Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - We were back in the backroom again last week, standing around watching senators and delegates hash out their differences on the state budget.
At the same conference table on a late Sunday afternoon four months ago, with some of the same senators present, lawmakers added the computer services tax onto the tax increases rammed through the House and Senate early the next morning.
Now, after some fierce re-education by IT professionals contemplating moves out of state to avoid the tax, they fully recognize their mistake.
The negotiators knew they could be back at the table later this week wrangling over the additional budget transfers and reductions in spending growth they would need to repeal the $200 million tax.
Core Responsibilities
The budget is considered the concrete expression of the state’s policy choices.
Yet lost amid the incredible budget detail — close to 2,500 pages in three volumes — is the question: What are the core state responsibilities?
A “thorough and efficient system of free public schools” is the only required state spending mandate, but until five years ago, the bulk of that responsibility fell on the shoulders of the counties.
Roads, prisons and social services also seem to be part of core.
Advocates for state measures in reducing greenhouse gases — through regulation, not direct spending — acknowledge the rules would be unnecessary if the federal government was doing its proper job.
The same exists for health coverage, which is a split funding responsibility with the federal government.
Yet there’s never enough to meet every need, and never enough votes to kill a program once it’s started.
Sen. David Harrington, D-Prince George’s and former chairman of the Prince George’s County Council, wanted to require 150 minutes of physical activity through eighth grade to counteract growing obesity.
The estimated cost is an additional $26 million for the counties.
Due to the price tag, the Senate set up a task force to study the new requirement.
Sen. Catherine Pugh, D-Baltimore City, wanted to boost the age of compulsory school attendance from 16 to 18 years old.
She settled for 17.
The price tag is $50 million; though when teenagers drop out of school after September, their schools don’t have to return the state funding based on the number of pupils.
Funding for stem cell research — which President Bush has refused to provide — certainly seems to fall outside the state’s core responsibilities, but is a popular program nonetheless, in a state where federal dollars for medical research adds tens of thousands of jobs.
Hailing Hopkins
The retiring president of Maryland’s largest private employer, Johns Hopkins University’s William Brody, got a standing ovation in the Senate last Wednesday.
There was mutual stroking on both sides.
Brody praised lawmakers for their support of health care and higher education.
Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, D-Calvert and Prince George’s, thanked Brody for polishing a state jewel that is perhaps the only Maryland institution recognized around the world.
Maryland has funneled $56 million into private colleges and university this year, and Hopkins gets about half of that.
But that pales in comparison to Hopkins’ 41,000 employees and the $1.2 billion in federal research grants the university hauls in, the highest amount of any U.S. university.
This is partly due to the university’s applied physics lab in Howard County, which gets $680 million in grants, mostly for defense and space projects.
Controlling
the comptroller
In addition to the numbers, the state budget bill contains a lot of language directing state agencies to focus on this or report on that.
A minor sticking point between the House and Senate is language that senators tacked saying Comptroller Peter Franchot could only spend the money to fulfill his constitutional duties.
Members of the House Appropriations Committee — on which Franchot had been a subcommittee chairman — removed the language and argued in their meeting with their Senate counterparts that it ought to stay gone.
Miller had complained that Franchot was spending money on staff to promote himself and not on collecting taxes.
“Sometimes we use sign language,” Senate Budget Chairman Ulysses Currie, D-Prince George’s, said cryptically.
Del. Mary-Dulany James, D-Harford and Cecil, called the language “superfluous,” and Del. Charles Barkley, D-Montgomery, wondered how it could possibly be enforced.
“The auditors would have fun with it,” remarked Warren Deschenaux, the legislature’s fiscal chief, referring to the accounting watchdogs who also work for the General Assembly.
Len Lazarick can be reached at llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:09 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 4, 2008 re: "Maryland Democrats’ new math might not add up"
Report as inappropriate
6:56 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
6:43 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008
re: "He who laughs last ..."
Report as inappropriate
9:54 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
9:38 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
9:24 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008
re: "He who laughs last ..."
Report as inappropriate
8:29 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "We are out of here"
Report as inappropriate
8:24 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "We are out of here"
Report as inappropriate
9:09 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 11, 2008
re: "Republicans score a rare victory, but on a minor issue"
Report as inappropriate
3:51 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Republicans score a rare victory, but on a minor issue"
Report as inappropriate
7:25 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
2:54 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
7:26 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
2:54 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
12:08 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
11:50 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
9:31 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
8:23 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Budget crunchers put squeeze on O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
4:56 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008
re: "Six-figure salaries not uncommon for state workers"
Report as inappropriate
4:51 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008
re: "Six-figure salaries not uncommon for state workers"
Report as inappropriate
5:24 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
3:12 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "O’Malley back to basics"
Report as inappropriate
1:41 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "O’Malley back to basics"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "O’Malley back to basics"
Report as inappropriate
8:25 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "O’Malley back to basics"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 31, 2008
re: "Back to basics for crime fighter O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008
re: "Back to basics for crime fighter O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
6:51 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008
re: "Back to basics for crime fighter O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
5:23 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008
re: "Back to basics for crime fighter O’Malley"
Report as inappropriate
2:29 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 13, 2007
re: "From behind closed doors to the backroom"
Report as inappropriate
3:02 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
2:11 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
12:08 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
11:27 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "Plucky O’Malley needs luck of the Irish"
Report as inappropriate
10:47 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
10:40 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
9:46 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
8:57 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
8:47 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
5:20 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
5:17 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 5, 2007
re: "O’Malley optimistic so far"
Report as inappropriate
8:12 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
7:59 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
7:45 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
7:43 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
12:30 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
11:27 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007
re: "Spotlight’s on governor tonight"
Report as inappropriate
taxfree marylander said:
martyland and democrate new math... increased taxes + increased spending = inflated budgets Real math... less taxes + less government spending = financial stability. too bad Marty and his henchmen can't figure this out! It's time for us to deliver a third party that truely understands economics, one that will decrease the size of government, and allow her people to keep more of their money.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why don't Annapolis tax lawyers, because they would never allow themselves to be taxed. There would be so much revenue generated from this group because they feed off the poor. We need to have our own Boston Tea Party very soon, it's in the horizon .. Can't wait
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Md for O'Malley is probaly the same Md for Bush. O'Malley is running scared because he knows his political career is over. Wonder how he's feeling now that WBAL uncovered that the city police did spying on groups while under his watch. lol Hey O'Jerko where were you playing with the band in a pub somewhere. You were suppose to give up the band, You should have done that along time ago. If you were on American Idol they would have left you go along time ago. lol
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
people need to wake up and vote these jerks out. O'Jerko has raised taxes more than anybody. Since when do you cut spending does your budget still goes up. If you cut it means to subtract not add to the budget. I guess this just goes to show that even O'Malley didn't get a good education. Bigger Government means less take home pay. Smaller Government means more money for taxpayers. Democrates means bigger government and more social programs means we the taxpayers lose. We need to get a law on the books like California where we can throw these guys out when they think they can do anything they want. Annapolis is just a polluted septic system that needs a good flushing and a good cleaning out. And the next election we the taxpayers need to get the flusing and cleaning done right this time.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have to laugh and maybe cry at some of the comments here. I have to laugh because what's written here is what I think of these criminals in Annapolis and Washington. But I have to cry because what is written in the comments here are all true. And it ain't getting any better. Tax and spend politicians want more of your money. I don't see any politicians taking salary cuts or cutting their expense accounts. In fact, O'Malley and his gang of thieves taxed you more but also gave hugh raises to government employees. Yes, I have to laugh but I also have to cry especially when I look at my pay check, my real estate tax bill, my BGE bill, my gasoline bill, my grocery bill. I don't have much left after taxes to pay my mortgage payment to the bank. could this be the reason why people are losing their homes? Maybe it's not the lenders, but the taxes one has to pay that has cause many to lose their homes. But O'Malley and Friends, including Peter, and Washington, will not budge.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I like the way Franchot gets under O'Malley's skin at times, but like O'Malley, Franchot is a liberal and will think nothing of raising you taxes for the sake of the liberal agenda. Like O'Malley, Franchot is the type that thinks illegal immigration is good for this state and this country. The liberals argue that the illegals pay taxes. I do agree that they do pay a small portion, but that gain is wiped out with the government freebies there are given including, but not limited, to educating their kids and their health care. Bottom line, Maryland and US taxpayers are paying big bucks for these illegals over and above what benefits are derived from their being here. But the likes of O'Malley, Franchot, and many of the Democrats in Annapolis (and Washington) don't care what the majority of Americans feel about these issues and they will continue to hand out your money like it is candy. They don't care what you think, what you want, and what you pay.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Franchot is still a jerk...... He obviously wants to be Governor and like O'Malley, will lie and cheat his way to the top. Unfortunately, the voters of Maryland are so dumb, they will continue to vote in these liberal nut-cases. Marylanders are paying dearly for their choices in the last election and will continue to pay, and pay, and pay, and pay. Gee, wait until the Democrats control all of Washington; the country will be a type of Maryland (tax and spend and you won't be able to do a thing about it). Pay more get less, all for the sake of spreading the wealth to those who can't get out from in front of their TVs and find a job. Just wait until this country has universal health care, people will be flocking to this country, both legally and illegally. The health systems will be overwhelmed and we American taxpayers will have to go to the end of the line. When is enough is enough . . . is it when over half of what you make goes to government? This is Franchot.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Larry,Pasadena MD said:
3:51 AM - below: Per MD 4 omalley, Have you ever heard of sarcasm?
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
HoCo Guy said:
The learned governor needs to stop running around the state primping for photo ops, and see if he can't stop spending our money on upper class salaries and such. It will certainly be nice to see him leave annapolis permanently in two years.
7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
richard f said:
MD 4 O'Malley is LT. Gov Brown.Who else would think the Gov. is doing a good job.Hey Buster Brown get back in your shoe..............
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
See the post from MD 4 O'Malley 9:31 below. These are the idiots that we have to thank for the corrupt MD government. Dopes.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Brad said:
Governor Martin O'Malley passed the largest tax hike in Maryland history. Martin O'Malley's Administration will cost Maryland families thousands of the dollars over the next few years. Martin O'Malley does NOT care about working families. Governor O'Malley's hand-picked PSC rubber-stamped massive BGE rate hikes. I am done with O'Malley.
13 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
fed up said:
Pure Greed on there part. It will never change. Wake up everybody. Something needs to be done. Don't keep on putting these fools in office.
43 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
P. Ackerman, Columbia said:
I have no problem with everyone paying their fair share of taxes, even the "tech firms". However, there is one group that has managed to escape all the tax increases: Maryland's politicians. Political contributions should be taxed at a rate 1% higher than the existing state income tax rates and purchases made by political campaigns should be charged a sales tax 1% higher than the existing rate. This will allow our politicians the pride of announcing how much each of them contributed to the states treasury during their last campaign. It will also encourage politicians to keep taxes down (Maybe even cut them?), and it will more than offset the $200 million the state will lose when all the "tech firms" move out. Tax the politicians.
49 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader. said:
i got an idea cut there staff and stop with the high priced dinner's,trip's,car's and party's that should save a mill ar two.
26 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Dumbocrats just don't get it!! Sales tax revenue for January is DOWN 5.5%. The fifth largest drop since 1985. If you want to INCREASE sales tax revenue, LOWER the sales tax to 4%. People in the surrounding states, except Delaware, will come to Maryland to shop to save their money. Not a hard concept to understand unless of course you are a Dumbocrat.
33 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Listen to that sucking sound as IT firms leave for Northern Virginia. Listen to that gushing sound as illegal aliens flock into Maryland for licenses and tuition welfare. The Maryland voters are finally reaping the benefits of their vote.
39 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
MD 4 O'Malley said:
Martin O'Malley is doing an excellent job, so please stop all the O'Malley bashing. Why do you all say these mean, terrible things about Marty? He is a good man and a great governor. Look at how he fix the BGE rate increase. And stop all the whinning about some little tax increases. Just suck it up and take it like a man! All this talk about moving out of Maryland is just a bunch of hot air. You're not going anywhere. Marty O'Malley raised taxes because he could, and there's NOTHING you can do about it. Besides, you all will forget about this by 2010 and re-elect Marty for four more years. You know you will. Who are the Republicans going to run in 2010? Erhlich? Hahahahaha!
30 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Does everyone finally see the long term problems creeated by the majority party who stonewalled Ehrlich on slots? Had they not done so, hundreds of millions of dollars per year would have been rolling into the state treasury for the past three years and this problem would not be so grave. WAY TO GO DEMS!
34 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Undertaker said:
With inflation, high oil prices, and high federal, state, and local taxes, you need a six figure salary just to stay ahead.
20 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr Lazarick, Please print these $100,000+ salaried positions - maybe 100 a day - I'm sure I'm not the only reader that wants to know! Thanks from a MD State employee that doesn't make $100,000.
28 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So maybe the teflon lepreCON is going to roll up his sleeves and get our BGE bills lowered............ I don't know about you all but I am not holding my breath.
42 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The idiot would not have won the election if it wasn't for baltiomre, they wanted to get rid of him so they all voted him out of the city. Ho'Malley is as crooked as the eletric company, lets tell people what they want to hear than do the opposite of what he pledged to do. Hey blockhead Governor My Electric bill for my townhouse raised by $300.00 in the past 3 months and my wife and I work and no one is home all day and we turned the heat down to 65deg. So how does it go up? Bring Ehrlich back now! IMPEACH HO"MALLEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
58 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark said:
He's an arrogant crooked scumbag but the idiot voters in this state decided they preferred him to a real Governor, Bob Ehrlich. This is just a stepping stone to national office for Marty-boy. He ruined Baltimore City, he's in the process of ruining Maryland (further). In the Democrat playbook that qualifies him for national office. He makes me retch. Pompous toad.
63 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
avid reader said:
Nothing funny about a bunch of jerks like we have in Annapolis who do the wrong things everyday under the leadership of the worst Governor in the history of this country.
64 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
The teflon lepreCON theif.
63 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
justdafacts said:
"What about state government? The final fiscal 2001 budget was $20.065 billion; the fiscal 2007 budget was $28.756. Adjusting year 2000 dollars for inflation, using two different inflation calculators, total state spending went up about $5.262 billion, or 26 percent." Len, you answered your own question when you paraprashed Gov. O'Malley in the paragraph above. A gallon a gas went up 100% and healthcare went up 78% in the same period. Gas and healthcare are major state expenses, plus the Thornton spending on education, which resulted in our recent ranking 3rd best in the nation by Education Week.
45 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the mayor and i are going to fight crime.the mayor and i are going to fight crime.the mayor and i are going to fight crime....DO ANY ONE BELIVE US.NO OK. the mayor and i are going to fight crime.
64 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Execution: the only 100% guaranteed way to ensure that criminals don't enjoy a long "career".
63 agree | 53 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Until the judiciary cease suspending a good portion of the sentencings that they dole out and the parole board cease having a revolving door system, the criminals are going to continue to thumb their noses at everyone. In other words, unless the judiciary and the parole board get THEIR agenda in order, crime will just continue AND increase.
63 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Surely this is all upside-down. Budgeting is about living within income, not determining what income you need, and then find a way of getting it. Until such time as te governmental waste has been resolved (and there is plenty of it!) there should be no raising of ANY taxes. It is time for the State to bite the bullet, and dispense with the many, many civil servants that don't even understand the systems the are working with, demand a level of education before employment, and give rises to those within government that ARE effective.
101 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
She also won't rush to deal with homicide rate" That is because she is too busy banging Ed Norris, haven't you heard. Being around certain people allows for privy of certain info, and yes MOM has had more then a few affairs. Did you really think that I would waste my years of good principle on that?? Oh ye of little faith, and yea I am the sucker! But I know where my future is headed do you??? Obviously not, when you take evil over good, blinded faith is what you have and serve!!! At least I can say I did what I truly believed to be the right thing to do in God's eyes, how about you with your white trailer trash!!!!
99 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Don said:
What a sad STATE of affairs....and he has had a few.
89 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wish people would stop speaking for "the people of Maryland". We didn't all vote for him...and I don't live in Montgomery County...Maryland goes beyond that. Thanks.
97 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
O'Malley makes me sick. I didn't vote for him.
128 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Omalley has worked so hard as our governor. He did such a good job with Baltimore that he deserves to take my money without trying to stop wasting so much. He had to spend all of the rainy day money so it would be make the deficit look worse. Then it would be easier for him to rape all the people of Maryland not just the rich like they mislead.
73 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joseph said:
Maryland needs a recall law so we can get rid of this donkey!!!!!!!!!!!!! The election was fixed anyway. Maryland wiil look like Baltimore in eight years if we don't stop this crap the O'Gov is pulling!
107 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
where did you put the $670,000,000 surplus marty? and why did you people in maryland not like bob erlich again?
114 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
City Resident said:
last time i checked there were 49 other states in this country you grumpy people could move to! You don't like it in Maryland? Go! and don't let the door hit ya...
94 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Taxes need to go up to pay for diversity which is just a fancy word for I came here from someplace else and I want all the freebies I can get my hands on.
117 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
More like Welcome to O'Malleyland. Give me your wallet. The guy is a jerk and unfortunately we have 3 more years of him raping us.
98 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I do not understand why everybody is up in arms about the governor's higher tax plan. This is why the people of Maryland voted as they did. This is what the people of Maryland wanted. A progressive state which contains a progressive county like Montgomery County welcomes such actions with open arms.
110 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
VJC College Republican said:
Not only is he optimistic, he is exuberated that he is going to pass a historical tax increase on ALL of Marylanders. He may as well just slip in the Addendum in one of these bills that Maryland is now called O'Malleyland.
95 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree time to "tweak" this tax and spend Democrat back to Canada....or Baltimore city....or PG county, all are about the same when it comes to clear thinking!
92 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope that the sun doesn't go down in O'Malleyland and anger still exists. At least I know what I need to do to make Maryland and myself a better person, that is more then I can say for O'Malley. I venture to say that his pride has overtaken him, how distasteful and a disgrace to the citizens of our great state. Hang in there people and keep the faith, we will get through this and come out on the other side triumphantly as we all fight the good fight of faith together.
91 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
11:11 "Anger has also been referred to as a defense mechanism - to shield from the emotion behind it. It has to do with a feeling of helplessness. When first I came here bleary eyed, My confusion and fears I could not hide. A group of strangers surrounding me, And not all friendly as I could see. But one man there stood by my side. GOD" Hebrews 11:6 "But without faith it is impossible to please him, for he that cometh to God must believe that he is and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." Come to God with the right attitude and motives, meaning believe that God is and that he is a rewarder of those that diligently seek him. If one believes firmly in the existence of God but doubts his word he makes him a liar. Seek diligently and seek after God; this is the secret of pleasing God and the absolute necessity of faith.
92 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?
86 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Casual observer said:
Think he'll be sober? BTW, O'Malley is the teflon leprechaun. Think about it: Ehrlich left the state with a huge surplus and gets voted out. Think people will vote for O'Malley again? Sure. This won't stick. People in this state are dumb enough to gas up the car + 12 cents per gallon and drive to the polls, pay parking +6% sales tax, and vote for this idiot again.
95 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
He works me hard to make me strong, And tells me what I'm doing wrong. He sees that I am never poor. Could a vassal want anything more? For M'Lord, I wrote this song.
86 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
5:32 "Like love is blind and sees only what is within and not the external......3)Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes. 4) Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight. 1 Peter 3:3&4, King James Version. So it is with man, love serves as a buffer to human flaws, shortcomings, and or desired expectations of another. When you love someone, you do not notice their stature, weight, or body features, only their warm, caring touch, the way they laugh, and the sound of their voice; all which can portray the internal self. Love allows the internal person to be seen as the surface of a person.
83 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree