Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
A bill introduced Wednesday by state Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, would allow local governments to order property owners to replace every demolished rent-control unit with an equivalent rent-control unit somewhere in The City.
“[The bill] would enable local governments to find a very disciplined and straightforward way to keep rent-control units available for the citizenry,” Migden said.
Most of San Francisco’s 320,000 housing units are lived in by renters, according to U.S. Census data.
Of the rental units, 91 percent are rented at city-mandated rent-controlled prices, according to San Francisco Rent Arbitration and Stabilization Board figures.
In the last decade, more than 650 rental units in The City have been demolished, board figures show. A 19-year-old state law prevents cities such as San Francisco from imposing rent-control conditions on any newly built units.
The Residential Builders Association of San Francisco will likely support the bill if it doesn’t affect building projects that have already started, according to President Sean Keighran.
“We need housing policies that are going to address our lack of new rental housing,” he said. “Nobody is really addressing that issue right now.”
But the proposal was criticized by the Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute, which mainly represents owners of two-, three- and four-unit apartment buildings.
“Obviously, if a building is being torn down, then it’s being torn down for a reason — that the building has deteriorated and needs to be rebuilt,” SPOSFI President David Fix said. “But somebody’s not going to rebuild housing if it’s going to be under the same price controls.”
San Francisco Tenants Union Executive Director Ted Gullicksen praised the bill.
“Most of the renters in San Francisco would not be able to live here if it weren’t for rent control,” he said. “At this point, it’s impossible for the number of rent-control units to increase.”
Gullicksen added that, under present law, an earthquake could wipe out San Francisco’s entire rent-control stock in a single day because it would be illegal for The City to order them to be replaced.
Migden aide Eric Potashner said the legislation was suggested by the San Francisco Tenants Union, a decades-old renters’ advocacy group, and by Supervisor Chris Daly.
Daly said The City will take advantage of the legislation if it passes.
Owner-occupied units*1.....126,700
Renter-occupied units*1.....195,800
Rent-controlled units*2.....179,000
Sources: *1. U.S. Census, 2. San Francisco Rent Arbitration and Stabilization Board



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:13 PM MST on Sun., Feb. 24, 2008 re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
4:22 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
4:02 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
3:31 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
2:51 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
1:50 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Bill aims to maintain rent-controlled units"
Report as inappropriate
King of the Dynasty said:
Myth: Rent control keeps rents down. Reality: The guy getting the bargain rent is subsidized by the newest high rent tenants. Reality: Rent control discourages the building of new apartments and that means that SF has too little supply for the demand. This also leads to increased rents. We need to unwind ourselves from the rent control boa constrictor.
39 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Replentish?
40 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The cost of rebuilding and the rent will be so out of proportion you won't be able to make any money leaving property owners to subsidize even more than they do now. Get rid of rent control. Bull on how many people can't afford to live here. My neighbor only pays $950 (everyone else in the building is paying $1,600+ for same unit) for a 1 bedroom but is pulling in a six figure income.
49 agree | 43 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
logicbomb said:
This should be a city -- not state -- law.
40 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
California P. O. and Farmers Act is a sham. It's just a bunch of greedy landlords who want to live off the backs of some renters. Eminent Domain can be addressed in simpler, easier ways.
38 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
IndiVoter said:
Makes me want to vote even more for the California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act.
51 agree | 40 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree