Report foresees deteriorating commute in Montgomery
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The daily bumper-to-bumper slog of the Montgomery County commute is only going to get worse between now and 2012 as long-planned road improvements are overrun by traffic from the rapidly growing neighborhoods on the county’s north side, a county traffic report says.

County officials said that by 2012 they expect to have finished the Intercounty Connector between Georgia Avenue and U.S. Route 1, pulling some traffic off crowded city streets. And plans for expanding the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda as part of the Base Realignment and Closure process will include improvements to already-failing intersections where Jones Bridge Road and East West Highway meet Connecticut Avenue.

But Montgomery County motorists can expect to spend 16.1 percent more of their time, roughly 50 hours, stuck in traffic in 2012 than they did in 2005. That’s because at least 38,000 new homes and 127,000 new jobs are expected in the next four years. Two-thirds of the growth will be in the northern half of the Interstate 270 corridor, the report said.

And already residing in that area are some of the county’s worst intersections, which won’t likely improve as approved projects get under way, said Ronald Vaughn, a county transportation planner.

Developers who start planning projects after July 1, however, will have to meet new standards in Montgomery Village and North Potomac.

They will have to include in their projects plans for encouraging public transportation, widening roads and otherwise balancing the increased traffic.

But not everyone is convinced those requirements will improve the situation.

Terry O’Grady, a Montgomery Village resident and a founder of the Mid-County Citizens Alliance, said the county’s plans to build several thousand homes clustered around the Shady Grove Metro station and move county facilities from there to Middle Village and other areas in the northern portion of I-270, “will make traffic much worse throughout the area. Smart growth is one thing, but density of that type — whether near a Metro station or not — is problematic.”

fklopott@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:16 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess SF really doesn't want people to come to the City! What a load of crock. Nobody in the SF govt has any business sense. Great, kill the goose that lays the golden eggs (businesses and sales taxes).

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:59 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

just shoot me said:
sweet - another friggin toll. I already pay $1000/month in commute costs.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:41 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

Examiner Reader said:
If there were a viable, reliable CLEAN option then people would be able to not drive. Without that option people must drive. Clean up MUNI, make it dependable and regular and co- ordinate with other transit agencies and people will want to get out of their cars. As it is if you are in a hurry or out of communte hours MUNI is not an option. Also, I am unclear why people love BART!. Signage is pathetic and it is NOT co-ordinated with MUNI or Golden Gate transit, what's the point? Take a look at NYC, London or Paris to get a look at what good transit systems are. Funny, their workers show up and they keep to a timetable. Maybe we could try doing that?

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:43 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008 re: "A way around crash sites"

Bruce Simmons said:
for one, I don't understand how it cost $30 million to instigate the deployment of traffic control officers and traffic cones. Second, how would diverting a traffic jam to El Camino Real alleviate anything. El Camino Real is already questionably jammed up at traffic time and the ensuing flood of motor vehicles would only spill the excess onto the various side streets around that road. Spend the $30 million where it's needed, on the school systems or homeless shelters.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:21 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "Three die in crash-filled weekend"

Examiner Reader said:
R.I.P. DeKeisha Skaggs! We will all miss you! -Jessica G. P.

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"

Examiner Reader said:
600 Million dollars? Much too expensive and way too late to fix the problem. By the time the road is built, no one will care because the people will be gone.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:31 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"

Examiner Reader said:
These choke points have been around for over 30 years - and the drivers that dart into the lane and slam on their brakes that have not killed themselves are still endangering the rest of us! Leave the Baltimore area for good - I did 12 years ago and life is so much better since I don't have to deal with the crime or the local corporate societal ladder. I love to hear the companies complain about the lack of talent in the region. The problem is everybody in the Baltimore business district is trying to rape each other so what is left is table scraps for the locals - they don't have a problem hiring out of staters and paying them big bucks but if you are a local they hate the fact that they are reliant on you - especially if you are white and have a moral value system.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:49 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Crash won't accelerate bridge-median plan"

ms jackson said:
All this money spent on highway dividers, anti smoking campaigns, youth violence intiatives, dietary labeling, unwanted pregnancies, anti suicide barriers, etc. could be saved by introducing a microscopic brain implant that would cause extreme pain and forced change of action any time somebody begins to behave in a way that creates any sort of societal problems. Of course, this would mean about 95 percent of huimanity would be constantly groaning in pain and apparently changing their minds!

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:03 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Bad weather causes traffic delays around District"

Examiner Reader said:
oh my gosh that is bad people need to start being more careful

148 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:16 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"

Examiner Reader said:
When someone does something like this, it not only saves lives, it leaves the rest of us with the knowledge that one of us did a great good thing. I'm so grateful for that knowledge. John Beatty is a really good man.

198 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:44 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"

San Francisco Voter said:
Wow. I knew there were at least a few good people around here.

208 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:16 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 17, 2007 re: "Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually"

Mike Licht said:
>>Re: Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually<< Editorial decision to omit hyperlink to the actual study is a gross disservice to readers.

231 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:09 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "Triathlon will snarl Sunday traffic"

William Cooke said:
Great race. Thanks Annapolis, Annapolis Police, and AA County Police.

291 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.19 seconds)