Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit
Pharmacies in The City are the target of a new proposal.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
Pharmacies in The City are the target of a new proposal.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - San Francisco would become the first city in the nation to ban the sale of tobacco in pharmacies if legislation that was quietly introduced by Mayor Gavin Newsom is approved.

If the Board of Supervisors adopts the legislation, hundreds of pharmacies in The City would have to stop selling tobacco products — including cigarettes, cigars, pipes and chewing tobacco — as soon as October.

“This is a sensible measure to deal with health problems before they start, and it’s consistent with our prevention-focused efforts such as Healthy San Francisco and Shape Up SF,” Newsom said.

A violation would carry steep fines, ranging from $100 to $1,000.

The legislation says that “through the sale of tobacco products, pharmacies convey tacit approval of the purchase and use of tobacco products.”

Public Health Department Director Mitch Katz, who would oversee the enforcement, said it is a “conflict of interest” for pharmacies to sell tobacco products. In some cases, he said, people go to the stores to buy medication to treat health complications brought on by smoking.

Katz said the ban could reduce smoking as it creates another restriction that sends the message “smoking is bad.”

In recent years, San Francisco has snuffed out smoking in restaurants, parks, transit stops and most bars.

Walgreens spokesman Michael Polzin said the “biggest concern” about the proposed ban is how it would impact the sales of other products.

The proposal is expected to pick up support from pharmacists.

Michael Negrete, CEO of the Pharmacy Foundation of California, said a business promoting health should not “sell things that are hazardous to health.”

Smokers seem to have a different outlook.

Shamilla Jensen, who had purchased a pack of cigarettes from a Walgreens on Market Street, called the proposed law “silly.”

“Isn’t this a country that touts our freedom?” she said. “Why can’t someone be free to go to Walgreens and buy a pack of cigarettes or not buy a pack of cigarettes?”

A pharmacy is considered a business that has a state-licensed pharmacist on site selling prescription pharmaceuticals, which includes businesses such as Walgreens and Rite-Aid. The prohibition does not apply to general grocery stores or big-box stores.

A Board of Supervisors committee could vote on the legislation in the coming weeks.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:15 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Brian said:
Walgreens and Rite Aid receive about half of their profits from the sale of prescription drugs (check their annual reports). NIH guidelines for the treatment of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, asthma, and other common problems call for a combination of prescription drugs and the avoidance of tobacco. A good part of the City's Health Department budget goes toward treating diseases that might be treated more effectively (and lessened in prevalence) if the connection between tobacco and the effective use of Rx drugs were more widely appreciated. Pharmacies should not sell tobacco. Isn't it a conflict of interest for these pharmacies to sell tobacco?

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:56 PM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
The US stands pretty much alone in the world in allowing pharmacy chains to sell cigarettes. To me, it's just another example of US tobacco interests in bed with the corporate chains: Rite Aid, Walgreens, Safeway and Costco. These chains laugh all the way to the bank while our families suffer and die. Who out there hasn't lost someone to tobacco-related heart disease, stroke, cancer or lung disease?

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
Walgreens isn't a pharmacy: it HAS a pharmacy. So does Safeway. Anyone who actually shops at Walgreens (or Rite-Aid) knows that the pharmacy is a small portion of a store selling a huge variety of other products, and that the pharmacy already doesn't sell cigarettes. So what does this legisation mean?

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:21 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
wheezy, Walgreens doesn't sell Alcohol. I used to work there and the only ones in the country that do are in Illinois. Well, rubbing alcohol and mouthwash. Are you saying that mouthwash encourages alcoholism? Oh and "Pot is illegal", Walgreens doesn't sell medical marijuana. I think this is great to get rid of cigarettes there, but really if they are legislating to make drugstores into healthy places, the biggest issue is the junkfood they sell. I would almost say that is worse for your health than the cigarettes. I guess it isn't as easy of a target.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:12 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
There are plenty of other places to buy cigarettes besides pharmacies. It does seem strange to me to be buying a product that caused illness and death at a store that is suppposed to be selling products that save lives.

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:30 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
My opinion of Newsom just dropped a whole lot. This legislation is not helpful: it's just arrogant interference. I am all for programs that discourage people from starting smoking and encourage people to quit; and yes, we should all be able to breathe air free from second-hand smoke; but when I hear about most anti-smoking legislation, I feel like I'm being kicked while I'm down, not to mention being treated like easy prey. And with this kind of legislation, it's impossible to pretend it's intended to do anything except exercise unwanted control over other people "for their own good." Is it necessary to explain how that that is just plain wrong?

0 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
Eliminating cigarettes sales at Walgreens is not likely to significantly impact the level of smoking in San Francisco or anywhere for that fact. This strikes me as an overly simplistic approach to the otherwise complex and complicate circumstances of compulsive/addictive behaviors.

0 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:14 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

pot is illegal said:
the irony..you can get "medical dope" and medical pot brownies but not legal cigs???? at a REAL pharamacy?? idiotic!

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:01 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
I've never seen a Walgreens in SF that carrys alcohol. I heard they used too, but don't think they do anymore.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:01 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
Do we really want to make pharmacies less profitable?

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:51 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't he have anything better to do with his time?

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:20 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
But what about all of that wonderful Tobacco tax money?

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:54 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Wheezy said:
WALGREEN'S sells cigarettes cheaper than any other place in San Francisco. Walgreens, by law, also sells needles for injecting illicit drugs like heroin and meth to anyone without a prescription. Walgreens also sells booze the number one abused drug in San Francisco that leads to more deaths in the short term than any other. San Francisco has a huge drug and alcohol problem and yet Mayor Newsom, who has admitted to having an alcohol problem, self rightously wants to deny tobacco consumers acess to their own legal drug of choice: nicotine, in a city where the pungent smell of skunk weed often time permeates the library and muni buses, drunks and crackeheads, and junkies lie in doorways and drug dealers ply their trade openly and without inteference all over the city. The problem with the proposal to prevent drugstores from selling tobacco is that smokers can easily, albeit more expensively, buy their smokes at lots of other places.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:24 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mayor aims to kick drug stores’ habit"

Examiner Reader said:
Cigarettes are often found behind the counter of pharmacies and require people to be of age to purchase. Customers who do not smoke will not have to wait as long to buy their purchases. And maybe we would not see Walgreen's employees smoking outside the store!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)