
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - New restaurants might be allowed to open later this year in the Haight-Ashbury, after planning commissioners for the third time in eight months agreed to tweak a San Francisco neighborhood’s decades-old restaurant moratorium. The Planning Commission voted unanimously and without debate last week to allow as many as four new alcohol-serving restaurants to open along a six-block strip of Haight Street east of Golden Gate Park or in nearby streets. The change was proposed by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, whose district includes the neighborhood, and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. The proposed change was supported by department staff.
“Eating and drinking habits have changed over the past 20 years,” Planning Department legislative analyst Tara Sullivan-Lenane wrote in a memo to commissioners.
Off-sale liquor licenses will continue to be prohibited and new restaurant permit applications will be considered on a “first-come, first-served basis,” according to Sullivan-Lenane.
Dean Macris, a former planning director who works on special department projects, told The Examiner that in the 1980s there was a “strong, strong concern about two or three kinds of uses” that were taking up swathes of retail space in the Haight Street district. Like most of The City’s 18 Neighborhood Commercial Districts, which regulate housing developments and new businesses, the district was created in 1987, records show.
At the time the limitations were introduced, bars, restaurants and bank branches were seen to be overtaking The City and displacing neighborhood-serving businesses like cobblers, dry cleaners and hardware stores, Macris said.
“I think there’s a growing interest that those limitations should be re-examined,” Macris said. “It needs to be looked at again.” San Francisco residents are more “receptive” to new restaurants in their neighborhoods than they were in the 1980s, Macris said.
New bank branches create fewer concerns than they did 20 years ago because of the growth of ATMs, he said.
New bars, however, are often opposed during Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission last week rejected an application to open a new wine bar in club-filled North Beach, where Supervisor Aaron Peskin has proposed new liquor controls.
Kevin Westlye, executive director of the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, said recent decisions by the Planning Commission to relax restaurant moratoriums have helped neighborhoods replace eateries that were shut down.
“It’s encouraging that restaurants want to continue to go into neighborhoods,” Westlye said, “where they’re working with residents as their customer base.”

Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
12:15 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 17, 2008 re: "New eateries may bud in Haight-Ashbury"
Report as inappropriate
7:27 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 5, 2007
re: "Chef Paolino’s dishes pasta with pizazz"
Report as inappropriate
8:42 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Chef Paolino’s dishes pasta with pizazz"
Report as inappropriate
12:51 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 25, 2007
re: "Powell brings Jamaican spice to Penn Quarter restaurant"
Report as inappropriate
5:39 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 4, 2007
re: "Beer soup brightens meal in Ellicott City"
Report as inappropriate
Gaza George said:
Let them eat and drink. Too many hemp products can be harmful to the multinational restaurant bottom line. Go liquor holes.
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I was very surprised by the comment. When we go to eat at Chef Paolino, I always take the kids to a table first and either my husband or I order for all of us. Our first time there, we all took a menu to a table and then my husband went up and ordered for the family. I think the writer just misunderstood.
255 agree | 231 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
On the evening of 09/07/07 my family and I went to eat at this restaurant for dinner at 5:30 pm. Being our first time there I questioned if they would seat us or should we seat ourselves. The employee advised me we had to go order our food then we could seat ourselves. I ask him if I could please sit first. In my arms was my handicapped 5 year old daughter who from Spinal Bifida can not walk, my husband was carrying our 3 month old son and I had 3 other children with me ranging from 7 to 9. I explained to him I could not continue to hold her and go order my food due to her wait. It would be impossible to hold her and order, pay, ect. Even after explaining why I needed to be seated first he refused to do so. My family and I had to leave that establishment and to say the least was very dissatisfied with our first experience at the Chef Paolino Cafe.I believe this restaurant needs to change there process of ordering and seating customers. This process is very difficult for the handicapped
430 agree | 254 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Anon said:
Chef Alex Powell's enthusiasm for his work and his creations comes across well in this article. As a food connoisseur and a lover of island flavors, it will be my priority to visit the 701 Restaurant. The chef takes me back to my own roots where the belief is that you can never go wrong with simple, natural ingredients. Way to go chef and welcome to DC!
322 agree | 270 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sounds like a typical visit to most restaruants these days. Steak are always "iffy" I try to avoind them because a chef will tell you fat on a steak helps retain juices, but I don't like fat. Also, if I see a sauce on anything I avoid it. especailly at a place where I have never eaten. I had a friend that was a professional chef. I was grilling steaks at my house one day and asked him to show me how he made his steak taste so good. He rubbed both sides with salt.
629 agree | 288 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree