One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Deborah Jeane Palfrey seems to have followed one of her former employees to suicide — a fate she once prided herself on having avoided.

Brandy Britton, 43, died by suicide in January 2007, days before she was scheduled to stand trial on prostitution charges and be evicted from her $600,000 suburban Baltimore home. Before her death, Palfrey said Britton, a former University of Maryland Baltimore County professor, was one of her employees.

“She wasn’t making enough money, so she decided to do a little moonlighting,” Palfrey said during an interview with newsmagazine “20/20.”

“I guess I’m made of something that Brandy Britton wasn’t made of,” Palfrey said after she learned of Britton’s apparent suicide.

In her last interview before her death, Britton told The Examiner  she previously worked for an escort service called East Coast Elites, but she never mentioned Palfrey or her firm, Pamela Martin & Associates.

Britton’s Howard County police file made no mention of Palfrey or her escort service. Police said Britton was working alone when arrested in January 2006, and they have not connected her case to Palfrey.

After Britton’s death, Howard police turned over more than 186 pages of their investigative file into Britton’s alleged criminal activities to The Examiner, including client lists dating from Nov. 16, 2005, to Jan. 8, 2006.

Although Britton said her clients included “police, lawyers and judges,” her notes don’t appear to include the names of prominent people.

They do contain many partial names and code names, including notes for appointments with men identified only as “Robert,” “Bernard” and “David.” Next to their names, she sometimes wrote the callers’ purported occupations, such as “Dr.” or “Accountant.”


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:54 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "‘D.C. Madam’ notes say suicide was only way out"

Brenda from England said:
The US Government psychologically tortured Deborah Jeane Palfrey to the point of suicide, (in other words to the point of murder). From an international human rights point of view she was totally innocent. Why did the US Government do such a thing to her? So they could steal her assets and life savings and claim everything was done legally. Deborah worked hard for her money, she was an intelligent, successful and hard working business woman. In her 52 years of existence she never hurt one soul, she was a sweet and beautiful person. Every single government official involved with her case (or torture) have her blood on their hands. The US government basically murdered her just so they could steal her money. Only a very cruel government could do such a thing. (Deborah - I as a fellow human being love and respect you with all my heart, I know you were innocent just like Jesus was innocent of all charges brought upon him before he was crucified - God bless your soul).

0 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:41 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"

Examiner Reader said:
Palfrey was a woman who made selfish choices til the end.She profited from a business which hurt innocent women(wives)and children via their louse husbands/fathers.How many wives have been devastated... caught STDs? How many children have been scared and confused by marital discord/divorce? Her note was remorseless and all about her..."I can't be incarcerated...I'll be in my late 50's...penniless...I was the victim of a public lynching..."I,I,I".She even hung herself on her mother's property:SELFISH! She chose illegal activity and devalued marriage that is why she was enroute to prison and "alone". The former escort who commented contradicts herself by stating that she hadn't been proud of that time in her life,but goes on to justify it because it is between consenting adults,she needed money etc.Some serious soul searching may be beneficial.She would probably never assault an unsuspecting mother and child.But in a sense,she has done just that.

0 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:02 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"

Examiner Reader said:
It's sad for anyone to end their life in such a manner. As for the so called western culture, sex outside of marriage is an abonination to God. Have you not heard that the wages of sin is death!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:00 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"

Examiner Reader said:
She did what she thought was best at the day and time.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:01 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "‘D.C. Madam’ allegedly dies by suicide in Fla."

reader said:
She didn't have a choice .

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:47 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"

Examiner Reader said:
I am one of Palfrey's former escorts. I did not testify in the hearings though. That period of my life is one I'm not proud of, but it got me through some pretty rough financial times. Personally I don't get why it's illegal. It was concentual and safe, and "Julia" (aka Deborah) took good care of us. I worked there 6 weeks and made well over $10,000. Paul Huang, mentioned in this article, was one of my most frequent clients. In fact he was one of two who knew my real name.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:41 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008 re: "Naval officer faces dismissal after testifying in madam trial"

Examiner Reader said:
She made a choice. Now she has defined herself.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:16 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"

Examiner Reader said:
Sorry icant understand this western hypocrisy!If having sex is not outlawed then money mustnt be the question ?I know you cant concieve this either!What about single mothers and guy hords?Iassume the western values are decaying and you wont accept !!

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.16 seconds)