Multimedia News

Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...

Manassas battlefield study aims at protecting views of the past

Jun 19, 2008 12:00 AM (203 days ago) by Dan Genz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
Preservationists are pushing not only for protection of Manassas National Battlefield Park’s grounds, but also its most pivotal views of the battlefield, which could be threatened by new developments. – Andrew Harnik/Examiner

Preservationists are pushing not only for protection of Manassas National Battlefield Park’s grounds, but also its most pivotal views of the battlefield, which could be threatened by new developments. – Andrew Harnik/Examiner
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Preservationists say it is not enough to protect the grounds at Manassas National Battlefield Park without protecting its views as new development spreads in fast-growing Prince William County.

Researchers extensively photographed and mapped the home of the first major land battle of the Civil War for months, selecting 25 lookouts, including the 10 most pivotal ones to visitors, that they will attempt to preserve from new construction of roads, office parks and apartment buildings.

“When you are trying to visualize the battles, you don’t want to have those distractions,” said Bill Olson, vice chairman of the Prince William Conservation Alliance. “You don’t want to look out on traffic jams or cell phone towers just beyond the fringe of the battlefield.”

Both the county and the National Park Service view the $60,000 study, set for completion at the end of the year, as a guide for future development that may limit the heights of buildings and mandate the planting of trees to block eyesores.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The researchers will release their study tonight at the battlefield, giving visitors and county officials their first peek at which views need protecting as the study proceeds toward setting development recommendations.

“Protecting those views will give visitors a greater experience and make the site more relatable,” said Ray Brown, the park’s cultural resource manager.

As the Washington region grows, it has made the land beyond the battlefield more valuable and attractive to developers and regional planners.

The Tri-County Connector, a major road set to link Prince William  businesses and residents with a faster link to Washington Dulles International Airport, is expected to be placed just outside the battlefield.

Henry Hill, home of the visitors’ center, is an example of what the study imagines preserving. Though there is extensive development to the south, the modern signs of commerce are screened by a thick layer of forest that protects what Brown called a “really iconic view.”

“On Henry Hill, you look out over the heaviest action during the first battle and the closing action of the second battle. It’s a site that has an impressive viewscape as you look out on the rolling countryside with Bull Run Mountain in the distance,” Brown said.

dgenz@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:54 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Manassas battlefield study aims at protecting views of the past"

Thom Ackerly thomas_C_ ackerly@uhc.com said:
Dan, Look forward to meeting you tonight at the meeting. If the NPS is so concerned about preserving the park view shed, then I'd like to know why they clear-cut 150 acres of park land last year and left all the stumps and branches on the land so it looks like a bomb was dropped on the site. There is no erosion control in place either. If a local developer or home owner had done this they would have been fined. I'd like to know why the PW Conservation Alliance is not up in arms about the rape of the land. The $60,000 for this study would have been better spent finishing the cleanup of the cleared land.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement