Multimedia News

Hollywood's hottest cougars
20 photos
Mariah Carey is 10 years older than her husba...
'Twilight' Mania
20 photos
In this image released by Summit Entertainmen...
Thanksgiving recipes
20 photos
Food & Drink Examiners are sharing a cornucop...
Hugh Jackman: Sexiest Man Alive (and a few close seconds)
20 photos
In this Nov. 10, 2008, file photo, actor Hugh...
Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...

Plan would smooth water for cruise terminal

May 27, 2008 3:00 AM (179 days ago) by John Upton, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Office buildings on San Francisco’s southeast waterfront could help bankroll a cruise terminal north of the Ferry Building under a new financing strategy due to be considered today by the Port Commission.

Elements of the project not involved with cruise ships would be shifted to a 13-acre site owned by the Port of San Francisco at Piers 30-32 at The Embarcadero and Bryant Street, currently used as a parking lot, under new plans scheduled to be discussed today.

State law mandates that development of publicly owned port land must be used for trust purposes of maritime-related “commerce, navigation and fisheries.” But legislation passed in 2001 to support a previous terminal project at Piers 30-32, which was eventually abandoned by the developer, gave some support to the concept of the non-trust office uses financing the trust use of the cruise-ship terminal, according to Port documents.

The legislation, which still mandated state and local approvals for the project, would likely have to be newly enacted or amended, according to the Port.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The Telegraph Hill Dwellers neighborhood group, which opposed a proposal to build the terminal along with a retail-office development at Piers 27-31, is likely to support the new proposal, because the non-cruise-ship elements are being moved to another location, according to spokeswoman Vedica Puri.

Port Executive Director Monique Moyer recently told reporters that the development of Piers 30-32 at South Beach could “solve an otherwise blight problem of the neighborhood” while generating an income stream for construction of the $100 million cruise-ship terminal. The Port struggles under a mandate that it be financially self-sufficient, because it has infrastructure and repair costs for its aging piers that total an estimated $1.9 billion.

San Francisco Convention and Visitors Bureau President Joe D’Alessandro said a new cruise terminal would float big-spending visitors to The City and create construction and hospitality jobs.

“Tourism is San Francisco’s No. 1 industry, and if we want to stay competitive we have to invest in the future,” D’Alessandro said Monday. “One area that’s really important to us is the positioning of San Francisco as a cruise destination.”

Cruise ships bring in $60 million of consumer spending annually, in addition to tax revenue and jobs, according to 2006 Port data.

Commissioners will be asked today to allow Shorenstein Properties and Farallon Capital Management to present draft plans for new offices and open space at the southern waterfront site and for a new cruise terminal at the northern site no later than September.

jupton@sfexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:19 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Plan would smooth water for cruise terminal"

Discount Cruise Cruise Plan said:
Plan would be great for the cruise travel and smothens the travel ship.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:35 AM MST on Wed., May. 28, 2008 re: "Plan would smooth water for cruise terminal"

Steven Berger said:
I would love to see some more articles about the cruise terminal that is supposed to be built/upgraded. It seems like everyone is talking (numerous articles about the new cruise terminal) yet no action is being taken. What is everyone afraid of? It sounds like they know what they want to do, yet they do nothing. Since your in the news business perhaps a little investigation is in order to find the truth about what their doing and when it will actually be built. Lot's of money down the drain by doing nothing. Look forward to reading about what the underlying issues are and who is stalling on this project, we need and desire a decent cruise terminal, is their any better location to cruise from, NOT!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement