ABC7.com // 28 mins ago
KTLA.com // 59 mins ago
KTLA.com // 39 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs ago
KTLA.com // 53 mins ago
The San Francisco Examiner // 54 mins ago
KTLA.com // 3 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 1 hr 8 mins ago
The San Francisco Examiner // 3 hrs ago
KTLA.com // 1 hr 16 mins ago
 
   
Commentary - Melanie Scarborough: Leftist activists unsympathetic to polygamist women in Texas
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - It all comes down to good PR. Sporting their prairie dresses and pompadours, the women of that Texas polygamist sect just aren’t cool enough to attract sympathy from the usual defenders of “non-traditional families.” Rosie O’Donnell isn’t running her bilious yap. The American Civil Libeties Union hasn’t filed any amicus briefs on behalf of the plural wives. Brad Pitt hasn’t vowed not to marry the mother of his children until polygamists also are free to wed.

Of course, their silence actually isn’t surprising: Members of the Texas sect are religious fundamentalists, which renders them ineligible for left-wing support. And let’s get real: Despite all their yammering about supporting laws enacted “for the sake of the children,” liberals, through their policies, represent the biggest threat to American youngsters since polio.

Before you roll your eyes and stop reading, consider this: Welfare programs implemented and maintained by leftists for more than 40 years have enabled, if not encouraged, unmarried teenage girls to have babies they cannot afford, whom they raise in dangerous and unhealthy environments. We know from research conducted by the Alan Guttmacher Institute and the American Journal of Public Health, among others, that adult males father two-thirds of the babies born to these school-age mothers. If we agree that it is awful for adult men to impregnate teenage girls in polygamist compounds, why isn’t it just as bad for adult men to impregnate teenage girls in housing projects?

Yet states don’t round up those young mothers and children and put them in protective custody. To the contrary, we send them a check every month and provide housing, groceries, medical care and dozens of other taxpayer-funded amenities. And we do so knowing that we’re rewarding foolish behavior and subsidizing calamity.

Children born to unwed teenage mothers are defined as being “at risk.” No one denies that those children are more likely to fail academically, to engage in criminal and other anti-social behavior, and to be the victims of child abuse or neglect. Yet while it is a crime in many localities to allow a child to ride a bicycle without wearing a helmet, almost no one condemns parents who selfishly produce children in circumstances that put the youngsters in automatic danger. Liberals might shake their heads and murmur sad nothings about children caught in neighborhood gunfire, but it is when middle-class parents smoke cigarettes in front of kids that leftists become outraged enough to take action. 

Consider, too, leftists’ typical support for illegal immigration, which also creates a demonstrably unhealthy environment for many children. According to the authors of a 2006 study in the Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, “U.S.-born children of Mexican immigrants who live in unmarried families may face exceptional risks. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study [a joint project of Princeton and Columbia universities], the authors find that … Mexican immigrant mothers have significantly lower levels of education and employment and much higher rates of poverty, as well as less access to social services. [Their children’s] poor socioeconomic and social service profile suggests that even when healthy at the starting gate, they may potentially face poor outcomes during childhood and beyond.”

The authors didn’t specify “illegal” immigrant, but their meaning is clear: If the mother were here legally, her access to social services would not be limited. Yet leftists continue to defend those who invade our country unlawfully, despite the harm that it evidently does to many of those immigrants’ children. 

Certainly, what appears to have been going on in that polygamist camp is indefensible.   Texas officials have an obligation to protect any women and children they suspect were being abused. But more than 50,000 babies are born in Texas each year to teenage mothers who aren’t members of a polygamist cult. Where is the outrage for the harm done to those girls — and for the harm the young mothers inflict on the children they raise in squalid environments?

While we may find the polygamists’ practices disgusting, let’s not be hypocritical: Millions of American children live in circumstances just as bad — if not worse — and we not only tolerate it; we pay for it. Shame on any parent who visit such damage on their children. Shame on us when we foot the bill.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

3:53 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Time Machine: Tim Russert's first week in heaven"

Examiner Reader said:
I wonder if he got the chance to see all the babies who were part of the pro choice movement, that he was so in favor of?

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:11 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Watching fireworks from the national holding pen"

Examiner Reader said:
It's gone beyond just 'Watching fireworks from the national holding pen'. The US has been defeated by Ossama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda - productivity/efficiency across America has plummeted (to the point of loan officers approving any loan in sight during 2005?-2007) and billions of dollars has been channeled into security. And Government Commissioners, Administrators, Executive Directors and plain ol' bureaucrats are inured (or accustomed) to protecting or expanding 'their' jobs and 'their' turf while the taxpayer suffers and Bin Laden rejoices.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:41 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008 re: "Caroline Crocker: Intellectual freedom must include conservative professors, scientists"

Examiner Reader said:
Robert Carnegie - What ID hoax would that be? Do you even know the definition of ID and what it's about?

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: Bye-bye, Mr. Unity Guy"

Bea Harris said:
Don't you just love the "fact" that someone, anyone with or without "backup" can present themselves as The Great Hope, Healer, Unifier, Know it all... and people acutally buy it? Incredible!! Also scary as heck!! If Hussein Obama can save anyone-- It's must be himself!!

6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:49 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Caroline Crocker: Intellectual freedom must include conservative professors, scientists"

Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@excite.com said:
I do not think that legitimate academic freedom can include freedom to be dishonest - to hoax students or colleagues. Most of the intelligent design doctrine, for instance, has been exposed case by case as a hoax.

5 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:26 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Caroline Crocker: Intellectual freedom must include conservative professors, scientists"

Examiner Reader said:
It is also true that medical school faculty members across the country have rejected ritual sacrifice in favor of the germ theory disease. Does this warrant affirmative action, in the name of "academic freedom", to ensure that snake handlers, witch doctors and faith healers are represented in our medical schools? Thanks for the laugh!

7 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008 re: "Caroline Crocker: Intellectual freedom must include conservative professors, scientists"

Examiner Reader said:
Given the "preponderance of liberal faculty", the vehemence against "academic freedom rights for those who are judged politically incorrect" is hard to understand. The effort for political correctness strikes me as based on deep feelings on insecurity. Is there no room for debate? Isn't a university supposed to provide a community searching for truth?

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:56 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: ACLU failing in defense of civil liberties at vital time"

Examiner Reader said:
So the author is upset because the Feds suspended the security clearance of some America-bashing Muslim cleric? Thanks for reminding us why most Americans consider the ACLU irrelevant at best, subversive at worst...

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:16 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Enron’s favorite bill gets its day in the sun"

Examiner Reader said:
Great Article. Figure out a way to get this information to the citizens of Florida. Cap and trade is on the way here right now. Please help!!!!!!

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:27 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Examiner Reader said:
A typical politician wanting to get his, what else is new. What a sick system we're all living in.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:18 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Examiner Reader said:
There should be no bailout program for anyone. Not banks, lenders, home buyers, nobody. Everyone made money making the loan and then again selling it off to someone else. The home buyer got into a home with almost no money down. Use to be that you had to have 20% down. Who has 20% of 600,000 or more! Who's salary went up by 300% when the house prices did. Why on earth would you think you could afford to pay that? You didn't! You were told that home prices will never go down.... or you can sell before you have to pay the adjusted rate and make a profit. Now you have to pay eariler and you don't want to. You can't sell because your house isn't worth as much. Neither is your car when you drive it off the lot, but you still have to pay that price! You gambled! And now you are or could lose. No one should be able to use TAX dollars to cover your dept! I have been saving for a home for 25 years. I didn't have enough when it was hard to get a loan. Didn't when I knew I couldn't affor

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:34 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: iPod, youPod, but must theyPod, too?"

Examiner Reader said:
Ha. Great column, Ms Cox Gurdon (again) hit on some of the issues we all seem to face, with a light and deft tone. I have a baby, can't wait to see for what age Apple markets "Baby's First iPod."

12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Tony said:
The title of this article is highly misleading. The results show more that liberals think it's okay to deny something of their state, not necessarily that they are liars. All the questions listed here pertain to specifically taxes. Biased surveys produced biased results.

13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:26 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Examiner Reader said:
Typical Dem.......

11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

jimbo likes bimbos said:
dodd is out there making like he's 'shocked' 'shocked' that anyone would think that he would ever do anything that would compromise his character or integrity. truth is, it was compromised many years ago when he and ted kennedy were rolling around the floor with waitress' in a restaurant in D.C. then he wonders why someone like him can't get more then 1% of the vote in primaries for president. always follow the money, follow the money, follow the money.

18 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:19 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Virginia Walden Ford: D.C. parents, students need Opportunity Scholarships"

Three Peasinapod said:
Thank you, Ms. Ford for such an eloquent and accurate depiction of our plight, as parents, in this fight for our rights to a choice in our children's education. My oldest daughter has been a recipient since 1994, entering 1st grade at St. Anthonys. She developed excellent study habits, one-on-one attention from her teachers, and a spiritually, physically and emotionally nurturing environment that also invited parental collaboration. Graduating from Archbishop Carroll High School, with honors, and she will continue her education at Howard University. I have two more children who participate in the Opportunity Scholarship program--one entering 2nd grade and the other starting 9th grade this fall. As a single parent, there is no way any of this would be possible for my family without the this program's assistance. My children are thriving, safe,exicited about their learning experiences, and have healthy self-esteem. We have a program that is working. Let us continue to have optio

14 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:46 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 22, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Fed Up said:
No bailouts for deadbeats and banks.

15 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Jeffrey Schrembs aka NOSTRADAMUSLIVES! said:
Well, well, well. Another Democratic caught with his hand, and mortgage, in the "cookie jar" AND his response is (see Barak Hussain Obama as well and his $ 300k land deal) "I didn't know"! Dodd is the HEAD of the "banking" committee and he didn't know? Come on! If it were a Republican they would be CRYING 24/7 for hearings after hearings after hearings. Dodd had amnesia, about the VIP loan, until it was uncovered that he KNEW in 2003. All of a sudden his "memory returned". I wish his DIGNITY and TRUTHFULNESS would return as well. Having been involved in the mortgage business, for over 20 years, there are MANY ways in which a "VIP" can benefit versus the "common folk". An example would be a "beneficial appraisal", low closing costs, low if no appraisal fee, low if no discount points, low if no origination fees, it goes on and on. Magically Dodd is sponsoring the Bank of America/COUNTRYWIDE bailout bill. WHAT a magical conincidence! Only in the US Senate, under "Democratic control"!

33 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:26 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

bv said:
Maybe Sen. Dodd agreed to split his profits with Sen. Shelby. I guess there is enough money to be made for everyone invloved in this bailout package.

23 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Andy Brown said:
I guess the elitist pig that wrote this article would rather have minimum wage hover around $5 for eternity meanwhile, the price of EVERYTHING continually goes up. Wow, great idea...all in the name of summer jobs for lazy teenagers. GET A CLUE LADY. Quit writing financial articles from your ivory tower.

20 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:19 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan"

Examiner Reader said:
to 11:03, could be that white kids only want to be movie stars and work is below their asperations. besides its illegal to employ kids under 18 unless their illegals. then they have no recourse if injured on the job. the old work ethic is gone in america. the ethic now is to look like you just got out of prison or are big bad gang member that cant work because his pants are down his knees and his jewelry will get in the way.their movie wont get any of my money or wages.

19 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:17 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

GMc7e said:
This isn't very surprising. One must remember that liberals and especially those that classify themselves as "very liberal" are much more likely not to believe in absolute truth. If you start with that, where would one expect to go? Party hardy today, for tomorrow you're dead!

19 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:03 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
I can't understand why there are then so many jobs for foreign kids during the summer months? Our employers house European and S. American workers during summer tourist season months in apartment complexes and private houses to supposedly supply their need for workers, all while our teenagers can't get jobs???

26 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:47 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Yes, we scan ... but we shouldn’t"

Anonymous said:
This goes back to the searches of automobiles without a warrant. Plainly unConstitutional - "and in their effects" - but the Supreme Court approved it anyway, and the States did not resist this illegal ruling. And now we have Homeland Security dealing with the weather and natural disasters. It was formed supposedly to make the FBI and CIA share information on terrorist plans. That limitation didn't last long. Before Carter we had Civil Defense - the citizens doing this sort of thing. He federalized it into FEMA, and now Homeland Security troops are doing it. We now have an all-encompassing federal internal police (and everything else)force. Just like the KGB, Stasi and Gestapo, all of which translate to 'homeland security'. This conservative is not remotely amused.

22 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:50 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
And I'm sure that the rising gas prices and poor economy in general has nothing to do with the decrease in summer job availability. How do you explain then why college grads are also struggling to find decent jobs?

21 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:26 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

Examiner Reader said:
I cant figure out if the article is trying to be sarcastic, but if you were trying to burn Obama and make him look bad you have failed miserably.

21 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:15 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Jindal may be the better Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
Jindal may be a crackpot.

24 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:48 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

David said:
The article failed to mention the J Visa. People come to the US from all over the world around May and leave in September. They arrive before the teens get out of school and leave when the teens return to school. The foreign born workers also work for minimum wage and in some cases less.

24 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:51 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: The games people try to play on gasoline"

Examiner Reader said:
Gas games are going to kill someone, guaranteed! unless every one knows what you are doing..NOTE: make up signs for you car calling it "gas games being used" and if all the same thinking people understand you will save yourself grief.

21 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:42 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Examiner Reader said:
It's my experience, among the generation of those with whom I graduated high school in 1967, is that "liberalism" can best be defined by the "normative values" from which a person determines to be liberated from! Truthfulness, particularly to the point of loosing some perceived or real advantage, monetary or social, seems to be among the very first things to go. When I've lied to others, this is what I've observed in myself. Once that basic commitment to truthfulness is overcome or even temporarily disabled, the next thing I see ,and have myself done, is "pretending", and a lot of it, until real accountability is forced on me. People who make a "life-style" of pretending are the ones I fear most, especially among those who vote - conservative or liberal. It seems that finding the real truth of a thing isn't as important to some as the images they want to maintain by pretention. Whatever the survey percentages, there's too much pretending and untruthfulness in both camp

27 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
One thing that I have noticed is that there are more adults taking on part time jobs that were normally reserved for teens (Fast food work, cashiers, ect.) I returned to a 2nd job delivering pizza's due to higher taxes imposed by the state and the city to fill their budget gaps. Years ago, many of the workers were in their late teens and early 20's. Today most of my co-workers at the pizza shop are in the 30's, 40's, and 50's. The manager told me that he would rather hire older people over teens because we have been in the work force and are easier to train and will cause less problems long term. Its not just the minimum wage that is affecting hiring options, its also the overspending by individuals and the government causing prices to rise and wages to remain stagnate.

23 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:21 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
Why hire American kids when you can pay illegals under the table to do the work?

25 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:43 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
There is an "800 Pound Gorilla" in the room that isn't being mentioned in the article. This is the wage gap between legal and illegal labor. Why would any seasonal business in their right minds hire an unskilled, undedicated teen for $8 an hour plus government-mandated SS, unemployment, taxes, etc., when they can hire a hard-working illegal alien for $5 per hour? For example, teens used to work in such jobs as landscaping. But today, as everyone knows, the majority of landscapers are illegals. The hardest hit are the African-American teens and this article ignores them. The author has her head in the sand. Or perhaps another agenda? Its going to be worse every year because there is no incentive to hire a teen.

26 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:56 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Examiner Reader said:
Give me a break! It's conservatives who do most of the whining about taxes. They don't have to "cheat" on their taxes, because they have "legal" means of tax avoidance. Apparently, the author also doesn't consider the questionable business practices of Enron, or the perpretraitors (I spelled it correctly) of the sub-prime mortgage mess examples of dishonesty. I would also like to see the way the author's push poll questions were worded, because I don't know anyone who thinks it's OK to drink a can of soda you didn't pay for, or receive welfare benefits you don't qualify for.

19 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:18 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Examiner Reader said:
You do realize that this argument is about which politicians are honest, and which political stripe is deluded??? How bizarre. A man is worth as much as his word. Best the worthless lying buggers take up politics so they get out of industry.

19 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:40 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
Okay, you totally lost the argument when you ranted about "the mandated wage hikes that policymakers have forced down the throats of local businesses", as if paying an employee a decent wage for a decent day's work is a bad thing.

24 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:52 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Independent against left/right said:
If Obama is elected the country will be in bad shape... News flash... It is in bad shape! When Mccain gets elected and sends us to Iran, Ann Coulter and all the conservatives who voted for him should be drafted and if they refuse thehy should be waterboarded and held in prison without a trial indefinitely.

22 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:55 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
This is another bad article where people disregard 10 facts then single on fact out as "the reason". The reason there are no summer jobs has nothing to do with minimum wage. It has everything to do with livable wage! Corporations have gutted livable wage by sending jobs overseas to countries who have no comparable benefits, laws, and regulation. So all of the $8-25ph jobs are gone. The government has also turned a blind eye to illegal immigration, no fault of the immigrant, and let companies hire under the table wage earners. What does that leave for Americans? I will tell you. 01. A 30 year old doing a teenagers job. 02. You not being able to talk(in English)to anyone at McDonald's or cutting your grass. 03. Teenagers competing with grown folks for what used to be transient jobs, but due to outsourcing, are now bread and butter jobs. This is more "FREE TRADE" propaganda where they omit the FACT that we need FREE AND *EQUAL* TRADE! China has no problem limiting imports. Why do we

26 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:02 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The bad decisions Obama is making long before choosing a veep"

Examiner Reader said:
Melanie certainly hit the 'nail on the head' with this article! I am not an Obama follower and this country will be in sad shape should he be elected. He has once again, in this committee, to have poor judgement. If he can't choose a committee, why does he think he can run the country?????

29 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:56 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Barack Obama said:
Econ 101 taught most of us this - If you artificially raise wages, one of two thins will happen, either prices will go up or jobs will be cut. Either way, it's the poor that get screwed. Nonetheless, politicians love to push minim-wage laws because it's a great way to buy votes.

33 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:57 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The bad decisions Obama is making long before choosing a veep"

Examiner Reader said:
Funny, now that Senator Obama has thoroughly trounced the "great white female hope" in the presidential primary, people like you start the negative comments. This time it's selection committee candidates. I say, so what if they're not the status quo; those are the types that have put this country in the economic hole that it's in. Those are the types that created the distain that other countries now have for the US. Those are the types that have us in so many wars that some country like North Korea will, feel bold enough to "challenge us." Maybe what America needs is new uncompromised thinking from people not taited by the politics of old. Senator Obama is running on a platform of change, inovation, creativity, and a new vision for America which can't happen with recyled politicans and individuals. Many of you pundits thought that he could't win the Democratic nomination, but he did. Likewise, the future will determine the validity of his political decisions.

24 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:02 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Examiner Reader said:
I think that this study completely disregards age. It is a fact that people in college are more inclined to vote liberally whereas the older you become, the more conservative the mindframe. "Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains." I believe that these issues of "morality" and "dishonesty" are due to youth rather than libral mindframes. It is also a fact that every rising generation differs from the one before due to new technologies, ideas, and politics. Especially with this generation's enfatuation with free information, it cannot be expected that the older generations will understand, or the younger kids will compromise. I would really like to see this study given to young republicans and young democrats, and then see the difference between them. I bet that the percentage would radically change.

21 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:24 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Kristen Lopez Eastlick: Dude, where’s my summer job?"

Examiner Reader said:
What about lawn care, sitting with children, house painting, and other jobs where teens can say they are in business for themselves? These jobs are not affected by minimum wage increases. Nor are jobs as wait staff. Instead, the real factor in these types of jobs drying up is our rotten economy. The average person cannot afford to hire help, not even local teens. Money is so tight, we're doing it ourselves or doing without. And those minimum wage jobs? Well a lot of adults are making do with two or three of those jobs because their jobs were sent overseas.

29 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "When lawsuit-abuse purgatory is an improvement"

Examiner Reader said:
Not sure of A