
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The D.C. government faces at least two months of steep interest payments after the rate on $25 million in bonds tied to the construction of Nationals Park rose to a staggeringly high figure.
The interest rates on the so-called “auction-rate securities” held by the District as part of its stadium bond package shifted in mid-March from 4.75 percent to 14 percent, Bloomberg News reported this week.
The nearly 10-point difference will cost the city about $200,000 a month until it finds a way to refinance or convert to another security, Lasana Mack, the District’s treasurer, told The Examiner on Tuesday.
“This crisis has developed over the last couple of months, with these bonds resetting at high rates,” Mack said.
Investors long regarded the long-term securities as “highly liquid,” Mack said, because their variable interest rates reset every time they went to auction — in the District’s case every 35 days. But Wall Street has recently lost confidence in the insurers that back these bonds, spurring failed auctions and soaring interest rates.
The market was blindsided by the collapse in auction-rate securities, which affect about $200 billion in overall debt, said Matt Fabian, managing director with Concord, Mass.-based Municipal Market Advisors. Fabian said he attended a conference in December that featured an address by a D.C. finance official, who at the time confessed to “monitoring the situation.”
“No one in the industry would have advised them to restructure at that point,” Fabian said. “No banker understood the magnitude back then.”
D.C. holds roughly $550 million in general obligation auction-rate debt that it has used to finance the city’s capital improvements program, Mack said. The interest rates on those have reset to levels ranging from 3 percent to 10 percent, but the stadium bonds have a weaker credit rating so their interest rate shot higher.
D.C. is in the process of converting or refunding all of its auction-rate securities “in order to resolve the issue of the abnormally high interest rates,” Mack said. The treasurer expects to get it done by May.
“It’s not like we’ve been just sitting around watching it,” he said.
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:46 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Council considers raising taxes on Nationals tickets"
Report as inappropriate
2:18 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "No easy access near ballpark for disabled"
Report as inappropriate
11:32 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008
re: "Shuttle service, beer sales among issues still to work out before Opening Day"
Report as inappropriate
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
7:06 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
6:23 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
4:10 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
5:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 22, 2007
re: "Deal should clear the way for stadium art"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Not paying the rent? Kick them out! They are a losing team anyway.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Now how did "progressive, caring" DC happen to forget about the Americans with Disabilities Act which requires that public facility projects consider access for the disabled?
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"The most extreme example might be June 29, when United faces off against David Beckham and the L.A. Galaxy as 12:30 p.m., and the Nationals play the Baltimore Orioles an hour later." well that was some brilliant scheduling there....lets stuff 100,000 people into the area over a two hour span
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Considering where the new stadium is, you can bet that the cost of security will skyrocket!!!
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If DC knew that they couldn't afford to pay the police department they shouldn't have never opened up the Stadium. You have so many poor people living in the DC area and all the taxes we citizens have to pay could have been going into better use. we have to pay all this money and we are not going to see where the money is going. Who cares, right.
8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Re:$2M owed for security at Nats games -- Since the "quasi-governmental" D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission won't pay the $2 million it owes the Metropolitan Police Department for security at Nats games, why not get those "quasi" Commission members and paid staff out directing traffic on game days? At $55 an hour, it should only take them 36,364 person-hours to work off their debt.
9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Whether the [commission] is paying it or MPD is paying it, it comes out of the same pot,” Mayor Adrian Fenty’s spokeswoman Carrie Brooks said in a statement. WHAT? Good grief, no wonder the city is in so much trouble. Everyone is aware the budget process means nothing in D.C., and that is why money is misspent and missing everywhere, but to come out an officially admit it, wow - good work Brooks.
8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The city charges baseball $55.00 per hour, the officers are paid their regular hourly rate. For most officers that about $32.00 per hour. What is the city doing with the difference?
8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
miqcie: Art is good. The DC government should make sure that it is part of the environment throughout our city, and encourage the community cultural groups and gifted DC artists who create it. The stadium is private property, owned by the Lerner family, who can well afford to buy their own art.
292 agree | 315 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
miqcie said:
I'm hopeful that this funding will be restored and is appropriate use of financing for public art. As a denizen of this city, I'd don't mind a part of my tax dollars going to projects like this that are truly community goods.
323 agree | 295 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
The Commission claimed the site-specific art for the private baseball stadium was just being "loaned" to the stadium but still owned by the commission. That is like saying your dental work is on loan from someone else. Public art projects like this are normally paid for by the developer, and the public arts agency gives technical assistance in the project's execution. This poor judgment by the Commission has cost the DC arts community $850,000 in much-needed capital funds.
351 agree | 296 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Update: The deal is now for a $206,000+ site-specific sculpture to be "loaned" to the stadium by the DC Arts Commission. That is like saying that you "borrow" your dental work, an obvious falsehood. Shame.
356 agree | 350 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree