
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
Carroll County, Md. (Map, News) - A Carroll County mother faces a possible $150 fine or jail time on Tuesday for failing to show up for jury duty in October because she was breast-feeding her infant son.
Elizabeth Jett of Eldersburg said she tried to get out of jury service until next summer, but Carroll County court officials would not extend the time.
Then she was held in contempt by Judge Barry Hughes in January.
Carroll County Jury Commissioner Corinda Manuel disputes parts of Jett’s account of the case, but ultimately said she had no discretion to extend Jett’s service beyond January, as she requested. “I don’t make the laws, I just follow them,” Manuel said.
That’s why Sen. Nancy Jacobs has again introduced legislation to exempt a mother breast-feeding a child under the age of 2 from jury duty. Senate Judicial Committee Proceedings Chairman Brian Frosh has also written to Chief Judge Robert Bell of the Court of Appeals. Frosh asked him to take action “to ensure that the statewide policy for excusal from jury service is family-friendly.”
“As you know,” Frosh told Bell, “there’s strong sentiment in the General Assembly in favor of requiring exemption from jury service for nursing mothers such as Ms. Jett.”
“I really hope we don’t have to get in the business of passing laws for every excuse you may have for jury duty,” Frosh said.
Bell told The Examiner, “There’s not a whole lot we can [do] at this point” for Jett, since there is already a court judgment. But he said he is referring the matter to the Council on Jury Use and Management.
Calling the situation “a gigantic misunderstanding,” Frosh said, “I don’t know who’s to blame.”
Jett said they she wrote a letter asking for postponement of service. “I don’t have the money to pay for child care,” Jett said. She is a former teacher and stay-at-home mother with a 5-year-old son, Julian, and an infant son, Henry. Then in January, she was called in to “talk” to the judge, but found herself at a hearing at which Hughes held her in contempt.
Manuel said Jett had not responded to the initial letters about jury duty, and after having her written request denied, did not show up for duty Oct. 9.
At that point, Jett called and sought to be excused that day, but her request was denied.
“I do not excuse liberally,” Manuel said. She said Jett was offered dates in January, but the woman said that was not enough time to find day care. Then she was held in contempt of court.
llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
10:31 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
1:21 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
3:11 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
1:11 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
1:07 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
9:30 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
5:36 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Case dropped against mother who skipped out on jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
11:16 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:28 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 25, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
2:58 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:22 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:12 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
11:24 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:37 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:24 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:15 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:07 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
9:27 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
8:52 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
6:38 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
5:34 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
4:17 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
3:38 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:31 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
12:09 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
11:35 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
11:30 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
10:05 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
9:45 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
8:34 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding Maryland mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
7:06 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
3:37 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Breast-feeding mom faces fine for refusing jury duty"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Everybody is still harranging about the BF baby. I would like to know, are the courts supposed to take everyones word about the excuses for not doing jury duty? If the courts were to be really liberal in the excuses, there would be maybe 20 people each day that would not mind doing jury duty. The rest of the pool for that day would not show up. The general public needs to understand that the court system and jury duty no matter how bad it may be is a necessary evil. How would you feel about being tried and convicted without jurist prudence? People need to understand that it is not the efforts of the courts to make life difficult, just to get the job done as efficiently and effectively as humanly possible. Do not blame the court officials thay are only upholding the laws that our legislature put into practice. I should know, I have worked in the court system for over 20 years. It is very convenient for everybody to think that court workers don't have a heart!
2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe the breast pump should never have been invented. For all those guys who think that it is so easy, just hook yourself up to an electric breast pump, or maybe try a cheap manual one. Go for it. Besides this conundrum is about the infant, not about the mother.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
jury duty is a responsibility. what ever this woman has to do, i have responsibilities that i consider important. yet as a male if i tried to tell the court that reasoning, i wuold get a visit from the sheriff. living in this country requires sacrifices. get he a breast pump.
2 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Stupid people know more than you know. Never underestimate. Spin Spin
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have proof that a breastfeed baby is smarter .And that is what we need more of because there are a lot of stupid people out there who do not know what they are talking about. This mother did right by her baby and not the court system.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I just read this article if that mother went to jury duty and decided not to breastfeed her child she would be called on by the social services for not taking care of her child. What is more important in this case the child being taken care of by a responsible mother or putting another person in jail that your tax payers money will be taking care of for about 10 to 20 yrs in jail you all choose. You all need to decide who is more important her child or the person going to jail you people need to grow up and fast and get your priorties straight.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What is in the Pandora's box that Nancy Jacob's staff speak of? In Ms. Jett's case she is caring for a dependent. I, for one, and I think most people have empathy for infants that need their mothers, the elderly with dementia that rely on family caregivers, the disabled that rely on family members, people who are spending hours weekly undergoing dialysis, and individuals in the middle of chemotherpay. We live in a populated area and should not have to rely on the "weakest" members of society to fill juror rolls.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The citizen rights first begin with self and family. We are human beings and the courts should be humane to citizen who are called to server but can't because of issues that prevent total concentration of their civic duty. Find another juror!
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
While I belive she could have gone about things better (like following up on the denial), I also believe she should have been excused from JD for breastfeeding. I also believe that she should not be fined for not showing up, she apperently thought she had done all that she needed to do. I am BFing now and my son WILL NOT take a bottle. We've tried. So for all of you that say "just go by a breastpump" it's not that easy! I'm sure they would take a bottle if they got hungry enough, but is that right to make a baby scream thier head off for hours, starving, not understanding they don't get thier booby, they have to eat from this rubber, wierd shaped and feeling thing. And don't forget the time you have to give a mom who does pump~at least 30 minutes every 3 hours or so, plus lunch so mom can eat too! A nursing mom needs extra calories and fluids too, so will they allow snacks and drinks in the courtroom? So for those who have never BF'd, you have NO IDEA what you are talkign a
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Becki said:
I just saw this story on my afternoon news. WOW! I am still realing. I didn't hear this young mom say she wanted "out of jury duty" just to "postpone" it. Crazy. Talk about asking too much from the courts! (sarcastic) Also, someone form the court was interviewed and he said something like 'If we make exceptions for breast feeding, then we would have to make exceptions for kidney dialisys and chemo-therapy'.OMIGOSH! I will never move there!!!!!!!!! are they kidding me??? I had to re-listen to that several times. Unbelieveable!
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a court employee who formerly worked in the Jury Office in another jurisdiction, I can see both sides of the coin. My question to everyone out there who feels that jury duty is not a necessity is "Would you rather judgement be handed down by a professional jurist? If you can say yes, than you have neglected to really think of the repercussions of having professional jurists. Also, what do you believe when faced with someone over the telephone telling you that she is a breastfeeding mother? I feel that some sort of arrangement could be made, however it poses difficulty to both sides. With an ever shrinking pool of qualified or willing jurors, what is the judicial system supposed to do? There is more to this situation than meets the eye. I do not beleive she would have been turned down if she had showed up in October for the initial date, but an example must be made somewhere, she just happend to be it!
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
FYI for those who have no clue--some babies will not take a bottle once on the breast-also a nursing baby eats every hour and ahalf to two hours-if mom does not pump or feed her breast will become engorged-which can cause a plugged duct which is very painful-if that is not fixed she can then get mastitis which has flu like symptons-I think more people should educate themselves about breastfeeding and not just how healthy it is for baby but how it affects the mother as well!
24 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In my lifetime, I have both breastfed my children and, at a much later time, served jury duty. I think with today's longevity that society does not need to rely on breastfeeding mothers to create a juror pool. As for my jury duty, I was involved in a highly publicized case which was far more emotionally-laden than most people bargain for. I would not have wanted to see a nursing mother exposed to that amount of stress. Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis said, "If you bungle raising your children I don't think whatever else you do matters very much". The mother in question has taken a stand to make sure that her infant is taken care of correctly. What more should society ask of her at this stage of her life?
19 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jeff, an Independent said:
Is the mother breast feeding the kid all day long? (I mean is the kid attatched 24 hours a day?) No empathy from me. You can still report to the court at the very least and get a waiver. Remember, the woman didn't even show up. Fed Up, et. al, you have a civic duty to perform when you are asked to serve jury duty. By the way, it is compulsory. You can be held in contempt (or in this case, fined) for not reporting to the court. Civics 101
14 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Gee, fed up, I guess it is too much to ask people to participate in their government. Perhaps the system is corrupt because people like you are too good to serve their community. Can't be bothered. I imagine it must be too much work to vote, also. Keep taking from this country and giving nothing back.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
fed up said:
I'am sorry i don't feel you should be made to go to jury duty. I'am tired of the whole corrupt system.Pick people who like doing this.
10 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This gal exercised her right to choose. Now she pays the consequences. My goodness, she failed to make a REQUIRED appearance as a juror. She could have paid a sitter less that the $150 fine.
12 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The biggest challenge of the 21st century is not going to be Iraq or the economy, but the preservation of the family. Here is a woman who made a judgment as to what was best for her family, and a judge fined her for NOT neglecting the needs of her infant.
17 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How outragious! I was lucky to be excused from jd after going down to the court and signing a paper that stated I was still breastfeeding, and didn't have childcare. For all the know it alls with their 2 cents: my child has never had a bottle and never will! So pumping is out of the question. I hope the courts will overturn this decision and realize how important it is to breastfeed and be able to be there for your child and not pursacute her for being an outstanding mother!
14 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Here's a mother doing the right thing, and providing care and attention for her baby and she's being castigated by this system. It's not just a matter of saying "well, put the baby on formula." Newsflash: baby's don't opt out of their feeding patterns for one day! Anyone that's taken the time to care for one knows this. And I'm a man. On the other hand, wild and ruthless neglect of children runs rampant in this city and no one seems to care. What kind of ridiculous ethic does this teach? Straining at gnats and swallowing camels.
35 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Jury duty is an obligation. Deal with it. The notice doesn't say pretty please. Then again, most people have so sense of duty to society, only to themselves.
16 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is eggregious intrusion by the government into family life. If judges and court commissioners don't have enough good sense to know that a mother's right and duty to care for her child take precedence over serving on a jury, the legislature obviously needs to lay that out clearly for them in the law.
30 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm wondering if Wayne ever pumped his breasts? Maybe only a woman can understand this
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
women want to be treated equal but want special privileges , she disrespected the court and deserves to be held in contempt
28 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Boo Hoo said:
One of my children would not take a bottle of anything. They need her so badly that they can't excuse her for a year? Ridiculous. What a bunch of power-crazy bureaucrats.
18 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hey, 4:17PM, do tell all how the "smart" ones get out of jury duty. I am sure we would all like to be enlightened; especially the breastfeeding mothers.
28 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If you are ordered to Jury duty, and you aren't smart enough to get out of it, you go, period. Everyone has money problems and time problems, it seems as if some people think they are special. This woman obviously didn't take the court seriously, and will be fined accordingly. This article is not newsworthy.
12 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Captain Jack said:
Not everyone has people/resources that can watch over an infant. My question is how many people posting with no sympathy to Mrs. Jett actually are mothers that actually breastfed? Please be respectful and not ignorant.
19 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
From DC said:
Go buy a breast pump, get the childs' grandparents or someone close to the family to watch the baby, go to jury duty like everyone else, and quit with the b.s. sob story.
18 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
fed up said:
No one should be made to serve on jury duty.They worry more about who doesn't show up then the illegals that are over here .
33 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Excuse me sir, but Ms. Jett is on a LEAVE OF ABSENCE which means she is not paid! Jury duty would require her to pay daycare for an infant--which can be as much as or more than $1,000 a month.
12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is a real hardship and expense to serve jury duty. I guess I was lucky to have gotten out of jury duty in Baltimore County when I was a stay-at-home, breast-feeding mother. The reality is that jury duty is a sacrifice no matter who has to do it. The cost of parking in the city was more than I got for jury duty!
24 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe this is happening. In DC where I live, a lot of people throw out their jury summons and don't even show up for jury duty. That is, except all the young white kids from out of town, who don't yet know how things are done here in DC.
14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Whiner!
28 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is exactly why I have refused to serve jury duty in Anne Arundel County on 3 occassions. I have NO RESPECT for the Kangaroo Courts that are controlled by that Blonde Bimbo B_T_H Pam North and the Idiot Silkworm. AACo judges overturn jury decisions regularly. First Amendment rights give me the right to voice my protest. I WILL NEVER SERVE JURY DUTY IN MD!
22 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Judge Barry Hughes, Corinda Manuel, and Chief Judge Robert Bell need to learn the meaning of the word misogynist. As to Manuel's quote, "I don't make the laws, I just follow them, what could sound more like Nazi Germany. As far as comments about nursing a baby made under this "comments" section, if you have never nursed an infant you have no voice in this matter, period.
33 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wayne, Parkton said:
Is she implying that if she weren't breast feeding she could have served? Someone with a teaching degree should be able to figure out what a breast pump is for. There are many folks with limited resources who have to find care for their children while they report for jury duty, what makes her so special? She had plent of time to make arrangements so quit whinning.
33 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark said:
I'm sure this judge has no problem being "liberal" when it comes to administering "justice". Oh wait, he's not in Baltimore City. At any rate the woman should have been excused from JD. The care of an infant should trump any "obligation" to the courts.
33 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
avid reader said:
What the hell kind of insensitive system do we have. She would have probably been arrested for breast feeding in public. Let her go.
29 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree