Examiner.com // 24 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 33 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 38 mins ago
Examiner.com // 1 hr 32 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 49 mins ago
Quick Read | Daily News // 1 hr 52 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 24 mins ago
Quick Read | CBS2-KCAL // 2 hrs 27 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 31 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 38 mins ago
 
   
Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant
Anti-nuclear activists opposed to the construction of a third nuclear reactor at Calvert Cliffs protest Friday at Redwood and Paca streets in Baltimore City.
(Kristine Buls/Examiner)
Anti-nuclear activists opposed to the construction of a third nuclear reactor at Calvert Cliffs protest Friday at Redwood and Paca streets in Baltimore City.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - About a dozen anti-nuclear demonstrators Friday took to the streets of downtown Baltimore City to counteract Gov. Martin O’Malley’s endorsement of the construction of a third nuclear reactor at Calvert Cliffs in Maryland.

“There are cheaper, safer alternatives,” said Stephen Soifer, spokesman for the Chesapeake Safe Energy Coalition, which includes the Sierra Club and seven other environmental and anti-nuclear groups.

Soifer, an associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Social Work, said, “It’s not a moral imperative” as O’Malley said Thursday when he toured Constellation Energy’s Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant, a major source of Maryland’s electricity.

Radioactive waste from the spent nuclear pellets that fuel the Calvert County plant last 10,000 years, Soifer said.

“It the only power source” that leaves behind such a toxic residue, he said.

Soifer and other demonstrators scoffed at the supposed $4 billion price tag on the new plant that will take about seven years to build.

He and other demonstrators said it would be at least double that amount — if not three and four times that amount based on new plants being built in Europe.

That money could be better spent on wind, solar or ocean sources, Soifer said.

Constellation has not updated its 2005 estimate of $4 billion to $6 billion to build the new reactor because “it’s considered a sensitive number,” said Maureen Brown, company spokesman.

But the final number will be nowhere near as high as the activists project, she said.

Even if the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada is finally approved for nuclear waste disposal, “we need a second and possibly third site,” Soifer said because of the waste accumulated at nuclear plants during the past five decades.

“There isn’t a solution to the nuclear waste issue,” said Dr. Gwen Dubois, a demonstrator and physician at Sinai Hospital in Baltimore City.

In addition to the financial issues, “there’s a problem with safety at the plants,” she said.

The growing stockpile of nuclear waste is a potential source of material for nuclear bombs, Dubois said.

“It’s the same technology” used to enrich uranium, she said.

“We’re making nuclear material ubiquitous.”

TIMELINE

Source: Constellation Energy

llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

4:38 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

The Devil said:
You protesters might want to stay home for a few years.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:43 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

God said:
Some day in the future there will be small nuclear power plants fot the home. This will be a major advancement for us.Plenty energy for the home and at the same time sell some through the electrical grid so others can share .

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:44 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

A giraffe dies said:
Oh, and by the way, even the founder of Greenpeace finally woke up and is now calling for building more nuclear plants. I guess there's hope for you guys after all.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:42 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

A giraffe dies said:
10:00 Nuclear power is incredibly cheap on a per KW basis if there were not so many uninformed idiots like you trying to place as many barricades in its way. We have not started a new nuclear plant in this country in nearly 40 years although we have built many. Why, to get a nuke plant operational requires at least three votes to become operational - approval of a plant, plans for the site, building permits, fueling and going on-line. Most communities approve the plannig and building and then shoot the project down before it can become operational, just like Yucca Mtn. Why? Because they get the money from construction and then idiot environmentalists sway the uninformed. Get your head out of the sand and read some history, idiot.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:26 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

God said:
We have a much better chance of having a astroid destroy the earth than ever having such problems with man made power such as Nuclear Energy. Thumbs up on nuclear energy , thumbs down on burning wood and oil and gas for electricity.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

Examiner Reader said:
Nuclear power has never been cheap. It has needed 300 billion dollars in bailouts (of our taxpayer money) to keep it alive. Wallstreet does not like nuclear power. Capitalism is not compatible with nuclear power ( a heavily subsudized industry here in the US, France, Spain Germany everywhere. Why,? it's an economic failure. The waste bill alone will go on forever. The sun will engulf the earth before we have paid our last waste bill. Yucca mountain may never open. Even if it does, its out of space. Get you facts straight then run your mouth.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:07 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

A giraffe dies said:
If these idiots get their way, we would all be sitting at home, starving to death in the dark. Nuclear power is the safest, cleanest, most cost efficient source of energy man has ever devised. They emit no pollution, has the best safety record of any other viable energy production system and generates a large amount of energy for it's footprint. As for waste, new (1990's) advances in waste storage such a vitrification and the Yucca mountain facility has made waste storage and disposal so safe that it is realistically a non-issue. Vitrification (glassification) turns the waste into a big glass rod - therefore no leaks, ever. Then these rods are buried and sealed in a huge salt dome hundreds of feet underground in the middle of a desert - therefore no health or environmental impact. Notice that none of the protesters are engineering types?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:12 AM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

Examiner Reader said:
Nuclear and coal are not poison . Being out in sunlight has 100 times more radiation then sitting on top of a nuclear plant.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 AM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

Examiner Reader said:
Your going to have to buy that power from some nuclear plant some where. If not from Maryland then from some overprice plant in some other state. If not nuclear then a coal fired plant. Pick you poison....

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

Protesters Unite said:
Go home all of you go home. Go home and turn off all of your lights. Unplug the refrigerator, set aside the coffee maker, open all the circuit breakers in your electrical panel. Now get out and get a few hundred thousand of your friends to do the same and presto - Maryland will not need a new nuclear plant. As a matter of fact with you and a couple hundred thousand other people not buying electricity, the utilities will not have the money to build the additional capacity that will no longer be needed. Me, I am keeping my lights, computers, TV, COFFEE MAKER, and air conditioning as well as electric heat. I accept that nuclear power plants are the most cost effective generation units when looked at over the life of the plant. I have lived within 10 miles of nuclear plants my entire adult life and welcome additional plants to the neighborhood. The economic prosperity brought by these plants to a neighborhood is well understood and appreciated.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:01 AM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Demonstrators protest Maryland's new nuclear plant"

Examiner Reader said:
Lets give these people a cave to live in ,then ask them, where they are going to put thier waste!

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)