
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
SAN FRANCISCO
(Map, News)
-
To determine whether the radioactive landfill at the former Hunters Point Shipyard will be replaced or paved over before it is given to San Francisco, the Navy has bored wells into the most contaminated parts to test groundwater pollution. The 503-acre decommissioned Navy site in The City’s southeast area is slated to be developed by homebuilding giant Lennar Corp. The former shipyard is divided into land parcels and Parcel E-2, located at the southeast corner of the site, is the most contaminated parcel, according to Saul Bloom of Arc Ecology, which was contracted by The City to research and share environmental information about the Superfund site. Parcel E-2 was used in the 1950s and 1960s by the U.S. Navy as a dumping ground for radioactive waste, construction debris, paints, solvents, woodchips and other materials, according to Bloom. A “landfill cap” was placed over 13 acres of Parcel E-2 in 2001 to help extinguish an underground fire that burned for six months and released toxic gases, according to information published by Arc Ecology. Caps, which are less expensive than other methods of treating polluted land, can be cracked by earthquakes, by the natural heating and cooling of the earth, and by burrowing animals, according to Bloom. The Navy is considering capping Parcel E-2 before it’s sold to The City, according to Navy Base Closure Manager Doug Gilkey. He said caps typically consist of soil, although gravel and asphalt can also be used. The parcel might instead need to be excavated, Gilkey said. Navy Remedial Project Manager Mark Walden said pollution could also be treated by injecting material into the groundwater. Such material fosters the growth of microbes that break down pollution, he said. Groundwater tests scheduled next week will provide data to help the Navy and city decide which type of treatment is needed for Parcel E-2. Test results will be included in a draft Parcel E-2 study due out in August, according to Gilkey. Lennar spokesman Sam Singer said parkland is expected to eventually be built over Parcel E-2, and a roadway will run above the parcel or next to it. Lennar has started to develop Parcel A, a 75-acre piece of land transferred from the Navy to The City in 2004 after environmental remediation work was completed. The first Parcel A homes are expected to be built by 2010, according to Singer. Another parcel has been proposed for a potential stadium for the San Francisco 49ers. Parcel E-2 groundwater tests will be discussed at a public meeting scheduled for 6 p.m. today at the Southeast Community Facility, located at 1800 Oakdale Ave.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:15 AM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008 re: "Navy tests pollution at Hunters Point site"
Report as inappropriate
10:21 PM MST on Sun., May. 25, 2008
re: "Developer is the main financier for Hunters Point proposition"
Report as inappropriate
1:31 PM MST on Fri., May. 23, 2008
re: "Navy tests pollution at Hunters Point site"
Report as inappropriate
9:44 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 26, 2008
re: "Plan beckons big-name acts"
Report as inappropriate
10:14 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Navy tests pollution at Hunters Point site"
Report as inappropriate
11:30 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Navy tests pollution at Hunters Point site"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
They should bring in developers who have done jobs in the bay area, like Lennar and KB Homes and the developer, who build that condo apartment arcoss from Tanforan mall. Both Lennar and KB Homes have developed very nice new homes in Danville and other parts of the Bay area like San Jose and Milptias. They should get first dips at the bit for the job. They know how to relly add some nice decor to what they build, like the Americanize Mediterranean & Tuscan look that are popular these days. If they want chain stores or stores and resturants there, they should look to the comapny that did the redevelopment of Tanforan, or the company that build the Great Mall. Those companies also know who call for good lanscaping. If the people at City Hall want people from other part of the city to go therer like from the Sunset area, or even other counties like South San Francisco, Daly City and Milbrae, then that is what they got to do. If not then it is just the Hunter Point people and that is it.
4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Aaron Goodman said:
More money poured in to a development project, that is not open to better solutions. Where's the public transit, where's the rental units, where's the open space? Why are the developers spending so much to push the "go" button/ I smell a rat somewhere and a lot of rubbing hands, circling the wagons to get their piece of the pie. Better to either toss it, and get real with the needs of the community, and not push em out, like what this project appears like..When the developer is the main financier, there is bound to be conflict of interest in the employment, methods used, and actual end of the day results. So beware buyers of prop G, you may yet see the boon-doggle you created.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is a Miami-based developer all over a project in San Francisco? If this project is truly viable, why hasn't a local developer been interested in the development? As correctly stated here, this development is to remote to be accessible by public transit and sounds like more vehicles on our already crowded freeways and streets. Something here just doesn't seem to add up.
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Juan Pardell said:
What makes more sense, is to build an arena, comparable to Staples Center in Los Angeles, as part of the master development plan for the Seawall 337 property. Being that baseball and basketball seasons overlap each other, the synergy would be perfect for the area. Its time to bring back the Warriors. Personally, I don't like attending games at Oracle Arena. The area has no other activity and the BART station is dangerous, especially in the evening hours. Placing an arena on the Giants parking lot, would stimulate year round activity, which translates into "mucho" sales tax revenue for the city. Hunters Point, is still too remote for those wishing to take public transportaion to an event. Frankly, I'm in favor of two locations for the football stadium: The former Schlage Lock property and the parcel across from the airport.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Beware of Lennar said:
Lennar has lost about 2 BILLION dollars in the last year. They will shrivel up and die any day now! Down in So Cal at the former El Toro Marine base, they could not afford to pay the contractor to rip out the runways. So the contractor left and with only 2% of the runways removed. So look for Lennar to bail out on Hunters Point and leave a mess. It is time to find a new developer soon!
47 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
West Coast Liberal said:
Gee, Wally, those genetically designed organisms eat real live radioactive waste so our old Naval dump can be gentrified and the Navy can get more money for land the people own already. It's a miracle. Thank you Miracle bacteria for making those bad 'ol ions go away.Didn't they "cap" Chernobyl?
41 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree