Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
United Airlines has asked the U.S. Department of Transportation for permission to delay its daily roundtrip flights from San Francisco International Airport to Guangzhou, China, which were scheduled to begin June 18 and June 20. In its request, United said it would instead like to launch the service before June 30, 2009.
United cited the same factors that have caused several popular airlines to hike ticket prices, reduce the number of free luggage or even cease operations: skyrocketing jet fuel costs and the slumping U.S. economy.
The move could lead to other airlines delaying launch dates of new service, said San Francisco-based industry analyst Henry Harteveldt with Forrester Research.
Jet Airways has already delayed its SFO to Mumbai route from May 5 until at least June 14. That, however, was done for administrative reasons and was not related to fuel costs, the airline said.
Emirates Airlines will also launch flights to Dubai in the coming months. Airport spokeswoman Kandace Bender said she is not worried about Jet Airways or Emirates Airlines delaying the start of the new flights.
SFO officials said that despite myriad problems facing U.S. airlines, the airport has reached an all-time high of international travel, topping a previous record set in 2000.
United paid about $72 per barrel on oil in 2007 but now pays in excess of $100 per barrel, spokesman Jeff Kovick said. That amounts to an anticipated annual fuel cost increase of $2 billion, he said.
The Department of Transportation received United’s request to delay the China route Tuesday and the public has seven days to comment before the agency decides whether to grant the delay, DOT spokesman Bill Mosley said.
Harteveldt said the DOT has to also consider China’s interest in the deal when deciding whether to grant the extension.
United flies nine routes from SFO to Asia, including Hong Kong, Shanghai and Tokyo.



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:53 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"
Report as inappropriate
1:11 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008
re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"
Report as inappropriate
12:49 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008
re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"
Report as inappropriate
10:01 AM MST on Mon., May. 26, 2008
re: "Passengers are not happy with SFO"
Report as inappropriate
8:37 AM MST on Mon., May. 26, 2008
re: "Passengers are not happy with SFO"
Report as inappropriate
12:58 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Virgin takes off while competitors lay low"
Report as inappropriate
11:38 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Lawsuit talk buzzing about airport noise"
Report as inappropriate
5:26 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008
re: "Bay Area reacts to rescheduling"
Report as inappropriate
7:03 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "2 flights grounded at SFO"
Report as inappropriate
1:00 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "2 American Airlines flights grounded at SFO"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I agree, Southwest aircraft, besides the Boeing 737-700, are pretty beat up and ghetto. Flying Virgin is the only way to go, clean new Airbus Aircraft, freindly staff, and tons of entertainment onboard. I only wish they flew to other destnations out of San Diego.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wai Yip Tung said:
Of course they do fly to New York.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
But the low cost carriers out of SFO do not fly to places like Chicago, New York, or do they?
4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
truly poor vender selection,food services extremely limited.... one only needs to travel outside of the U.S. to make a comparison ie zurich, heathrow vender food serivice quite varied... services in sfo are sooo predictably bland off the shelf vendors and services... ray okamoto frequent flyer
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I read this in the printed copy. It shows Philli coming in first. No wonder the managers at SFO are taking shots at the study. Not like SFO would be a jewel by the sea... but Philli?
10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I find Virgin America a bunch of fun to fly!
12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Go for it! The noise over Montara and Moss Beach has become unbearable on some days. And the claim that the airport cares and calls back is BS. I have called them on really bad days and not once have they had the courtesy to return a call and discuss the issues. They deserve what is coming for them.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Once again the genius of the marketplace has brought us the current state of u.s. airlines. I suspect many of us flyers would be willing to pay a bit more not to be left waiting at the gate.
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
southwest is super ghetto with the lack of seat assignments, while it's lax it is not efficient and planes look beat up and in poor shape
73 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Southwest....is the only way to go!
94 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree