Examiner.com // 41 mins ago
Examiner.com // 56 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 18 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 44 mins ago
Daily News // 1 hr 56 mins ago
KTLA.com // 2 hrs 13 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 16 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs 32 mins ago
KTLA.com // 3 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Killer tree was flagged as danger
Article History
There are updates to this article.
A memorial to Kathleen Bolton lies near the Stern Grove tree that killed her with a falling branch.
(Beth Winegarner/The Examiner)
A memorial to Kathleen Bolton lies near the Stern Grove tree that killed her with a falling branch.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The Stern Grove redwood whose crashing branch killed a 50-year-old San Francisco woman earlier this month had significant structural defects and was at risk of falling, according to an arborist’s report.

Pleasanton-based HortScience identified 603 of Stern Grove’s 2,600 trees — including 95 redwoods — as potential hazards, according to a report crafted for San Francisco’s Recreation and Park Department in January 2004.

The tree whose branch fell and killed Kathleen Bolton on April 14 in the concert-meadow parking lot was described as “in decline, with extensive dieback of large branches and significant structural defects which cannot be abated,” according to the report.

“If The City knew this was a hazard, they should have done something to prevent what has happened,” said Kathy Skillicorn, one of Bolton’s close friends. “Her death was needless.”

While some Stern Grove trees with a “high” hazard rating were recommended for removal, the deadly one — and two next to it with the same rating — were recommended for an inspection of their upper limbs, according to the report.

HortScience recommended removing the majority of trees given a “very high” hazard rating within one year, and addressing “high” rated trees within three.

Jim Clark, a consultant for HortScience, said he did not know why the report recommended some trees for removal and not others.

City crews have been following the HortScience recommendations since they were made, according to Recreation and Parks Department Spokeswoman Rose Dennis.

“On an ongoing basis, all those trees are looked at,” Dennis said. “Our first line was dealing with the worst trees, which this tree was not. And the reality is [that] tree failure can happen at any time.”

Neighbors who walk regularly in Stern Grove say that falling branches — or even whole trees — are not uncommon. Felicia Zeiger said she was trapped in the concert-meadow parking lot for two hours March 17 after a eucalyptus branch crashed down, blocking the exit.

“For them to say it was a freak accident is baloney,” Zeiger said.

Bolton’s family is “devastated,” said Skillicorn, who would not discuss whether they are considering legal action against the city.

No claims have been filed with the City Attorney’s Office, according to spokesman Matt Dorsey.

Despite the warnings of some neighbors, Steven Haines, executive director of the annual Stern Grove Festival, said he’s optimistic that the accident won’t deter an estimated 100,000 from turning out to the concert meadow this summer.

bwinegarner@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:54 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Killer tree was flagged as danger"

Examiner Reader said:
Why do tree branches fall off? Mostly due to expanding/contracting of the wood.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:03 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Killer tree was flagged as danger"

Examiner Reader said:
Looks like another big settlement for the taxpayers to pay. We need new leadership in the city desperately. Please resign Newsom and dept heads.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:39 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Killer tree was flagged as danger"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey, good on the Examiner for digging up the information behind this avoidable tragedy. How come no other news outlet it the Bay Area could find out that for years the tree was a known hazard?

4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Tree limb snaps, kills woman"

Examiner Reader said:
So long as the Recreation and Park Department continues to maintain that the woman was killed by a "fluke," they won't do anthing to remove the ongoing threat to park visitors. They just deny responsibility and continue to irresponsibly do nothing. The trees in Stern Grove are individually identified according to their degree of hazard, including the one which killed the woman. RPD should refocus its priorities toward visitor safety. It makes no sense to cut down healthy, non-hazardous trees (as they have done in Stern Grove/Pine Lake)and leave the dangerous ones in the park.

8 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:10 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Killer tree was flagged as danger"

Examiner Reader said:
The Park Dept’s spokesperson claims that “on an ongoing basis all those trees are looked at.” I would like her repeat this bogus claim while sitting in the witness stand with her hand on the bible. Anyone who knows how short-handed and under-funded the Park Dept's Urban Forestry Division is, knows that this isn't true. The Urban Forestry crew barely has time to haul away the many trees that fall in the parks because they are full of hazardous trees like the one that killed Kathleen Bolton. The only thing unique about Stern Grove is that the Dept paid a highly qualified arborist good money to evaluate all the trees over 5 years ago, then ignored their advice. There are just as many dangerous trees in all the parks in the City. I'm also sorry that the Stern Grove Festival Assoc is “optimistic that the accident won’t deter" 100,000 from going to the concerts this summer. It's irresponsible of the Festival to even hold their concerts until the dangerous trees are removed.

6 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:47 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008 re: "Tree limb snaps, kills woman"

Examiner Reader said:
This incident was no "tragic fluke" as stated by Ms. Dennis on TV news. It's been a so-called fluke waiting to happen for years. On March 17 just a little over 3 weeks ago, the same potential "tragic fluke" happened as a friend and I were walking toward that same parking lot. A thunderous crash and huge branches fell into the entry road completely blocking it. This should have been a warning to Rec & Park. Within this past year a tree fell onto the other entry road at Vale St and a tree fell onto a walking path leading down to the parking lot where this sad incident happened. How much warning does RPD need to take notice and action? Each of these tree falling incidents had the potential to injure or kill. It's only luck so far that no person or car was in their path at the time. Calling this incident a fluke or freak accident covers up the fact that RPD has ignored the potential danger from at-risk, aging trees which exists every day for people who visit and walk in Stern Grove park

9 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)