Review: Don’t go back to ‘10,000 B.C’
Article History
There are updates to this article.
D’Leh (Steven Strait) engages in battle in “10,000 B.C.”
(Courtesy photo)
D’Leh (Steven Strait) engages in battle in “10,000 B.C.”

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - How does one begin to describe “10,000 B.C.”?

It is a mess, a highlight reel of lavish effects in search of a story, and laughable in its attempts to be anything more. It makes the most of its impressively daunting saber-toothed tigers and lumbering woolly mammoths with glittering tusks, but when the time comes to focus on the human elements of Roland Emmerich and Harald Kloser’s pedestrian narrative, the movie is hopelessly inept.

Inspired, one suspects, by Mel Gibson’s “Apocalypto,” “10,000 B.C.” recounts the complicated ballad of D’Leh (Steven Strait) and Evolet (Camilla Belle), a handsome pair of prehistoric lovers bound to one another by a passion that is alluded to but never adequately explained.

D’Leh is a hunter, tormented by the knowledge that his father abandoned the family’s small tribe, presumably due to cowardice. Evolet is his fair, blue-eyed maiden, kidnapped by roving warlords and branded a witch. D’Leh vows to save her, and an epic pursuit begins.

D’Leh’s journey is a sweeping rite of passage, an odyssey littered with savage, ostrich-like beasts against a landscape of harsh, snow-swept mountains.

Ultimately, our man in prehistory proves his mettle by laying waste to the heathen slave traders who have captured his true love.

The finale is a foregone conclusion, framed with heavy-handed self-importance by Kloser’s thunderous score and Omar Sharif’s ponderous narration.

Though “10,000 B.C.” is considerably less violent than Gibson’s tribute to primal fury, it is no less bombastic.

Emmerich, who also directed “Independence Day” and “The Day After Tomorrow,” is no stranger to shallow flights of escapism, but “10,000 B.C.” is a particularly dubious achievement in spite of its expensive-looking visuals.

It is an exercise in empty-headed mythmaking, divorced from both reality and any semblance of cohesive storytelling.

CREDITS

10,000 B.C.

Starring: Steven Strait, Camilla Belle, Cliff Curtis, Joel Virgel,

Affif Ben Badra

Written by Roland Emmerich, Harald Kloser

Directed by Roland Emmerich

Rated PG-13

Running time: 1 hour, 49 minutes


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:41 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008 re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"

Examiner Reader said:
I liked the movie Mama Mia. I saw it with my daughter and thougt it was refreshing... so what that some didn't have thesinging voice but the laughter was always there. I recommend this movie to anyone who just wants to laugh and leave life for a short time. I am not one for musicals and was not happy that my daughter picked this but I was so glad she did!! FUN FUN FUN!!!!

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:55 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

Examiner Reader said:
"Why, after an hour of pratfalls, try to reinvent Hancock as a somber second coming of the Caped Crusader? I like the idea of a disgraced superhero struggling to rehabilitate his image." This specific comment leads me to believe that you missed the point, and that you would rather drop a clever phrase in your own creation, your critique, than do your job as a critic and evaluate fully what was given to you (instead of "what if?") By the way, "Caped Crusader" is a name most often attributed to Bruce Wayne's alter ego, not the "aww, gee" squeaky clean Superman (which I believe is what you inferred). The ending, which focused on the familiar comic themes, of self sacrifice and the powers of the ordinary were very satisfying for this comic fan. The questions left unanswered in the movie are what number one issues are made of. I have a complaint: more of the title's credit should have been given to Bateman and Theron in my opinion. Hancock, albeit misnamed, was a great introduction.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:23 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Review: A profile of a ‘Gonzo’ guy"

Gone. So? said:
So many seemingly brilliant alcoholic/addicts whose works became extremely popular through the mass media during the latter half of the twentieth century have had such an endelible influence on American culture that by now you'd expect one of them to perhaps become President of the United States. Oh yeah, right, one already has.

10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

MrHyphy said:
Hancock is a good movie end of story.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:59 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
just came back from seeing a movie that i thought would be great but it WAS SOME GARBAGE DON'T WAIST UR TIME OR MONEY VIA MOVIE THEATRE OR DVD

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
M. Knight is the modern day equivalent to Alfred Hithcock. I completely disagree with this review and her review of his last two movies. The Village was one his best movies, and The Lady in the Water was also a great movie. Some people just don't have minds capable of seeing outside the box and wondering what if. Case in point, Sally Kline.

11 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
The movie kicked ass!

11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
You, sir, are an idiot of the highest order.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
This was a great movie with a great story line. But hey what would you expect from a critic.

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "Review: The girls are back in town"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms. Katz, You are quite the bitch for revealing that "Big stands Carrie up at the = alter"! Gwen Evans

15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Review: Goin’ back to ‘Indiana’"

Examiner Reader said:
wow the review of the new Indiana Jones movie really over rates it--unlike the others it is ALL style and no substance. the movie has a return of karen allen but then does nothing with her; and what is this===Happy Days meets the X Files? it maybe but isnt an Indiana Jones movie.

16 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
Cont...With regards to Battle for Haditha (see below): This 'rampage' point of view has been disproven. (3) There is evidence that these Marines were used as scapegoats to appease a liberal media and Anti-War sentiments in the Senate and govt like Murtha. There is evidence of undue command influence in the hubris investigation that ensued. The investigation was unprecedented. These Marines were asked to make split moment decisions under duress that most of us would be hard pressed to do differently under similar circumstances. Interesting fact from the think tank AEI: A poll of tribal leaders across Iraq was recently conducted about US elections and who they would vote for, McCain, Obama, or Clinton. A majority would vote for John McCain but in Al Anbar where Haditha occurred, the tribal leaders want to re-elect George Bush. The Iraqi leaders greatly fear us leaving b/c that would ensure the return of the henchmen who murdered and terrorized the locals. They want peace and stabilit

11 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
With regards to Battle for Haditha: To imply this movie is an accurate representation of the Haditha incident is misguided and disingenuous. This movie is far from an accurate representation of what occurred but conjecture based on misinformation. The truth of what occurred and mistakes made are coming out now. So how did the director possibly know what really happened when he made this movie? These are what we do know now: (1) The incident was a set up from insurgents who were looking to create an Iraq massacre for political gain and as part of their information operations. Al Qaeda filmed the carnage and the American and world media appeased them. (2) There is evidence from drones that there were insurgents fleeing from the buildings the Marines cleared. The Marines who cleared the buildings were not targeting civilians and were following orders. Their intentions were to ensure their own safety and not from a desire to take revenge or go on some kind of rampage. This 'rampage' poin

14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "No need for hollow, horribly acted ‘Speed’"

Examiner Reader said:
I have heard a lot of trash about this movie, but I have to disagree. I loved it. The part most people miss is that it stays true to the cartoon that inspired it. Sure, it is hokie, far-fetched and dated, but that's just the way the cartoon was! Besides, this show has a lot of action and happy ending. Who wouldn't like that?

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Review: Terrorism enters stoned age"

Examiner Reader said:
Pretty spot-on review, but critics (even Asian Ameircan critics, who are falling over themselves to celebrate the fact that Asians are starring in a mainstream hit movie without being, well, you know, ASIAN) including Examiner's are missing he huge red flag od sexism that permrates both ,ovies but this one even more so. Yeah, so that's part and parcel of the juvenile, hormone-drenched guy genre, but it doesn't excuse the over-the-top nature of this movie's juvenalia. It almsot negates both the empowring of Asian Americans AND the bits of smart political commentary casually tossed off throughout the dialogue. And BTW, Rossiter, there are no hyphens in "Indian American" and "Korean American."

13 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Nights’ can leave you feeling blue"

Melisa said:
The movie was alright - I enjoyed all the cinematic imagery, but I esp. loved the music in the film. I just bought the soundtrack and I can't stop listening to it - really great!

26 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Review: Caught in the net of 'Spiderwick’"

Examiner Reader said:
I read the books and I am an adult female that enjoys a good fantasy book without romance in it. Yes, the books are a bit different, but the story line moved quite well even though it was much different from the books. Well done. My whole family watched it and it was entertaining to us.

109 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:38 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Review: ‘Lions for Lambs’ more like medicine than a movie"

mandela said:
"Lions for lambs" is a colossal bore.

242 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
Pirates of the Caribbean(all 3)have to be the best movies i have ever seen. This is an extremely harsh review of a completely AWEsome movie! I mean come on there had to be something this reviewer liked about it.

289 agree | 280 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:30 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 2, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
RE: POTC3 - I found it to be highly entertaining-which is what a movie is supposed to be! Hey, some liked it, some didn't - so what? Johnny Depp made all 3 movies fun to watch (he IS very easy on the eyes)! A lot of people loved it - hence its popularity. Fantasy pictures are fun - much needed in today's world. There are many "serious" movies with plots so convoluted a person would leave the theater confused. With POTC a person could leave the theater laughing (hang the plots) and wanting more. I think sometimes even critics don't know what they want in a movie. But, you can bet your bottom dollar that if there's a POTC4 it'll be a hit - again, hang the "plots", bring on the characters and the FUN! And if the first 3 didn't float your boat then stay home!

318 agree | 312 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:18 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007 re: "Unbalanced, powerful ‘Sicko’ a movie that matters"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree with Sally Kline's assessment of Michael Moore's documentary... the film left me thoroughly disgusted with the American healthcare system and disenchanted with the ways my fellow citizens and our policy makers are influenced by the almighty dollar. It's sad and pathetic, and no solution seems in sight...

573 agree | 384 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Jackie said:
I love4 you Johnny and please make more films with you as the pirate I think you are the greattest

590 agree | 364 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 1.06 seconds)