
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - An unpopular proposal to increase meter rates citywide by 50 cents has been shelved by Muni officials, who are counting, instead, on a program of costlier parking stays during peak travel times in certain parts of The City to help make up a budget shortfall.
The variable-pricing scheme is part of Muni’s SFpark program, a collection of pilot projects that will be implemented this September. Motorists can expect higher hourly rates for meters during peak times in the morning, but summarily less for parking during slower times in the afternoon. A parking meter could charge $3.50 an hour from 8 to 10 a.m., but only $1 an hour from 7 to 9 p.m., according to a hypothetical example provided in San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency documents.
SFpark will be implemented in 6,425 on-street metered spaces — about 25 percent of all The City’s meters — and in 11,667 spaces in SFMTA-managed parking garages and lots, according to department documents. The SFpark pilot programs will include programs that allow drivers to access available parking information online and pay for meters using cell phones.
Initially projected to have an $81 million shortfall over the next two fiscal years, the SFMTA has reconciled that gap in part by adding $10 to all parking fines, implementing a $10 raise to Muni’s 30-day Fast Pass and increasing costs for residential parking permits. On Tuesday, the increases will be voted on, within a two-year budget proposal, by the department’s board of directors.
Originally forecasted to bring the department an extra $10 million in the 2009-10 fiscal year, the financial expectations of the SFpark program have now increased to $13 million, to offset the $3 million decrease from not implementing the across-the-board meter-rate increases.
Mayor Gavin Newsom, who earlier this week met with Muni officials to express his disdain for citywide meter increases, said the variable-pricing pilot program was a justifiable way to raise parking rates.
“I believe people are concerned this is a backhanded way to pay more for meters, but that’s not our intention,” Newsom told The Examiner. “It’s a more thoughtful, targeted way to take advantage of technology, and I’m hopeful this will change people’s behavior in a positive way.”
SFMTA Executive Director Nathaniel Ford told The Examiner that “SFpark is a great opportunity for The City to move forward with actual congestion pricing.”
Of SFpark’s $23 million total costs, $18.4 million will be provided by federal grant money. The pilot programs will last two years, at which time the SFMTA will evaluate the effectiveness of each program and decide which ones it will further enhance, Ford said.

Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
5:32 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Four injured in cable car derailment"
Report as inappropriate
7:40 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008
re: "Muni Ladies preach proper bus behavior"
Report as inappropriate
11:29 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008
re: "Four injured in cable car derailment"
Report as inappropriate
5:54 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008
re: "Muni Ladies preach proper bus behavior"
Report as inappropriate
2:15 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008
re: "Muni Ladies preach proper bus behavior"
Report as inappropriate
11:43 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008
re: "Muni contract talks stay off track for a second day"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008
re: "Muni Ladies preach proper bus behavior"
Report as inappropriate
11:14 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Glitch disrupts cable car line"
Report as inappropriate
3:36 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Muni accident probe to focus on operator"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Answers delayed in Muni accident"
Report as inappropriate
1:00 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Answers delayed in Muni accident"
Report as inappropriate
12:51 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Answers delayed in Muni accident"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Answers delayed in Muni accident"
Report as inappropriate
9:39 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008
re: "Trial run positive for double-deckers"
Report as inappropriate
9:38 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008
re: "Trial run positive for double-deckers"
Report as inappropriate
5:31 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008
re: "Driver rides Muni tracks to dead end"
Report as inappropriate
1:13 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008
re: "Muni contract talks stay off track for a second day"
Report as inappropriate
6:02 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008
re: "Muni contract talks stay off track for a second day"
Report as inappropriate
4:01 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008
re: "Local transit agencies receive state transportation funds"
Report as inappropriate
3:26 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008
re: "Muni contract talks stay off track for a second day"
Report as inappropriate
2:58 PM MST on Tue., May. 27, 2008
re: "Bus-car crash hurts pedestrian"
Report as inappropriate
7:03 PM MST on Mon., May. 19, 2008
re: "State bond money to fund Muni fare box rehab project"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Muni may have new light-rail route with historic cars"
Report as inappropriate
11:20 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008
re: "Public voice may alter Muni’s plans"
Report as inappropriate
10:40 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008
re: "Public voice may alter Muni’s plans"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008
re: "Muni deployments leave buses vulnerable"
Report as inappropriate
11:16 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Underperforming Muni routes fall victim to transit project findings"
Report as inappropriate
10:51 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Muni deployments leave buses vulnerable"
Report as inappropriate
9:52 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Muni deployments leave buses vulnerable"
Report as inappropriate
1:07 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008
re: "Underperforming Muni routes fall victim to transit project findings"
Report as inappropriate
8:16 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 26, 2008
re: "Underperforming Muni routes fall victim to transit project findings"
Report as inappropriate
11:39 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008
re: "Parking meter prices will depend on what time it is"
Report as inappropriate
9:33 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Bloody Muni accident is 19th this year"
Report as inappropriate
5:15 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Bloody Muni accident is 19th this year"
Report as inappropriate
2:54 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Bloody Muni accident is 19th this year"
Report as inappropriate
1:02 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Bloody Muni accident is 19th this year"
Report as inappropriate
11:20 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
9:36 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
9:35 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "Driver suffers from case of tunnel vision"
Report as inappropriate
7:36 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 17, 2008
re: "MTA considers $21M payout in ’03 Muni death"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 11, 2008
re: "Report: Public transit ridership up in U.S., but not for Muni"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
3:15 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
6:12 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
5:03 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008
re: "Is Fast Pass a quick fix for budget?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Last friday night going, I rode BART to 24th/Mission. Per NextBus, the outbound 48 was arriving, only there was't a 48 in sight and the next one due in 22 mins. After walking to 24th/Dolores without an arriving 48, NextBus was displaying next outbound 48 was in 44 mins and 77 mins. Which schedule would that be because I doubt its MUNI's. Oh, that's right, MUNI doesn't have a schedule, MUNI has predictions
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Goodness, MUNI Manners is suddenly everywhere. Almost as if someone is giving a product a professional push.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Typical Muni operators at work.
2 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
it's admirable someone is noticing rude behavior on the muni. try the 30-stockton line. there have been outbreaks from here to racial and everything else about the community with bad conduct to bad body odor. the muni ladies are saints for trying. passengers will even smear the pretty boy face of the daa mayor if it came to it. he's not immune.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a regular MUNI rider, I have no love for people who stand in front of the back doors who don't get off the bus for a long while, who don't move over to the window seat, who take up two seats during a rush hour commute, graffiti taggers with smelly pens, people who blast music out loud, people who block the aisles by holding with two hands across the aisles, people who don't take off bulky backpacks on crowded buses while standing, people who board the back door without paying, the occasional unwashed aromatic homeless person, the occasional insane outspokingly profane homeless person, loud cell phone callers, and people who don't use two hands to push the rear doors open to get off. Other than that, MUNI is a joy to ride...when it arrives on time.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The overall attitude on MUNI from employees to ridership might well improve if the service improved and brought down the levels of frustration. This isn't really rocket science, is it?
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Some good tips - thank you, ladies! I do hate it when I have to give up my seat because of some boorish behavior that I have no control over, except to move to another location. Thank goodness I live relatively central to everything, so I don't have to endure unpleasant behaviors for too long.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
MrHyphy said:
Good thing i dont ride those and for those who do.... hahahahhahahahha =]
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wonder how much all these reports are costing the city? When its all said and done, the monies might have made a good dent in repairing the damaged cars.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well the reason is known but to who? Surly the City atty who'll deal with all the law-suits! My bet is both Ford and Newsom know but it's about what with the union and the likes how to go public
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
exactly the union will try to spin out of it!!! There atty's are in full spin mode cuz after there saying we want more money and no punishment for abusive drivers! It should be interesting Ford now must prove his worth!!! Anf of course Gavlin being a union man is caught dead center of the deal!!!
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I suspect the explanation for the accident is fairly self-evident. More likely, MUNI and the UNION are seeking a "satisfactory" explanation to give the public. Its not necessarily so much about "truth" as it is "spin," especially with the city and the union in negotiations over a contract.
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Smells like a cover-up the driver is still alive and yet no answers hmmm or has the union shut him up
11 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The agree and Disagree columns are fake, there are people who go through these columns counterpointing every argument.
6 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
Double Decker buses with a capacity of 80? Last time I was riding the 9x on Stockton Street through Chinatown seemed like 80 people climbed on through one of the back doors before I could even get off the bus. Instead of this generic PR fluff piece about MUNI's future gimmick why not a story about the terrible conditions on the buses, i.e. 30, 9X 45 that run through Chinatown that during the day are overflowing? How about a phtograph or two? Is the EXAMINER too cheap or to incompetent to use a digital camera and uppload the photo's on it's website? How is it in the days of I-Phones and U-TUBE the EXAMINER and the Chronicle produce such stale news reporting. When TV news was in its infancy that the reporters and producers had to be reminded, since they came from print and radio, that TV is a visual medium. Guess what? So is the internet. With a hundred dollar video camera and some cheap software the EXAMINER could produce some news that's undeniable because you can see (and hear) it
5 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
this goes to show that after the age of 60 the dmv should make these drivers take the drive test every year for free but every year.
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Muni operators (and management) are the most INCOMPETENT over-payed employees on this side of... yeah. Get a friggin' clue. And get a REAL transit system that's reliable and not run by a bunch of jackasses.
11 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr Ford says only a "handful" of operators are a problem? I'm thinking Mr. Ford doesn't actually ride MUNI.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How about inproving rest rooms on the bart system. It really sucks
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This morning I headed into work at 1030 a.m. not my usual 9 am. (at this time of day i take BART) but this morning I thought hey I will just go to church/market metro; WHAT DID I SEE; delay and more delay at 1030 a.m. in the morning; I couldnt' believe and not even rush hour! When is this jelly fish of a mayor going to stand up to the UNIONS and say no more! Now they want more money! OBLISH ALL UNIONS, that is a good start to get MUNI back working
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This morning headed to work the 48-line buses were, not so unusually, running back to back, with the first bus passing us by for the second. We boarded the already full second bus where apparently the bus driver's friend was making entry difficult while they talked away. By the time we reached 24th/Mission, the second bus was once again right behind the first bus which had passed us by. its now been 1.5 years since Mr. ford has taken over looking towards a new and improved MUNI, as far as i can tell, not much has changed.
10 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
And I thought the drivers were just acting out when they passed you by wihtout paying. How devious the managment at letting the drivers take the blame for their incompetence.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mass transit, not cutsy street cars, please. Everybody's squeezing into the Market street tunnel because the street cars take forever to get down the strip. Hard to believe we're supposed to get more of that.
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
They should not dismiss many lines that connect major lines in the City. For instance the 66 Quintara connects not the two major lines in the Sunset which is the L Taraval & N Judah but also the 6 Parnassus, 28 on 19th Avenue, 43 on Masonic and the 44 O'Shaughnessy. Let us say there is a problem on both the L-Taraval and the N-Judah, at least the 66 Quintara can connect those other connects so the Sunset Residents can at least get home.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Please save the 26-Valencia. It is the safer alternative to the 14-Mission for senior citizens going to the Social Security office and St. Luke's Hospital.
10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Please, no one had addressed the NO CALL, NO SHOW allowance for MUNI drivers. And where else can you have the head of a company/department get a pay increase/bonus for having the company/department under performing by nearly 20% of what is required.
12 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sometimes the only way to get on the bus is through the back. Maybe people who hold up a pass should be free to use the backdoor. That could make things faster and less crowded at the front of the bus, allow inspectors at the back to more easily identify true fare evaders, and incidentally satisfy a few fellow riders who apparently assume the worst of everyone using the backdoor.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Goodbye 66 bus.
7 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
4:29 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "Muni worker lauded for saving blind man" M.S. Jackson said: The article should have been entitled, "Person saves blind man, can you believe it was a Muni Employee?" We have a boss (Deputy Chief Antonio Parra) that says that we are only Fare Inspectors and that is only what we do. The inspector took this action as a fellow citizen helping another citizen. We, fare inspectors and parking control officers, need D/C Parra out. He wants both departments to fail so that SFPD can take over. BTW, he make $200K+
12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just stand at 24th & Mission, waiting for the 48 bus, any given morning...there's always about 10-20 folks that enter the bus by the back door. Believe me, no one is taking their money for riding the bus! It's the same on every line - no one solution exists except to keep the back doors closed, and make everyone exit from the front door, and then let on the new passengers, which would ensure that they would pay. Perhaps if the MUNI bus drivers got off their cell phones once in a while, they could actually pay attention to their jobs and collect fares, avoid hitting pedestrians while driving, and have the time and energy to be pleasant to their customers. It makes one want to drive their car to work!
18 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I've lived here long enough to have experienced MUNI re-orgs and they've only, at best, marginally improved service. Mostly they've been used to eliminate routes in lieu of hopefully, improving others, which really hasn not proved to be the case. With the city hundres of millions of dollars in debt, I'm guessing this will once again prove to be the case once again.
10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
AKo said:
I love the fact that their community meetings are at 10:30am. Conveniently located but boy I wonder who will show up since the likes of you and I are where?...AT WORK! Nice time to have meetings if you want to push throught policy and hide your shady shenanigans.
13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wai Yip Tung said:
It is a no-brainer deciscion to cancel a route with 15 riders. Examiner should better spend time to cover the other 15,000 frustrated riders those communte will finally be improved due to the change.
14 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Parking fees are an easy, but never effective way of dealing with a budget shortfall.
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i believe good samaritan laws can keep bystanders from otherwise responding in such situations. in some jurisdictions, lay people offering assistance are not immune from liability.
14 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Rebecca East said:
Problems with the MUNI system aside, Erika Galt, my niece, was shocked by the complete lack of assistance from bystanders, even as she was screaming for someone to assist her while she attempted to tend to the seriously injured man. She did what I would have assumed that anyone would have done, come to the aid of a seriously injured stranger on a public street. Apparently that assumption does not hold true for the citizenry of San Francisco. Her actions were a result of pure, unselfish human kindness, the kind that goes unnoticed and unrewarded all the time. I am proud of what she did and would have expected nothing less from anyone else.
18 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
muni drivers are the worst...i have seen them driving while eating, drinking coffee and talking on their cell phones. why all the suprprise when they hit or kill a pedestrian, muni drivers have always thought they own the road and then there is the MUNI ATTITUDE...which is like "I have to drive this bus all day, so accept my obnoxious rude self. Well this system is so screwed up that it would take a miracle to fix it or gavin newsom stealing more money from them to pay his silly staff!!!!!
15 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Time to add the word "Municide" to the lexicon.
14 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl said:
"Examiner Reader said: This is stupid. Everyone benefits from MUNI. The more people who ride MUNI, the more parking spaces are available, the less traffic and accidents, better environment".---you cant afford a car eh?
11 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ya' gotta love MUNI, yet another gorey accident. MUNI appears to be its own worst enemy. Why so often does it at least seem the driver is the last one to know they've run someone over?
11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Alex said:
Oh boy, yesterday riding muni at 10MPH in the tunnel I was thinking that it is sort of April 1st joke.
11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl said:
My sincere condolences to the Dominguez family. 20 comment and not one showing sympathy for their terrible loss. And outsiders wonder why San Francisco is self centered.
13 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
logicbomb said:
Do 2.7 million people really ride Muni daily?
12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Instead of punishing the regular Muni riders, why doesn't Muni increase the single-ride fare up to $2, but provide discounts for those who buy several rides at one time (in New York, when buying a MetroCard with over $7 there is a 15% bonus value that is added to the card)?
16 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is stupid. Everyone benefits from MUNI. The more people who ride MUNI, the more parking spaces are available, the less traffic and accidents, better environment. There are so many other straightforward ways to balance the budget that don't cut public services. Public services such as MUNI are a good long term investment in the community. If we want a better budget, maybe we should stop complicating it and abusing it with policies like this... or maybe the government should stop borrowing money through bonds that only make the rich richer in the long run.
13 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes, please penalize those fast pass users who purchase a month's service in ADVANCE, whether the service is used or not, and which likely also offers MUNI much needed cash funds to access. Hello?
14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think Mayor Newsom needs to have a closer look at Muni and not just ride it once every couple months for photo ops. Maybe he'd see that probably half of the people that ride Muni (especially evenings) don't pay at all! Free rides for anyone who either is mentally ill, homeless, drunk or drugged, or menacing enough. Yay! As a paying Monthly Pass user, why should I have to pick up their slack? Especially for a public service where I feel my life is sometimes in danger either from fellow passengers or from the driver him/herself. Maybe we should end the unions that protect these drivers and let them continue to put peoples' lives in danger. Don't punish the people who keep you in business in order to resolve poor financial planning and a system that continues to spiral downwards. Focus on adding value and improvements first, then maybe I'll support your pass increases.
18 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Guess I'll be buying a car then if this fare increase happens. As it is, catching an on-time MUNI bus is a crapshoot, and getting to my destination on time by using MUNI is an uncertainty. Add to that the cost of other bay area transit increasing, and cars start to look more affordable and time saving. I estimate that I waste 10 hours a week by taking public transportation versus driving. That translates into $200 a week, or $800 a month. That's quite a bit more than the upkeep costs of a car. The mayor better think REALLY hard before implementing a fare increase.
14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Le Muniserable said:
A fare increase could help pay the Mayor's staff. Muni is the transportation system San Francisco loves to hate raising the price for a fast pass for those who actually pay for one each month will make it much easier. Ever notice how the fair inspectors corner unsuspecting commuters in the muni train stations on the inbound lines where writing tickets for having no fare receipt, or transfer, or fast pass is about as easy as shooting fish in a barrel? Seeing a fare inspector on the 30 Stockton in Chinatown is almost as rare as sighting Chuck Nevius, columnist for that other paper, actually riding one. If congestion pricing were to be applied to sidewalks Muni's coffers could be filled overnight by charging pedstrians on that transportation corridor, but I doubt it would be nearly enough to pay for the proposed new underground rail lines between the Caltrain Station and Chinatown. Come to think of it, shouldn't congestion pricing apply to the sidewalks covered with sleeping homeless?
15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How about ending the corruption behind the Muni union! How about ending the $60,000 salaries for bus drivers who are chronically late? How about ending bonuses for drivers who show up on time? How about not paying drivers who sit around watching tv in the break room waiting to see if anyone is going to call in sick? Muni sucks!
19 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree