Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The judge also ordered the U.S. attorney to amend its indictment against Bonds so that it does not include multiple alleged offenses in a single charge.
Bonds’ attorneys declared the decision a “very good thing” saying it brings transparency and clarity to the case.
Federal prosecutors have accused the most prolific home run hitter in baseball history of lying during his December 2003 testimony to a grand jury investigating steroid use. Bonds testified after federal agents raided Burlingame-based Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, which was owned by Victor Conte and whom pleaded guilty to a steroid distribution charge and money laundering.
Bonds was indicted in November by a separate grand jury on four counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice pertaining to the testimony.
The indictment alleged the slugger lied 19 times during his grand jury testimony when he denied ever knowingly taking steroids or performance-enhancing drugs.
During Friday’s proceedings, Judge Susan Illston unsealed Bonds’ testimony, agreeing with Bonds’ attorney Dennis Riordan that prosecutors must edit out many of the alleged lies or seek a new indictment, which could contain more charges.
Riordan said Friday the indictment was “duplicitous” because it alleged multiple false statements in each of the four perjury counts.
“A jury could find that one offense [in a count] is true and another not true [in the same count],” Riordan said, adding that the obstruction of justice charge should be dismissed as well since it was based upon the four counts of lying under oath.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Wilson said the federal government intended during trial to introduce evidence that would prove all statements in each count false. “The thrust of the government’s indictment is to make a good-faith effort to include false statements in each count,” Wilson said.
But Illston sided with the defense, saying the government needed to “clarify what to proceed on.”
“The government has been told they cannot proceed on this indictment,” Riordan said after the hearing, noting that federal attorneys could come back with even more counts against Bonds. “At this very moment, there is not a valid indictment on Mr. Bonds.”
The November indictment came just three months after the Giants’ left fielder broke Hank Aaron’s career home run record, and it culminated a four-year investigation into steroid use by elite athletes.
The case will return to court March 21 for a status conference to discuss the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s revised indictment of Bonds.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Comments from Examiner Readers
6:26 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
8:24 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
11:50 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
10:55 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
10:22 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
12:57 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 2, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
6:14 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
6:49 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Bonds courtroom circus about to begin"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The so called fan seems to be doing to Barry exactly what they accuse him of having done. Tell the media to take a hike. And if your favorite player did that you'd be on the side of the media, right? I don't think so.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Discerner said:
Does the chickens coming home to roost saying seem right for the "king" The way he has treated people in the past is coming back to haunt him.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Personally, on an emotional level, I would love to see Bonds go to the Yankees this year. I am a big Red Sox fan and seeing Bonds in pin stripes would be a perfect fit, in my eyes. Then my opinion of the Yankees would be complete!
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Oh, those sanctimonious fans who condemn Barry Bonds for alleged use of performance-enhacing drugs.Yup, They're the same ones who blame Eve for Man's downfaul, the same choir that sucks-up a Martini during lunch to drown out their disillusionment with their job, and the same adulters/adultresses who satiate themselves outside the trust of matrimony. What's the famous passage? Let he who has not sinned cast.... It was their hypocritical voice that force Giants' managment to exercise the stupidest decision in baseball - release Bonds. It was exciting with Bond on the team. He changed the dynamics of the game. Pitchers feared him. He put meat on the seats. Alas, it was the reason, whether to cheer or boo, to take in a game. What are Giants without Bonds? Lifeless. Boring - cameras spend more time on coaches and the bullpen than on the field. A team will pick-up Bonds, and his performance with the new team will put the Giants management to shame. Genius has to be tolerated.
8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wasn't Dickey the guy who said Mike Montgomery would never sign with Cal? I suspect that no team, especially the Yankees, would soil themselves with Bonds' baggage. Some say he wore out last year because he had to play the outfield. Others say he's simply gotten old. I doubt, given that he's now a year older and has been away from competitive pitching, that he'll be horrible effective come the dog days of summer.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For the Examiner Reader who says, "Barry is a hero", well, if he was a hero, then he would not cheated himself to become one. He was already on a verge of success, and now this has tarnished his reputation. Barry is not a hero not like Babe Ruth, "Jolting Joe" Dimaggio, Roger Maris, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson and Hank Aaron, to name a few. Jackie Robinson is a true hero because he had to go through diversity to get to a game that would not allow blacks to play. He got a chance. Barry on the other hand got his chance but what has he taught the future generation of baseball fans? Do future generations think that cheating is a way to become a hero?
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, seriously, who friggin cares?
29 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
Barry Bonds reminds me of, sorta like Hank Aaron on steroids.
28 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why are they wasting so much govt. time and our tax-$$$ on this nonsense? Oh, that's right, Barry is the HOME-RUN KING and the single season HOME RUN KING! America always likes to try and destroy our heroes. They won't get away with it this time! Fight Barry, FIGHT BACK!
42 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
It still surprises me that Barry Bonds was indicted. I thought for sure he was gonna walk.
41 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree