Daly’s measure could ‘kill’ Bayview development
The Potrero public housing area is one of the sites proposed to be rebuilt under a plan that is modeled on a federal program.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
The Potrero public housing area is one of the sites proposed to be rebuilt under a plan that is modeled on a federal program.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A plan for as many as 10,000 new homes in Bayview-Hunters Point — and a possible new stadium for the San Francisco 49ers — would be “killed” if voters this June demanded that 50 percent of the housing be sold below market rates, a top city official said.

Supervisor Chris Daly has championed a ballot initiative to require that at least half of all housing built in the planned Hunters Point-Candlestick Point development be affordable to San Franciscans with household incomes between 30 percent and 80 percent of the county’s median. On Monday, Daly, along with a group of community activists, turned in to The City’s elections department what they said were about 11,000 signatures of the required 7,168 to put the measure on the ballot. The Department of Elections has 30 days to determine if the required number of signatures are valid.

“It will be close, but it should be good,” said Daly, who had attempted to put a similar measure on the ballot with four signatures from members of the Board of Supervisors, but was unable to gain the needed support from his legislative colleagues.

Lennar Corp., the project developer, has stated that 25 percent of the project’s housing 8,000 to 10,000 housing units would be priced below market rates. The project also includes 350 acres of open space, a “clean tech” business campus and a new football stadium if the 49ers decide not to relocate to Santa Clara.

Michael Cohen, director of the Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development, called the Daly-backed measure “extremely dishonest” since even a “cursory review” of it would prove that 50 percent affordability “will render the project completely infeasible.”

The ballot measure, if approved by voters, would “kill what could be one of the most important projects in the city’s history,” Cohen said.

It’s nothing new for Daly to use the ballot to pressure developers into offering more affordable housing or other benefits to The City. In 2004, Daly looked to the ballot to prompt a developer of Trinity Plaza to offer more affordable housing, and in 2005, Daly negotiated with developers of five downtown residential towers, Rincon Hill, to pay a record-setting $55 million in impact fees after threatening to put the development on the ballot.

The City should be doing more to build below-market-rate housing, Daly said, adding that 50 percent is achievable, especially if the developer’s profits are decreased.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:21 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "Daly’s measure could ‘kill’ Bayview development"

Examiner Reader said:
I hate to sound cynical but I wonder what are Supervisor Daly's actual motives are in this case. This area is not even in his district. It is in Supervisor Maxwell's district.

98 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:06 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "Daly’s measure could ‘kill’ Bayview development"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree with poster 10:46. I always wondered about who actually was being pressured (environmental, economic, etc) to leave Bayview area. I visited the area to see for myself and what I got was it the middle class and those who wanted to better themselves blacks (not the very poor who relied heavily on govt pgms). I'm sure there's complex reasons why the poor stay poor for years, while others actually do move on + out the neighborhood, but this is another issue. It seems the City needs to encourage and protect the latter, as a first priority. It bothers me that you never seem to hear the breakdowns of who actually is leaving, but I suspect its middle class blacks or struggling to be. I feel Daly's shortsighted proposal will kill any potential for this area + instead it will remain as is - how disappointing that would be, indeed! I feel Lennar's plan has the most viable, realistic plan that helps to support that community.

90 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "Daly’s measure could ‘kill’ Bayview development"

Examiner Reader said:
I have lived in the Bayview district for 20 years, and I know this place well. I would not support any measure providing low income housing to median incomes unless this criteria specifically targeted our hard working college graduate children who may never know what it means to own a home in San Francisco. Or perhaps special programs for teachers, firefighters, police officers...people who serve the community.

91 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:31 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008 re: "Daly’s measure could ‘kill’ Bayview development"

Examiner Reader said:
I hate to say this but Supervisor Daly has a good idea, but at the wrong location. Hunters Point/Candlestick Park location is still the best place for a new stadium despite its rejection by the Yorks. The Yorks and the city need to renegotiate that site again to make it work for both sides because that location already has easy access to the freeways and Public Transit such as Caltrain and the Muni T-line. I'd rather see affordable housing at the Hunters Point Shipyard site which is being offered as an alternative site for a new stadium.

92 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)