Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Bureaucratic snafus have cost the state $3 million slated for preliminary design of the proposed Red Line rapid transit, the Maryland Transit Administration acknowledged Tuesday.
And the MTA’s failure to meet the deadline to file a detailed progress report could jeopardize $1.2 billion in federal transportation funds for the Red Line, sources said.
State transit officials were alerted to the paperwork lapse last week in a phone call from the Federal Transit Administration, the sources said. The deadline passed Dec. 31, 2007, and the MTA has yet to file the report.
The report, to focus on alternatives to the Red Line route, is required as part of the request for federal funds for alternatives to the proposed line, which would run from Security Square Mall in Woodlawn to Johns Hopkins Bayview Campus. Transit advocates harshly criticized the MTA, arguing the failure to keep the project on track did not bode well for the future of the Red Line as it competes with dozens of projects across the country for increasingly scarce federal transit dollars.
“There was no explanation for why the MTA did not submit a resolution to start the process,” said Ed Cohen, president of the Transit Riders Action Council. “They just didn’t do it.
“This funding is important because it has to do with the planning process and money for the planning,” he said. “If they didn’t file on time, it could cause everything to be on hold.”
Henry Clay, an MTA spokesman, blamed delays in the Red Line design for the missed deadline.
“The project was not where the FTA said it should be to qualify for the funding,” Clay said. “We’re not far enough along the process, but we will be working to get the funds reauthorized.”
The $3 million earmark, approved in 2005 as part of a federal transportation measure, gave the MTA three years to comply with the paperwork requirements.
Final funding for the Red Line Project would come from a federal program called New Starts. The program, started by the Bush administration, has financed more than $9 billion worth of transit projects in 22 cities since 2001, the FTA says.
Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for Sen. Barbara Mikulski, said the senator, who helped get federal planning money for the Red Line, hoped to devise a strategy to have the $3 million restored.
“We are working with the Maryland Department of Transportation to resolve this issue,” Schwartz said.
But some MTA officials said privately that the FTA no longer considers costs associated with the preliminary design of mass transit systems as eligible for funding. That, sources said, could make it that much harder to restore the lost funding.
The Red Line has been a top priority for Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon, who in February appointed a former Federal Highway Administration planner, Danyell Diggs, as Red Line coordinator.
Diggs did not return a reporter’s phone calls.
Dixon recently attended a Red Line summit to hear concerns among residents of the more than 40 communities that would be affected by the proposed line.
Cohen, who has criticized the Red Line route, said the delay in funding may give more traction to an alternative he prefers: a line that would use some existing rail lines, right of ways and tunnels on a route from Security Square to the Johns Hopkins University Homewood Campus.
“In a way, this [missed deadline] creates an opportunity to step back,” he said. “We’ve been going forward with blinders on. This will provide that window of opportunity to straighten things out.”
sjanis@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:01 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008 re: "Senator seeks answers for lost Red Line funding"
Report as inappropriate
10:37 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "MTA’s missed deadline could derail Red Line"
Report as inappropriate
5:14 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "MTA’s missed deadline could derail Red Line"
Report as inappropriate
2:45 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "State officials deem Red Line alternative too costly"
Report as inappropriate
9:20 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "State officials deem Red Line alternative too costly"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "State officials deem Red Line alternative too costly"
Report as inappropriate
6:55 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "State officials deem Red Line too costly"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Mayor appoints Red Line coordinator"
Report as inappropriate
2:26 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008
re: "Mayor appoints Red Line coordinator"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Stephen Janis does it again. Be careful, ex, somebody might hire him away.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
mobtown desperately needs a real transit system -- all great cities of the world have them -- and this story perhaps illustrates part of the reason it probably won't get one anytime soon. step up, sheila.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
the #10 is a methadone clinic said:
on wheels, balt'moron.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Adam Meister said:
Ed and Nate are correct. Everyone should look up Baltimore TRAC and study their plan. We need heavy rail!
22 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
baltimoron said:
I use the number 10 bus, which is great, but a faster method for getting from Canton to downtown would be awesome! If you could add a park and ride at the East and West ends to clear up the East/West traffic on Boston, Aliceanna and Fleet streets, Baltimore might begin to look like a functional metropolitan area!
16 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Harry said:
I-70 was originally planned to go right down into the city - that's why the "highway to nowhere" in Baltimore, where HBO shoots a lot, was built. But politics got in the way of finishing it. I-70 should be finished, if for no other reason than to take pressure off the I-695 SW area. Baltimore has always been weak in east-west public transport. They need to do something.
17 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For the love of God, can they please build a heavy rail underground from east to west?
15 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Look the city is drug infested and has crime on almost every corner. Let her hire who ever she wants. If I were mayor i would burn that town to the ground
21 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
is it just me or am i right in thinking dixon dont like to hire whites if she can help it.
22 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree