CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
Multimedia News
D.C. United, city still talking lease deal for 2008
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
“Our hope is to get something finalized before the first game,” said Gregory O’Dell, D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission chief executive officer. “We recognize they are the primary tenant and we want to treat them accordingly.”
The team is scheduled to host the Harbour View Football Club on Tuesday.
United President Kevin Payne said Wednesday that he is “quite confident the agreement we arrive at will be inclusive of every game this year.” But even if a new deal isn’t reached by next week, he said, the team will continue playing at RFK on a month-to-month basis.
The relationship between United and the District has strained in recent months, which may have slowed talks. Team owner Victor MacFarlane is angling for a new stadium in Southeast, an idea not yet embraced by Mayor Adrian Fenty.
“We have to make a decision based on what’s best for the business of D.C. United, and that involves looking at how long it takes to get into a stadium, and what our economic terms are in the interim,” Payne said.
The commission has asked that United pay up to $200,000 more this year to cover the costs of grounds equipment and waste removal, while the two would share advertising and sponsorship revenues that were previously controlled by the Washington Nationals. The team, meanwhile, has offered to pay a monthly lump sum that would cover the city’s expenses and expected revenues.
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:00 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Many cops on brutality watch list work in most violent D.C. districts"
Report as inappropriate
8:41 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008
re: "Many cops on brutality watch list work in most violent D.C. districts"
Report as inappropriate
11:04 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Economists blast plans for public subsidy to help fund new D.C. United stadium"
Report as inappropriate
9:57 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008
re: "Economists blast plans for public subsidy to help fund new D.C. United stadium"
Report as inappropriate
9:17 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008
re: "Bordering on new territory"
Report as inappropriate
6:31 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "Immigration refined"
Report as inappropriate
6:58 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "United deep in the heart of Texas"
Report as inappropriate
12:43 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"
Report as inappropriate
11:46 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"
Report as inappropriate
10:15 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "United gets the ultimate Valentine’s gift"
Report as inappropriate
9:27 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"
Report as inappropriate
10:52 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "United considers stadium site outside D.C."
Report as inappropriate
10:35 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "United considers stadium site outside D.C."
Report as inappropriate
6:26 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 11, 2007
re: "United considering stadium site outside D.C."
Report as inappropriate
5:28 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007
re: "Red Bulls resurgence not a Cosmos revival"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Thank You for explaining how that PPMS system works. The Examiner failed to explain the system. I have some good cops in my neighborhood who are afriad to say anything to the drug dealers on my corner because they can not afford any more complaints. One MPD captain told me that their system of reporting police complaints is flawed with problems. The cops that I mentioned already been hire by another police department, when I mentioned it to the same captain because they left, he said yea they are all leaving, like it was nothing.
10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Today I'm disappointed with the Examiners reporting. This is very lazy reporting, the writer fails to explain how the system really works, I blame the editors for this. The system you are reporting on cannot be explained in a paragraph. The system is called Personnel Performance Management System (PPMS) it automatically assign a pre-disposition point value to all complaints against officers & some job related activity including (missing court 10 pts, use of force hand strike 25 pts, vehicle pursuit 25 pts, civil law suit filed against an officer 25 pts, and tardiness 15 pts). 100 points trigger the automatic review that is being discussed in the article. In most cases that officer is forced to participate in some type of re-training/corrective action before these allegations are investigated and a determination made that the alleged misconduct acutally happened. This system protects the officers who do nothing and punish the workers. As constituted the system discourages work.
12 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
TTT said:
As a fan I am sick of DC Govt and other anti United and its stadium plans. Although I wish there is a way to remain the team in the District, but with their devil spirit, I urge the team to move out of this place. Let hem sit on the empty rotten feild and be miserable forever.
15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
RSS said:
It is amazing that such irresponsible journalism is tolerated and that reports by agenda-driven groups are presented as fact and without critical analysis or contrary opinions solicited. For starters, any analysis that is worth presenting is based on facts which are utterly lacking and wrong in this case. This facility will be used many more times than the "fewer than 30" used in the analysis. In fact, the number is likely to be more than double the figure provided in the "analysis". So-called analysis that is based on assumptions that are demonstrably off by a factor of nearly 2 is irresponsible. Reporting irresponsible data without analysis is irresponsible reporting. This could have been determined by cursory evaluation of any number of readily-available sources. If the lack of real journalism in this article is representative of the quality of the Examiner, you are in a sorry state, indeed.
20 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
dee said:
TFC is a much better team then D.C united. The only player D.C has that is close to real football material is Emilio. He has had flashes of world class striking, but with D.C shallow depth, he is not receiving the proper service. If D.C has any hopes for this season, they need to keep Moreno on the bench, and play the young guns like Quaranta and Emilio. And focus around Gallardo because he is the root of most of D.C`s goals. Regardless, D.C, can not compare to a revamped Toronto FC. Toronto outskills them by a long shot. But D.C can still hope.
18 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Cohen said:
The South Americans are bringing class to the league. I can't wait for the new season to start this Saturday!
19 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Nancy McBeth said:
The city this contest takes place in is named Cibolo not Cebolo. Please correct. Thank you.
19 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Absolutely, totally, completely and inexcusably obscene. Especially in the current economic climate, no municipality, or state for that matter, should be spending public money on sports stadiums owned by people who can afford to build their own facilities. Fix the schools, roads, bridges, hospitals, etc., first.
79 agree | 86 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bob in Manassas said:
"If DC United wanted a soccer stadium, it should have done what business people do: ask for a loan from private industry to be repaid with interest." D.C. United did come with a plan and even did the leg work to get the Polar Point land. The catch was the infrastructure support (about $200 mil) for mixed use development similar to what Clark has proposed ... except the Clark project will need $500 million kicked in from the city. I do not know about your math mine says that Fenty is a dope.
83 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To be honest, the Nats and United belonged in VA. They are the real ones that are floating both teams. Just being honest!
81 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am glad to see that the Mayor is doing the right thing after screwing United and the groups that did all the work in promoting ACTUAL development in Anacostia. Hell, United won the support of Marion Barry … I do not see how this is a better deal for the city. The city will be putting up twice as much money as McFarlane / AEG initially requested for the Poplar Point site improvements. Not only is the city is to pay more for site improvements but will also plus kick in money for the stadium; sounds like the over pay approach that the city specializes in. Way to go Mayor Fenty ...
78 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fairfax United? Gimme a break. They're not going anywhere. They're trying to force the issue. What sucks for DC United is that soccer isn't baseball, I'd love if they stayed in DC but nobody is going to the mat to give them a sweetheart deal like the Nats got.
257 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes let's have DC United in Northern Virginia where they will be treated better.
249 agree | 242 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Developersagent.com said:
Its about time someone took a stand in support of Poplar Point & the DC United Stadium besides Marion Barry (whose track record is not the cleanest to say the least). Poplar Point should go to DC United.
412 agree | 277 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Red Bull NY is not tied for MLS's best record, they in fact top the table with 10 points and a plus 5 goal differential, as oppossed to Chicago Fire FC, who sit second with 10 points and a +3 GD.
754 agree | 400 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree