Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Eugene Waller, 50, of Baltimore, told his family members he loved them as he was taken away in handcuffs.
“I’ll miss you. I’ll be praying for you,” his 85-year-old mother told him. His daughter blew him a kiss.
Waller could have faced life in prison for first-degree rape, but he entered a plea Friday to a reduced charge of second-degree rape because a surveillance tape revealed Waller and the victim holding hands before the incident.
“The reason I pleaded guilty was because I didn’t want to end up with life in prison,” Waller told Anne Arundel Circuit Judge William Mulford II in an emotional ramble twice interrupted and redirected by his attorneys.
The defense instead asked Mulford to impose probation, but Mulford said Waller “would probably never be rehabilitated,” citing his two rape convictions in 1977 and 1983. Waller, who was mistakenly left off the state’s sex offender registry, must register as a violent sex offender.
Mulford also noted the impact the rape has had on the victim, who was a recovering drug addict.
“I have night terrors and cannot get his face out of my mind,” the victim said in a statement read by Assistant State’s Attorney Laura Kiessling.
“He deceived me into thinking he was a nice person, but his personality flipped like a light switch, and it was too late.”
The woman, 23, initially told Anne Arundel police she was sitting at the Nursery Road station Oct. 9, when a stranger dragged her into the woods, held a weapon to her neck and raped her, according to charging documents.
But a Royal Farms surveillance tape showed Waller and the victim trying unsuccessfully to buy beer before the rape occurred, said defense attorney Elizabeth Palan.
After riding the train to the Nursery Road station and purchasing beer at a liquor store, they walked behind the light rail station where Waller struck the victim and threatened to kill her. He dragged her into the woods and raped her, Kiessling said.
Waller was charged with indecent exposure on another light rail train in Anne Arundel days before the October rape, but he was acquitted on a technicality, as the train had passed over the county line.
cpeirce@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
6:40 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 13, 2008 re: "First-degree rape charges dropped in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
7:16 AM MST on Sun., Apr. 13, 2008
re: "First-degree rape charges dropped in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
10:11 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "First-degree rape charges dropped in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
8:08 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "First-degree rape charges dropped in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
6:25 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "First-degree rape charges dropped in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
6:14 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "Rape suspect had been released by judge last week"
Report as inappropriate
3:52 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "Rape suspect had been released by judge last week"
Report as inappropriate
9:46 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 16, 2007
re: "Rape suspect had been released by judge last week"
Report as inappropriate
4:00 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 11, 2007
re: "Rape suspect had been released by judge last week"
Report as inappropriate
The Undertaker said:
Why did the State continue to press charges after it was obvious that the so-called victim lied about an extremely important fact? Who could trust the word of such a person? How do we know it wasn't rough sex that she regretted later? Hopefully, Mulford will go light on this guy given all of the facts.
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Caspare said:
there any doubt what would have happened if she hadn't run away?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don't know nakia, or what he writes, but anyone can hit the inappropriate link and if there are constant hits, then they may block it. I disagree all the time, and have never been blocked. Perhaps its nakia's content people don't like.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
just as an information point. Say something on the Examiner post that they do not agree with and you will have your IP blocked. While I was no fan of Nakia she had her IP blocked. It is their site and have the rights and the power.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Department of Justice needs to create a special department within itself that spcecifically focuses on sexual assault and rape investigations. Just like the Justice Department has the Drug Enforcement Agency for illegal narcotics investigations, it needs to have a special department for sexual assault and rape investigations. Present statistics are a s follows: An average of 1 in 6 women report being raped every year. However, seeing as how most rapes are not reported, it is estimated that actually 1 in 4 women are raped every year. And, in the rape cases that are reported, the conviction rate is about 5 or 6 percent. That is a deplorable conviction rate! I believe this low conviction rate is why many women don't report their rapes. They know there will probably be no conviction, so why bother? If men were being raped with such frequency and the conviction rate was that low, I believe most of the Justice Department's investigative resources would be geared toward solving the rap
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Another Judge who could not find their butt blind folded with both hands free. Common sense and fairness don't show up much more in our judicial system.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sue said:
What can I say? This is Baltimore City at Its best.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mass transportation in the state of Maryland is not only terrible, it has also become dangerous. When was the last time that you saw any type of police presence whether it be on the trains or in the parking areas? Gangs of teenagers ride the train and the regular commuters who use the train to go to work everyday get to put up with their rudeness and obnoxious and threatening behavior which includes being pushed down the train steps. The MTA has been contacted on several occasions and they are not really interested. They tell you that they are not babysitters. I originally lived in New York and can honestly say that this is the worst public transportation system that I have ever dealt with. The drivers of the Light Rail are pretty rude too. I can't tell you the number of times that it is pouring rain and I am pushing the door button on the train to board and the driver deliberately drives off. Maybe it is time to start thinking about driving or carpooling. It would be safer.
21 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The judge's action is irrelevant because even if the guy had been found guilty, he would have been fined or otherwise allowed to walk.
65 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree