My neighbor the tax-scam artist
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Harriette Walters, the alleged ringleader of the most massive corruption scandal in D.C. history, is my neighbor. Who knew?

I don’t share a fence with Walters. But her modest brick house is certainly in my neighborhood. I drive by her place often, it’s on my regular bike route along Rock Creek Park. I pick up soccer balls for my kid’s team down the street.

So I dropped by yesterday morning and knocked on the door. I didn’t expect to meet Ms. Walters. Prosecutors have charged her with creating fake tax refund checks that she and others would cash. They say the scam had been running since 1989, until it was exposed last year. Feds now say the network siphoned off more than $20 million from the D.C. tax office. Walters is being held in jail without bond. No one came to the door of her home on Oregon Avenue.

But proximity breeds questions, from prosaic to practical to profound: Were her kids in school with one of my daughters at Lafayette Elementary? How did she pull off the scam for 19 years? Where did the dough go?

The cash didn’t go into the outside of her brick rambler at the corner of Oregon and Dogwood, facing Rock Creek Park. It has a screened-in back porch, two-car garage, garden hose neatly rolled up. This part of Chevy Chase, D.C., is not too pricey. Up the street at the semigated Unicorn Lane, where the African-American elite resides, town homes go for seven figures. Walters’ place wouldn’t bring that much, the feds will find should they try and sell it.

How did Walters keep her scam going for so long? The feds have described the hard facts of fake checks to straw companies, but how did she keep her dozens of co-workers quiet? Short answer: She bought their silence.

As one former prosecutor tells me, there are two kinds of hush money: One is a one-time payoff to silence someone who has direct knowledge of a crime; the second comes in a series of small gifts that might be rationalized as generosity.

Walters apparently applied the second variety. She bestowed wads of cash to co-workers for cars and renovations and vacations. Some got gifts of $20,000, “given away like cookies,” according to one investigator.

When was the last time your office mate gave you a brownie and a bunch of $20s?

Which begs the next question: Why did no one tip off authorities? Tax workers had plenty of chances, with an anonymous hotline and anti-corruption training. Tax office higher-ups call it “a willful blindness.” I call it a slow and steady slide toward greed, abetted by a reluctance to snitch, and the building of a wall of silence, akin to the one that protected Marion Barry for years while he was addicted to cocaine.

Finally, where’s the $20 million? The sad fact is that if my neighbor gave it away, feds will never get it back.

Unless it’s buried beneath the house on Oregon Avenue.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:09 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Fear factor 2: D.C. Residents fear thugs more than cops"

Examiner Reader said:
Great article D.C. Examiner! Many of my cops in my neighborhood are so afriad of getting complaints by the criminals because the city nor the police their department supports them. Many cops tell me that the criminals are not afriad of the criminal justice system in DC, and that it is a known joke. A young cop that I have known since he was a little boy tell me he thought he would never leave the D.C. police force, but now he is applying to other departments.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:08 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
After reading some of Charles comments - it appears that he tried to get a job as a police officer and no one hired him.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:06 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
Charles why don't go put a police uniform on and try to police for just one day. I bet you get your ass kicked in the first day. Who will you cry to then.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:48 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Charles said:
Dear "Examiner Reader"--rotten apples are damaging MPDC as much as misquided leadership. They are corrupting new recruits. They are impeding reforms and clean up efforts. They are damaging MPDC reputation and standing. Rotten apples are to be thrown away. MPDC efforts might be misquided, the method used might be counterproductive; yet, the principle is right. Barry and Williams' hiring spree brought all kind of second-class officers; they destroyed a fine police department. FYI, the only time I had to come back from work to escort my wife home was when a "big and threatning" DC police officer scarred the hell out of her, a small woman with two young children. A former CA police officer I worked with has even harsher words about lax law enforcement and bizarre practices. Good cops have to be recognized, bad ones fired. Whether or not FOP like it.

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:20 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
Great idea Charles! The Department cannot hire enough officers now and loses hundreds every year to other departments. So let's make things worse for the working police officers. That will attract plenty of new qualified people. Every police department in the country is hiring like crazy, so what a great time to completely alienate the rank and file.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:57 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Charles said:
When a poorly trained police force meets arrogant thugs and so-called activists, the result is messy. Harry got is mostly right. Yet, he got it wrong when he criticizes clean up efforts--how can you improve training, management, and efficiency when your effort are undermined by crooked officers and there union? Remember FOP shuned Fenty for its efforts--a take-over of MPDC by DC government is now due. It worked for the schools. As for the rest, there is a simple lesson learned by the US army in Iraq: you don't control ground with cavalry--infantry controls. It's hot out there, but what a Marines does in Bagdad, a DC cop can certainly do it in North East. Here's the formula: more administrative support + more local police stations + leaner & cleaner police department + foot patrol + plain cloth officers = more arrests (less crime depends on other socio-economic factors). PS: Police officers and their horses should arrive at 6pm, not leave. Crime does not peak at lunch time

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:26 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
The Mayor and Council and Police Chief don't get it, it is as old as dirt, when you are trying to cover your criminal activities, you file mostly bogas complaints against the Police Dept. or specific Officers then you restrict their enforcement efforts or cause them to be reassigned due to an investigation of a citizen complaint and of course the thug shares it with the other thugs. Even if it is bogas the complaint remains in a file on the Officer, regardless of the findings.Only in this city for which sadly I am a citizen and sees it to often.

4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:03 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
This city doesn't get it! All there good police officers are leaving MPD. The surrounding police agenices are getting our best officers and the city does not care.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
Say what you will, but this type of discipline was brought to DC by the Ramsey regime. He has done as much damage to MPD as Barry did to DC, and it will years and years to fix.

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:50 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
D.C. mentality--blame the police first. D.C. political leadership-- blame the police first and institute inane rules and regulations. Solution: STOP THIS INANE LEADERSHIP AND PUT IN SOMEONE WITH COMMON SENSE.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:07 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Fear factor 1: Police lose control of the streets"

Examiner Reader said:
Unless you have been stooped in that section of DC you have no idea what the police due. My daughter who was expecting (7 months) was pulled from her car and thrown up against another car. They could clearly see her condition. She was just there visiting a friend.She has no criminal record and has never been arrested in her life. Her car is insured and had no traffic violations. So I can understand how the residents feel that they are being targeted by the police. As far as the complaints against the police who are doing there jobs, well guess what they are never found guilty on any charges. They speak to the residents with such lack of respect. If they used a little more tack with them maybe they would be more wanted in the neighborhood. I know that my daughter was spoken to with such racial slur's it would curl your toes to know that the police would speak to anyone that way. So until the police change there less then professional attitude, crime in DC will be just that.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:51 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Examiner Reader said:
Hooray -- I'd love to see more substantive oversight of Neil Albert's office. Between the corruption and the incompetence, that shop is a disaster. Read the Inspector General's recent report on construction projects at Parks & Rec. Many were initiated by Albert in the same kind of mindless deal-making frenzy he's now brought to DMPED. And the results were badly constructed facilities delivered late and grossly over-budget. This is the type of development the Council should prevent! Let's slow down and do this stuff right. The stakes are too high to mess up so many deals at once.

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:10 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "It’s not open space, but new office will be green"

Examiner Reader said:
" Wouldn’t it be nice if that prime corner was grassed over and turned into a park, so we could breathe deeper and have a longer vista?" Um, like the park directly. across. the. street. ? My dear Mr Jaffe, I dearly love parks and fervently believe in their ability to save us from flooding during heavy downpours and in keeping us cool. But the fact that you neglected to mention that there is a park caddy corner to that building leaves me scratching my head a bit. Honestly, why was this article written? "So we can expect an environmentally friendly office building with a modern look." Well, destroying a building and then building a building is not really my idea of green, but whatever. I think most enviros these days agree that the best way to go about greening is to take existing structures and retrofit them. Destruction and building are extremely energy intensive. Not to mention all the possibly toxic chemicals released into the air with the building's destruction.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "It’s not open space, but new office will be green"

Examiner Reader said:
As long as it's got a huge garage underneath it, it will never be a "green" building. It will be a nice energy efficient building that suburbanites travel miles to in huge pollution-spewing steel cages. A building is not environmentally friendly if it facilitates the suburban drive-everywhere lifestyle.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:41 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "D.C. GOP still dissing democracy"

Mexicans Without Borders must leave too!!!! said:
Supreme Court ruling was the correct interpretation of the Amendment. They did the right thing.

8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:18 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 29, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
I totally agree. The entire nation now knows what DC has already found out! With DC not having state representation, he was the last person who should have asked the court to hear the case. It's not mayors who should thank him for his bungle. It's all govenors and state legislatures that should thank him. Mayors of cities just don't do that, particularly in DC and he was essentially reminded of that in one of the court's opinions. Again his arrogance and his "need to be" syndrome yielded yet another negative perception for our city.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
Everyone knew that this was a losing case given the current makeup of the Supreme Court. Despite strong advice to the contrary from the AG's Office, it was Mayor Fenty who decided to ask the Court to hear this case. It was purely a political decision on the Mayor's part, so that he could be perceived as strong on guns and he could blame the Court when the inevitable outcome would be to hold that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to bear arms. The entire Nation has Adrian Fenty to thank for this terrible ruling. Because of Fenty, City's throughout the Country will have to modify their laws. Had Fenty just listened to the advice of the experts, no one else would be dealing with the ramifications--only DC. Mayors throughout this Country should remember to thank Fenty when the repeal of own trigger lock laws result in accidental shootings of children.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:29 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
This column would have been more compelling if you had offered even one constructive idea for how to "make it harder for criminals to get, keep, use and reuse guns."

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:08 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Examiner Reader said:
That's such a load of malarky.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
As a DC resident I am glad that the gun ban was struck down. The city's death rate was it's highest under the ban so I don't see how anyone can claim that it was successful. DC Gov't is going to find a way to avoid following the Supreme Court decision because they love to control and oppress their citizens and sadly a lot of the citizens prefer this "big government tactic" due to laziness and/or ignorance. And just a reminder GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE; PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.

7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:09 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "District residents are pawns in Supreme Court gun case"

Examiner Reader said:
I saw this article just today - the day that the Supreme Court struck down DC's gun law of 32 years. Just a correction....Ron Moten of the Peaceaholics was definitely there to protest the Court's interference in our laws...but also present was me, Anise Jenkins, of StandUp! for Democracy in DC Coalition (Free DC). I participated very loudly and passionately in the "face off" holding my own against those from outside of DC who had their own selfish reasons for wanting to strike down our gun laws. Let the residents of the nations' capital have some constitutioal rights...like voting for our own members of Congress since we pay the highest taxes in the nation....and controlling our own budget (statehood - is what we need)....AND the right to determine if we want guns in our community or not!!! Keep the 2nd amendment, we already decided we don't want it! Free DC! Statehood NOW!

4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:30 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Mike Licht said:
RE: Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development -- Councilmember Brown's beefs aside, what is wrong with this picture? Neil O. Albert headed Parks and Rec when all those substandard structures were built. He is now pushing through development projects worth billions.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:34 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Examiner Reader said:
This is a Kwame Brown set-up. The mayor is already looking to squash the next one who gets the idea of running for mayor. If he has an ounce of common sense, he realizes that he is a one term mayor. But people don't forget which council members confirmed Rhee, Reinoso and now about to confirm Nickles. Voting power is everything. "At will" employees go both ways. It goes to working folks who lost their jobs and have to support their families as well as the politicians who voted to put you in that position.

11 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
Once a crook, always a crook. Barry was the worst Mayor this City ever saw. He led the City into financial ruin and essentially bankrupted the government, while amazingly providing little to no services for citizens. Who recalls that Downtown DC was a boarded-up ghost town during his rein? Who recalls that DC owned 2 snow plows? Who brought us the lowest bond rating and a federal takeover of City finances? Who presided over more City agencies going into court-appointed receivership? All Marion Barry. I laugh today when I see him at Council hearings (he only shows for quick camera appearances) laying into City officials. The government today is monumentally more responsive and professional to citizens than during his tenure, but perhaps he was, or is, too high to remember. He is a shameful man who has brought nothing but disgrace. It's simply amazing that he has the gall to keep $1,000 from METRO above what it cost him. No doubt he'll use it for cocaine. Certainly not to pay taxe

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
If this piece of donkey dung is D.C.'s "strongest voice for the city’s poor and downcast", there's probably no hope for them. When you look up to a loser like Barry, you demean yourself.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
After all the bad things you have to say about Barry, he is still one of the best mayors DC has had in a long time. He s truly about his people. And yes,he has had problems with drugs, but you find someone on capitol hill when has'nt use some type of drug, and I will show you a lier.

9 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
After all the bad things you have to say about Barry, he is still one of the best mayors DC has had in a long time. He s truly about his people. And yes,he has had problems with drugs, but you find someone on capitol hill when has'nt use some type of drug, and I will show you a lier.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:11 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "A pair of new reports describe tale of two cities"

Examiner Reader said:
Insightful analysis of the situation in the city. Indeed, there should be millions to lift kids out of poverty. It's time we cultivated the political will to do it.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:39 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Diamonds in the rough define a different DCPS"

Examiner Reader said:
Finally...someone recognizes that there is a lot of good going on in DCPS!

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:43 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

dottie said:
The Republicans should be glad that someone wants to be a part of their party. I hope Patrick beats her bad. I will become a Republican just to get her out.

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Republican in hiding said:
Wow! A credible Republican candidate surfaces and the GOP leadership attempts to squash him. I can finally make a selection in the GOP primary!!!

9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:00 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Examiner Reader said:
Intimidation & strong arm tactics? Sounds like Ms. Schwartz has those big 'ol granny panties of hers in a twist. Time for a change, people. Keep at it Patrick!

7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

What said:
What, is this a communist party? Since when does a party blackball someone that wants to run for a seat? Especially against someone who tells their staff they can't take any leave and make them cancel their travel plans, because she is running for office and she is Chair of workforce developement, what a joke!!!!!!!!!!

12 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Examiner Reader said:
Go for it, Patrick! D.C. needs you.

10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws"

Examiner Reader said:
Phil is right, gun laws make no difference. Many of our power focused politicians and civil servants don't get it. We must elect leaders who do get it, to reduce violent crime. Phil gets it! When informed citizens, rightly motivated elected officials, police chiefs and judges recognize that guns are not the problem, they will begin to make progress on reversing the steadily declining neighborhoods in DC and other liberal cities. The causes of voilent crimes are a lack of moral basis, the shrinking two parent family, and failure of our educational system. Church, family and schools, all failing. A gun in the hand of a moral person is just a tool for self defense or sport. In the hands of an immoral person, the gun becomes a tool for murder and other violent crime. Solution: Revival of basic morality. Understanding the difference between good and evil, right and wrong. Knowing God, and setting the goal of meeting him by living in accordance with the Ten Commandments.

9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:37 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws"

Mike Licht said:
Re: Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws You say >If cops stop a car and find a gun on the back seat, they can’t arrest the driver for possession because he wasn’t holding it.< I am the only one on my block who is not a lawyer, but my jury experience suggests that MPD officers need a refresher on the principle of Constructive Possession.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:35 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Feds make toxic brew at Fort Reno Park"

Examiner Reader said:
Hi Mr. Jaffe I enjoy your articals in the Examiner and wanted to ask about an underground reservoir at Ft. Reno. Is it true that we collect water there as well as play and have 2-3 schools very nearby. Thanks for keeping an eye on this-Spring Valley has not gone well. JoAnn Tom

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:38 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "What kind of green is the D.C. Council?"

Examiner Reader said:
Good thing the council did. The toxicity comes in the aftermath, with people opposing the road getting called all manner of things from treehugger to nasty neighborhood activist. And worse. There are too many roads in RCP.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:37 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "The mayor, the policeman, the aftermath of a shooting"

Dear Mr. Fenty said:
Working for the citizens means doing what is best for all citizens. Making assumtions about a police officer's actions before an investigation is conducted and using our money to pay for an attempted murderer's funeral are contrary to "working for the citizens" and, I pray you will find on your next re-election campaign, is also contrary to working for the mayor, which is obviously your true agenda.

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:29 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "The mayor, the policeman, the aftermath of a shooting"

Examiner Reader said:
This mayor needs to resign. I think what he did was wrong under any circumstances but to take the stand he did, before the investigation was even completed, is unconscionable. Now he is not even man enough to apologize after an independent agency cleared the officers. I hope the FOP does everything in its power to make sure he is not re-elected.

14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:04 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

MPD Supporter said:
Haskel and Clay.... WE, your brothers and sisters IN LAW, are with you, behind you, beside you, every step of the way! WE applaude your patience with letting this rediculous investigation run it's course. Only a truly riteous person could have risen above all of it. WE are proud to see that despite all the lies, rumors and hateful statements that have been made about you, you have managed to maintained your professionalism and handle the hard times with dignity. They are not over yet, but the day will come when they will be. Until then, be strong and KNOW that we are going through this WITH you! Much Love brothers, MUCH LOVE!

12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:51 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Officer James Haskel tells his side of story"

DC Resident said:
Officer Haskel, thank you for your service to the city. I am sorry this happened to you. You did what you had to do in the situation, and there are many people who support you completely and feel appreciative of your service as a police officer.

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:37 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Klingle Road heads back toward nature"

Examiner Reader said:
I hope it's over, but fear it's not. Someone on the CC has brought the matter (Klingle) back up, or is trying to. I wish we'd nail that coffin shut, once and for all. I am not "elite," but I want that road shut down.

13 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:45 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

The Truth said:
This article is, as every piece of cowardly puppet journalism in DC, completely false in it's attempt to paint OPC in the same light as a Ukranian prison camp. The author is simply another hired bitch of the police department tasked with defending their every move (no matter how corrupt). The DC police are far from the heroic public servants he would have you believe and, in fact have still not managed to get this country's capital city under control. It's better off than it was 20 years ago, but for god's sake it's the CAPITAL of our ENTIRE NATION and the police cannot stop one single crime spree!!!! Perhaps instead of this shameful article, the author should try his hand at some legitamite reporting....but that just wouldn't be his style now would it.

12 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:38 PM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

DC Lawyer said:
Gee, I wonder if "CommonSenseDC" works for the office of police complaints. No one in their right mind would attest to the truth and accuracy of something they did not write and were not given an opportunity to correct or amend. The police are not trying to be above the law. They want the same rights as our society gives to everyone else. By the way, who really files these complaints? Ordinary citizens? I don't think so. It's the thugs who know they can use this OPC procedure to retaliate against good cops. The system needs fixing. Thank you Mr. Jaffe for shedding some light on the subject.

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

CommonSenseDC said:
I hear that both citizens and the police have to provide signed, written statements to the Office of Police Complaints, attesting to the truth and accuracy of their accounts. If a cop is unwilling to attest to that, then maybe the officer is trying to cover something up. The old blue wall of silence. I don't think the police should be above the law. Gulag, Schmoo-lag.

16 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

DC Lawyer said:
How is the Office of Police Complaints investigation procedure possibly legal? Sounds to me that it is not, and I wonder why the D.C. Council is allowing these kinds of investigations to occur. Also, why is the police department allowing its officers to be subjected to this kind of questioning and forced signature of statements? Shouldn't someone be stepping in to prevent this??

12 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:28 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

Northwest DC said:
No wonder the crime problem in D.C. is escalating, when the city treats its cops so poorly.

16 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:23 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
Why didn't Rhee say she would fight for a good PUBLIC SCHOOL? EXACTLY Let's talk about improve curriculum and standards --- EXACTLY But my thinking is, that was never part of the equation. The problem always was how to privatize the public school system? Harry Jaffe, Marc Fischer never talked about the nuts and bolts of improving ANYthing. It was always wholesale change, bust those damn unions at any price. They've done it now. Now, what?

20 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree