“As we are handling a very violent and dangerous population it is imperative that we do everything possible to ensure that we are as safe as possible,” supervisor Felicia Edmondson of the Violence Prevention Unit wrote in a Wednesday e-mail sent to staff.
The e-mail, obtained Thursday by The Examiner, instructs staff to house offenders waiting for police to arrest them on open warrants in an area from which they can more easily escape without assaulting staff.
“We did this so that in the event an offender chooses to run they can,” Edmondson wrote.
Edmondson also wrote that Parole and Probation agents have met with Baltimore police who have agreed to use two officers, instead of one, when making an arrest at the Preston Street office.
Such arrests are part of the state’s Violence Prevention Initiative, in which parole agents and police officers are supposed to work closely together to lock up violent offenders on technical parole violations, such as failing to report a new address or testing positive for drug use.
Rick Binetti, a spokesman for Maryland’s Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, which oversees Parole and Probation, called the directive a “change in logistics.”
“Our agents don’t have arrest powers,” he said. “If an offender is going to get violent, we’d err on the side of caution. If it came down to being injured by a violent offender or letting him run, we’d probably let him run.”
But Douglas said the directive serves only to show the lack of security at parole and probation offices.
“Our agency has never fully addressed security issues,” said Douglas, who suggested the department create a “lockdown room” to hold offenders while waiting for police to arrive to arrest them. “If I was an average citizen, I’d want to know what the hell is going on.”
lbroadwater@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:20 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Task force begins study aimed at curbing prison violence"
Report as inappropriate
12:13 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Task force begins study aimed at curbing prison violence"
Report as inappropriate
2:46 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
12:08 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
11:45 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
10:50 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
10:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
8:27 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
7:49 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
6:15 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
6:10 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
5:48 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
5:44 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
5:04 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "New policy allowing wanted offenders to flee called ‘ridiculous’ by officials"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Serious assaults on correctional officers dropped from five to two between August 2007 and May compared with the same period last year... sorta small no.s to on which to base lead. when they rise from two to five, will you say major incrase, and would that be a mirror on reality. or did you just mail it in to meet the quota?
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
group ... hopeS. we might expect this part, no? a trend one group of legislators, ex-inmates and correctional officers hope a six-month study that began Wednesday will continue. when they hope otherwise, maybe you should report *that*
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mr. Dick Sullivan said:
I am hearing the so called "leaders" of parole and probation never even visited the injured officers. I guess they are too busy trying to find out how the media blew the lid off of this scandal! When I police officer is injured on the job everyone from the Mayor, police chief and immediate supervisor are visiting. Thats because police support each other and probation supervisors never support their own agents. How pathetic! This once proud Division has been destroyed by childishness tantrums and incompetence. I don't agree with Judy when she said the managers at parole and probation would be suitable to be WalMart greeters. The WalMart greeters are a lot smarter! Judy you owe an apology to all WalMart greeters!!
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
F. Taxman said:
if you all would just please PCS them, and practice BTC you wouldn't be in this position. You get more with sugar than vinegar.
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Charlie, if we lock wanted criminals up, or make their escape from Parole & Probation a Felony, they can't vote for MOM and Sheila. Parole & Probation is in a real jam with this one. I'm sure you see the problem.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Charlie G. said:
This is what we call in the business, "ducks on the pond." Wanted criminals sitting in an office, waiting for a ride to Central Booking. Assaulting a probation agent or government employee in their office while attempting to escape apprehension, should be elevated to a felony with mandatory 10 years. Give them what they deserve. If I was in the Legislature, this would be a priority in the next session, not raising my taxes and giving it away to criminals. Let's get tough Baltimore.
6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Marty O. said:
Pat how could you allow this to happen! We should have a better handle on these violent offenders. We need to talk be in my office by COB!
5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
issue tazers to the agents and the offender can get a charge out of waiting if they turn violent.
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I guess the Corrections and Parole & Probation office is just another government jobs welfare program for functionally illerate Baltimore City High School "graduates." Another goverment employer of last resort. Sad and dangerous, but no surprise.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Judy S. said:
It seems that just when we thought things could not get any worse, they have gotten significantly worse since last October. Most of the people in management positions in the Division would barely be qualified to work as a Wal-Mart greeter let alone establish policy on safety or any other criminal justice policy. We are so concerned with "evidence based practice, managing for results aka MFR, the sytle and of email, creating case plans, and using the proper letterhead that the elephant in the room has been grossly overlooked. Putting Agents in charge of a unit of excessivley violent offenders but not making provisions for the absolute safety of those Agents is shall we say, assine. And that would be the State's case Your Honor...
14 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Corrections and Parole & Probation (P&P) is really a broken system there should be a move in the General Assembly that to grant P& P agents to the limited authority to arrest anyone within the (P&P) system on any open warrant or retake warrants, thus removing the need for the police.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Isn't that building run by the General Services Police? Why aren't they arresting the people?
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Supervisor Felicia Edmondson is a typical government employee. When faced with a problem, find an excuse to do less. She is just as bad as the criminals she fails to monitor, but typical in a State that is criminal friendly. Marylanders again get the goverment they voted for. Go figure.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Phil Cake' said:
I bet the people in charge of the Probation Division are more upset about the bad press than the wounded officers. I had no idea being a probation officer was so dangerous.
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jim Hotdog said:
Let me understand this. In order to prevent the criminals from hurting people it is better to let them run! This is an example of thinking outside the box. Very, very innovative, I like it!
6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree