DNA yields arrest in Roland Park rape case
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Baltimore police have charged a 46-year-old man with committing an armed home invasion rape in Roland Park — half a year after DNA evidence cleared the man previously arrested in the case.

Roger Ervin, of the 3500 block of Dudley Avenue in Baltimore, was held without bail Monday after police found a DNA match in the state’s database tying him to the crime, according to charging documents.

Neither police nor prosecutors wanted to comment on the case, citing its sensitive nature.

At about 8 p.m. Aug. 23, a 59-year-old grandmother was in her kitchen on the 700 block of Colorado Avenue when two unknown men entered her home, and one raped her during a robbery, police said.

The woman had returned home from shopping and left her keys in the front door while retrieving groceries, police said.

After unloading the items, she began making dinner — and while standing at the stove, she heard footsteps behind her, according to court documents.

“When she turned around, the suspects were in her kitchen, both pointing handguns at her,” Detective Sarah Connolly wrote in charging documents.

The suspects took her wallet — which had $7 in it — and then one forced her upstairs, where he raped her, police said.

During the attack, the woman told the suspects that she “was a grandmother and was to have a party for her grandchildren”; that she couldn’t get up because she felt “paralyzed”; and begged, “please don’t rape me,” charging documents state.

Police initially charged Chaz Ricks, 20, of Gwynn Oak, as a suspect after the victim provided a description of her attackers. A sketch artist depicted a rendering of a suspect, which a detective identified as Ricks, police said.

But prosecutors dropped all charges against Ricks a month later after DNA evidence proved he was not involved.

On March 11, police received notice that Ervin’s DNA matched the rapist’s.

Ervin’s DNA was on file due to his 1985 conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon in Baltimore County and his conviction for conspiracy to commit theft in Anne Arundel County in 1992, court records show.

The detectives brought in the victim for a photo array, but she said she could not identify Ervin out of the suspects’ pictures, police said.

Based on the DNA evidence, officers then obtained a warrant for Ervin’s arrest, charging documents state.

lbroadwater@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:09 AM MST on Fri., May. 23, 2008 re: "Suspect indicted in rape of Roland Park grandmother"

Examiner Reader said:
How ignorant can you be, to want a man to never walk the streets again just because he is black. He hasn't been found quilty of anything yet and probably won't be found quilty. Everyone deserves a chance in life to be free especially if they haven't done anything wrong. Seems to be you are reading what the news is stating and believing it, which is not all the time the truth. I have found that to be the case in so many indicidents. I watch the news all the time local and world news so I know they don't always report the whole truth. Try to be more open minded with issues, not just this one.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008 re: "DNA yields arrest in Roland Park rape case"

Examiner Reader said:
Why are you stuck on one person. Couldn't there be more persons with the same DNA that could be out there and could have rape that woman? I would like to know that out of thousands of DNA in baltimore, how did you narrow it down to one person. Yet the woman could not identify him in a line up, but did identfy the one that was let go.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:31 AM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Suspect indicted in rape of Roland Park grandmother"

Examiner Reader said:
the balt city jurors will find in innocent because he didn't have a father growing up and the system is locking up all the black males. as a black male i hope he never walks the streets again.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)