Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
There is nothing more prestigious — especially these days in cycling — than protecting your reputation.
“We’ve not had a rider fail our test in any of the first two years,” said Michael Roth, president of AEG Sports, which puts on the Tour. “Based on our new protocol, which every team has signed, that should remain intact. We are not accepting contracts from teams with open investigations or suspensions.”
Even with the spotless record, that doesn’t mean there haven’t been links to performance-enhancing drug use. Floyd Landis, the winner of the inaugural Tour of California, was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title due to a doping scandal. Also, Michael Rasmussen, a participant in the first two California races, was leading last year’s Tour de France when his team pulled him out of that event due to drug accusations.
Less than two weeks ago, high-profile teams Astana and High Road were barred from participating in the Giro d’Italia for their previous connections to doping. Astana features defending Tour of California champ Levi Leipheimer and High Road has George Hincapie, another top American.
“Anything that makes the sport look bad, we’re disturbed by,” Roth said.
Among the new testing developments for this year’s Tour, all riders will have to submit pre-race blood samples and daily winners and the overall leader will be tested after each stage for banned substances including EPO, steroids and masking agents.
“I think it’s a great system and for me it’s not even a question of being willing — I’m more than happy to do it,” Jelly Belly rider Bernard van Ulden said. “I would love to see this level of testing at every race.”
Examiner Staff Writer Matt Elliser contributed to this report.



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:26 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 26, 2007 re: "Tour of California won’t pedal through S.F. in 2008"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
As with the tour de france whoever comes up with the most $$ gets the deal. London paid the TDF about $6.5m to start it there. That's on top of the costs associated with putting on the actual event. At the rate the riders are dropping we may not recognize any of them had they started here in the first place-LOL
127 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree