Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
While the Police Department appeared to have survived a recent round of sweeping cuts to city services, local lawmakers this week approved rolling back the age police personnel can receive retirement benefits from 50 to 55 — a measure the city says will only apply to new hires and could save $500,000 annually on its ailing budget, said Brian Moura, assistant city manager.
“We have an extremely dire financial situation, and it’s only with that and a really heavy heart that I support this,” Mayor Brad Lewis said just before the City Council voted 4-1 Tuesday in favor of the measure.
But some of the city’s police officers say the new retirement terms — which would affect any police officer hired on or after July 23 — are another blow to an already whittled down police force and could impact public safety.
Gilbert Granado, president of the San Carlos Police Officer’s Association, said the Police Department will now have a hard time retaining and attracting quality officers. Granado said he doesn’t see how a skilled officer would accept a job in San Carlos when neighboring cities offer better benefits.
“We will see officers come here for training and then move on … or we will have to settle for [hiring] officers that couldn’t get hired elsewhere,” Granado said.
City officials say neighboring cities have implemented or at least considered reductions to retirement benefits. Brisbane, Millbrae and Daly City have implemented similar retirement amendments for their police and fire departments and in Hillsborough, Pacifica and Burlingame, to just the fire departments, Moura said.
In San Carlos, the Police, Fire and Parks and Recreation departments account for nearly 70 percent of the general fund, he said.
Last month, the City Council opted to spare five police positions worth more than $800,000 as it grapples with a $2.7 million shortfall and a downward economy. Positions for three police officers, a detective and commander faced the chopping block, city officials said.
“You get what you pay for,” one concerned San Carlos resident said. “Or, in this case, what you don’t pay for.”



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:18 AM MST on Sun., Jun. 1, 2008 re: "Prospective police: The choice is yours"
Report as inappropriate
10:11 AM MST on Sun., Jun. 1, 2008
re: "Prospective police: The choice is yours"
Report as inappropriate
9:14 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008
re: "Prospective police: The choice is yours"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
They have already busted san carlos mayor Mike King GOOD START! WHO IS NEXT?
688 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader Judge Judy said:
My choice would be to remove the criminal element from the city leadership as a start before anyone would notice a reduction in crime on the streets.
353 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader from san carlos said:
Greg ....Who did you hire to replace officers Armand Bonvicino and David Buelow ? They cost the city 8 million for the stunt they pulled on Bruce Hopkins.
2,053 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree