Multimedia News

Carrie Underwood at People's Choice
6 photos
Singer Carrie Underwood arrives at the 35th A...
Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...

Styrofoam ban makes impact

Jun 16, 2008 3:00 AM (206 days ago) by John Upton, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The amount of Styrofoam that litters San Francisco has fallen by one-third from last year, according to city officials who credit the decrease to a successful ban of the damaging plastic in take-out packaging.

In November 2006, The City barred restaurants from serving food or drinks out of the uncompostable and unrecyclable plastic. In audits of 2,200 of The City’s 4,500 restaurants since the ban began — with fast-food outlets among the first to be targeted — roughly 400 were caught using the contraband packaging.

But since then, more than 390 have mended their ways, according to figures provided by Department of the Environment spokesman Mark Westlund.

The City recently issued $100 fines to the eight eateries that continued to use polystyrene foam despite repeated warnings, according to Westlund. The fines do not need to be paid by restaurants if they switch to compostable or recyclable containers, he said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Most of the rule-breaking eateries stopped using the banned packaging following visits and letters from city staff, the Department of Environment Director Jared Blumenfeld said.

“Their customers quite frankly complain more than we do,” Blumenfeld said. “They’re like, ‘Why is there still Styrofoam here?’”

The ban appears to have had a significant impact: Researchers drafting an annual litter report have found the amount of polystyrene foam strewn across The City fell 36 percent in the last year, according to San Francisco commercial recycling coordinator Jack Macy.

Much of the remaining polystyrene foam that litters The City comes from packing material and from instant noodles and other products sold at grocery stores, according to Macy.

The lightweight foam can’t be recycled or composted and it creates litter problems and health dangers, according to Macy.

“People are getting poisoned by it,” Macy said. “Styrofoam has neurotoxic and carcinogenic styrene that’s used in its production and studies have found that it leaches out of the foam cup or container into hot food or drink.”

The Golden Gate Restaurant Association continues to support the ban, Executive Director Kevin Westlye said.

“The alternative products are affordable,” Westlye said. “Restaurants have adjusted and moved on.”

jupton@sfexaminer.com

By the numbers

4,500 Restaurants in The City

2,200 Restaurants audited after polystyrene foam ban

400 Restaurants caught violating the ban

8 Restaurants given $100 tickets after warnings ignored

36% One-year drop in polystyrene foam

Source: San Francisco Environment Department

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:06 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Styrofoam ban makes impact"

Examiner Reader in SF said:
Whether styrofoam is recyclable or not, it is one of the worst forms of plastic. It takes so loooong(thousands years!) to decompose them. It's just crazy! Of course, the material is basically from OIL. When temperature hot liquid or food are served on styrofoam or plastics, there is a risk of drinking/eating some chemicals/oil leaching from the containers. It is bad for human/animal/earth's health from the beginning of creating them to the end(trashing them). No good for us. Why do plastic things like, plastic bags and styrofoam are cheap when gas price is soaring? It doesn't make any sense. Plastic and styrofoam break into smaller pieces, which could be eaten by wild animals and it causes death of precious wild animals. So, not buying them and using them is the most effective way! Be smart and protect yourself, our next generations, and the earth. We also have to solve this problem in less-developed countries.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:58 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Styrofoam ban makes impact"

Examiner Reader said:
It's such a delight to hear how successful the styrofoam ban has been going. It's unusual to find out that something that was so common was unhealthy to the environment. I grew to know the truth. Luckily, we have seen less and less of these containers. Hopefully SFE can reach out to all food chains, restaurants, grocery stores, and even liquor stores to discontinue the sale of styrofoam products. It would be beneficial for us all.

7 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:22 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Styrofoam ban makes impact"

Examiner Reader said:
Um, Styrofoam is recyclable. It's normally just cheaper not to recycle it and use new materials instead.

7 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:21 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Styrofoam ban makes impact"

Examiner Reader said:
Nice job, now how about working with the fast food establishments, particularly those in Western SOMA since a survey of the trash that we pick up in our neighborhood , while not styrofoam, seems to be McDonald's paper cups, paper bags, plastic cup lids and straws. While at it, how about getting the daily free newspaperd (all of them including the SF Bay Guardian which seems to do "no wrong") and somehow figure out a solution to the discarded paper By the way, I think its a real waste to publish the city dailies since the paper is seldom recycled. Yes yes, freedom of the press is very important but once paper is "on the street" no one ever picks it up to recycle it.

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement