Lake needs cleanup, warnings, supe says
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Anar Pureverdene, 3, feeds the birds at Mountain Lake in the Presidio on Monday. The lake has come under fire for pollution.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
Anar Pureverdene, 3, feeds the birds at Mountain Lake in the Presidio on Monday. The lake has come under fire for pollution.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The reportedly slow response to cleaning up one of San Francisco’s last remaining natural lakes in the idyllic Presidio is drawing criticism by a supervisor who now wants signs installed alerting passers-by to the dangers.

A 2000 study by students on pollen levels in the area led to the discovery of “high concentrations of lead” and pesticides in Mountain Lake, according to Doug Kern, who sits on the Presidio Restoration Advisory Board.

A hearing on the lake’s toxicity before the Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee was called by Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier to pressure state and federal officials to resolve clean it up, she said.

“I am worried about the fact that children and animals are still playing in the water,” said Alioto-Pier, who represents the neighborhoods surrounding the lake.

The District 2 official said she wants signs put up along the shoreline “saying that this is a toxic site” and closing it off to swimmers and pets, and said she would introduce legislation for the signs at today’s meeting of the full board.

Presidio Trust Executive Director Craig Middleton said that while there “there is significant lead in the lake” it’s not posing a “human health problem.”

“This is not a dire situation at the moment. It’s something we should clean up. It’s got ecological implications and some implications to animals and people who might get into the sediment and stir it up a little bit,” Middleton told the supervisors Monday.

Middleton said that he suspected the lake was contaminated prior to 1999, when the Army handed over the Presidio to the Trust; the Army, however, determined then that the lake was clean, he said.

Middleton said that run-off from Highway 1, which flows into the lake, likely caused the lead contamination, from when cars ran on lead-based gasoline.

The Trust has been in talks with the Army and Caltrans about funding mitigation and cleanup efforts, Middleton said. To prevent road runoff, it would cost about $2.5 million and cleaning up the lake would cost about $8 million, Kern said.

Alioto-Pier said she would conduct meetings with interested parties to ensure resources and plans are in place to assure the lake’s cleanup. Caltrans has agreed to be a part of those meetings, Chief Deputy District Director Dan McElhinney told board members.

“It really needs to be a political solution now. There is no doubt that there’s contamination,” Kern said. “We just have state and federal agencies going back and forth.”

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:45 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Public given voice for 45 more days"

Examiner Reader said:
How does this museum/hotel project fit into the current or historical tone of the Presidio? Simply put, it does not.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:49 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

parkpal said:
The fact is that the "preferred alternative" for the large art museum and hotel still chooses the awful location right next to the Spanish era presidio wall and the flagpole of a 200 year old National HIstoric Site. Why? Because Mr. Fisher says that he will take his marbles and play somewhere else if he cannot get that exact central location, where his huge white museum overwhelms the historic character to the Presidio. The Presidio is not some vacant lot to be played with by wealthy developers. It is sacred ground in the history of California and our nation. Save it from desecration.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:19 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Plans paint new picture for art museum"

Examiner Reader said:
If Sam Singer is speaking for someone, you know that they are up to no good. When will the dung stuck to Singers' expensive shoes after stepping in it for his clients over and again stick to Singer?

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

Examiner Reader said:
How much city staff time and resources will go into this revived group? I am concerned that the city's minimal resources will be unnecessarily used to support neighborhood groups who are well organized and will surely submit comments to the Presidio Trust on their own anyway. I'm supportive of these groups sending the Trust their comments, but why does the city need to foot the bill?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:39 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

marian price said:
So Sam Singer says the Fishers have received overwhelming support for the idea. Are there any who are not employees or cronies of the Fishers who believe the majority of Park users will laud the replacement of open space and bowling alley for this purpose. Borrowing a word from an outspoken British critic of out-of-context architectural extravaganzas, it will be a carbuncle of the face of the Presidio.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

Examiner Reader said:
Once again, everyone, including Supervisor Alioto-Pier, should consider the concept of moving the bloody mess to Shorenstein's Pier 29-31 development where Donald Fisher could walk to visit his MGM Grand collection. Don't even have to alter the architect's drawings. I think it would be a great save for the Main Parade Ground!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

Examiner Reader said:
For two hundred years the parade ground area in the Presidio has been and historic landmark for San Francisco Residents. It is hard to understand the Presidio Trust allowing a hotel/theatre complex and now a modern monolithic art museum to desecrate this lovely site. I applaude the Service's decision. However, the Park Service has shown itself subject to political pressure in the past. Let us hope that it will continue its opposition to this ill conceived project. There are other areas of the Presidio, such as the area near Baker Beach, which have lovely views and easy access for these projects if they must be built. I really don't see the need for another hotel, there are several being built in SF, nor a movie complex in the Presidio. It is difficult to get there and more mutilation will be needed for traffic/parking. My wifes' and my family have lived here for well over a hundred years-we are dedicated to this unique city and its historic richness. Please restrain the P

8 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:06 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

parkpal said:
It is about time that the Park Service asserted itself to protect the Presidio from development. It is a National Park, after all, and belongs to you and me, not a bunch of Bush political appointees who run the Presidio Trust like a business park. Go! Park Service!

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:16 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 26, 2008 re: "Lake needs cleanup, warnings, supe says"

Examiner Reader said:
I grew up near the lake. It is very dirty and the homeless wash themselves there.

44 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.28 seconds)