
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - In the wake of a fatal Christmas Day tiger mauling, the San Francisco Zoo has spent nearly $2 million in security upgrades, an official said.
Increased staffing for after-hour shifts, a centrally located gun safe, direct access to the local police station and a handheld pendant that can trigger a code-red alarm with the touch of a button are some of the improvements San Francisco Zoo officials are implementing as a way to improve security at the facility.
“We have put forth a substantial effort to improve the functionality of the facility,” said Jesse Vargas, director of operations from the San Francisco Zoo.
The efforts are part of an ongoing reassessment of the zoo’s procedural strategy since the Christmas Day escape of a 250-pound Siberian tiger led to the fatal mauling of a visitor and serious injuries to his two friends, zoo officials told the Recreation and Park Commission on Thursday.
As part of the new changes, all zoo officials that work with a “code red” animal, meaning any creature that could be of harm to the public, have access to a device that if held down for two seconds will send out a security alarm blasted over the facility’s loudspeakers, Vargas said.
The zoo also changed its radio codes to better coordinate with the nearby Taraval Police Station, and increased the number of employees working after the close of the facility from one to two, Vargas said. Another could be on the way, he said.
A hot-line number is now visible at all zoo exhibits, so visitors can call security officials anytime they see an animal being harassed, Vargas said.
A recent report released by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums expressed disapproval at the zoo for having 29 of its 31 animal-care personnel and two of its three veterinarians off work when Tatiana, the 4-year-old Siberian tiger, escaped from her grotto and killed 17-year-old Carlos Sousa Jr.
Last month, the two surviving members of the attack, Kulbir Dhaliwal, 23, and Paul Dhaliwal, 19, of San Jose, filed a claim against The City — which has joint responsibility of the zoo — citing issues of negligence, defamation and property grievances.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:27 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008 re: "S.F. Zoo fighting to contain animals"
Report as inappropriate
5:27 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 15, 2008
re: "S.F. Zoo fighting to contain animals"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 14, 2008
re: "S.F. Zoo fighting to contain animals"
Report as inappropriate
6:02 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 7, 2008
re: "Mayor calls for hearings about zoo’s response"
Report as inappropriate
Andrew Plumridge said:
It is completely irrelevant whether or not the brothers were taunting the tiger on Christmas Day. In law the victim and the two brothers have a right to be protected from attack irrespective of their behaviour, and any failure by the zoo to provide that protection constitutes negligence. If the owners and management of the zoo had been forewarned about security failures and done nothing about it, that constitutes gross negligence. In either event, both the law and natural justice is clear in that through the simple fact that the tiger escaped on the day in question, the victim and the two brothers were not adequately protected and the zoo is therefore culpable. "Res es videlicet" (Latin = the facts speak for themselves).
4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
DownWithALF said:
Arrest Mollinedo. The problems with the zoo got far worse on his watch, and monies from public bonds have been mis allocated. Culminating in negligent homicide. Mr. Mollendo, you belong in the Grey Bar Hotel.
66 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The brothers haven't been cleared, the investigation has barely begun. We've got a long ways to go before we get to the truth. It's all about 'due process' which is very slow.
64 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Juan Pescadino said:
Police have now officially cleared the brothers of involvement through taunting. The zoo needs to be held accountable for its lack of security, its failure to cooperate, its failure to respond and for all the cover up lies the director and his minions spewed to the press and the public.
78 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree