Commentary - Melanie Scarborough: Now it’s anybody but McCain
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - If Republicans continue tomorrow on their self-destructive path and cement John McCain’s status as front-runner, they may well be ensuring victory for Democrats in this fall’s presidential election.

Barack Obama is going to be on the Democratic ticket one way or the other: If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, she will have to select him as her running mate. He has personal appeal that she lacks so profoundly; he represents change that the voters say they want.

Without him, she is just an unlikable retread running on a return to the past. Moreover, after her husband’s artless race baiting before the South Carolina primary, rejecting Obama would be viewed as a racial snub and jeopardize her support among black voters.

But if Obama is the nominee, he does not have to pick her; indeed, he would be wise to select someone else. Choosing Hillary would blunt his message of change and would only saddle him with her baggage — in particular, her husband. The prospect of Bill Clinton trolling the White House again is beyond distasteful.

And while some of Hillary’s supporters actually relish another two-for-one Clinton administration, it could hardly appeal to Obama to have the didactic duo as vice presidents. Dick Cheney is at least discreet in his manipulation of the Bush White House. The Clintons are constitutionally incapable of eschewing center stage.

But regardless of whether he’s on the top or bottom of the ticket, Obama’s presence makes McCain the worst candidate Republicans could choose. Obama’s youth implicitly focuses more attention on McCain’s advanced age. Obama has the Kennedy charisma and the Reagan charm. McCain is arrogant and famously ill-tempered. It is a mistake to underestimate the role likability plays in American politics.

McCain owes his success to left-leaning independents who vote for him in the primaries, but those are the people among whom Obama is rapidly gaining support. To have any chance of winning over conservatives, McCain will have to tack right, driving even more voters who supported him in the primaries into the Obama or Clinton camp.

And McCain is not going to win over conservatives. They despise him — and rightly so. McCain is a consistent supporter of high taxes, expansive government and more limitations on individual freedom. He voted against the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. His most significant legislative achievement was so-called campaign finance reform regulating political advertising, which critics view as an unconstitutional restriction on free speech.

With Ted Kennedy, McCain co-sponsored a bill that would give citizenship to individuals in this country illegally — i.e., inflict on Americans millions of people who have no regard for the rule of law. (Shouldn’t any conservative — indeed, any sentient person — realize that when he finds himself agreeing with Ted Kennedy he should rethink his position?)

McCain is an ardent supporter of REAL ID, the law mandating a national identity card with a scannable bar code that will allow the government to track citizens’ movements. Functioning as an internal passport, the card will have to be presented before entering a public building, opening a bank account, boarding an airplane — even visiting a national park.

And don’t forget that McCain sponsored the legislation creating the Transportation Security Administration, which Americans now say they detest as much as the Internal Revenue Service.

The real problem is that if McCain is the Republican candidate, voters will have no real choice. Those who support America’s presence in Iraq may favor McCain’s stay-the-course position, but Clinton’s proposal for phased redeployment indicates that she would not act rashly.

Regardless of whether the winner is McCain, Clinton or Obama, a conservative will not be elected. Given their inevitable disappointment, many Republicans may not vote at all. Others may vote for Clinton or Obama, merely to spite McCain.

Republican hopes for holding on to the White House were based on a two-part scenario: that Hillary Clinton would be her party’s nominee, energizing the anyone-but-Hillary base. A different Republican candidate could have capitalized on that; McCain has deflated it already. Instead, he has tapped an even stronger conservative sentiment: anyone but McCain.

Examiner Columnist Melanie Scarborough lives in Alexandria.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:45 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Mary Katharine Ham: The food police: No cheap trick"

BadKarma said:
The Veganist Jihad and the Food Stasi won't be satisfied until no one but they can afford to buy food. The ultimate goal of these people is to starve the human race out of existence (exept themselves, of course, because they're so "Enlightened" and "Correct"). The only thing more repulsive about this situation than the Jihad's overall agenda is the blatant racism and classism being exhibited by Councilheifer Perry and her little cohorts. If this garbage legislation passes, I sincerely hope all of South LA files a class-action civil rights suit against them in Federal Court.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:10 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: Who died and made him president?"

Examiner Reader said:
It seems that living in a closet is the only way not to be harassed by the news media on their coverage of this election.the only people that live in closets are bigots.Who died? Our country's dollar,economy and so far 4200 of our fellow men and women overseas.You say McCain has been all over and for 30 years, let me ask you this : where hasn't he been? he has NOT been to the neighborhoods directly impacted by his parties horrible choice of policies(i figure he can't land his private jet there).He has NOT been in contact with mainstream americans.Believe it or not, most of us cannot afford more republican scandals,shady oil deals and if McCain is elected: put a mirror up and ask yourself "who dies now?" More of our sons,daughters, brothers,sisters,mothers,fathers and dear friends in Iraq. I guess you people won't be happy until this issue hits your home and hearts. Bring our troops home(alive)!

4 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:19 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: In Iraq, Obama misses"

Bette S said:
Does anyone ask the question: How much more quickly would this war have been over if there wasn't so much anti-war and political propaganda thwarting the progress of the military?

8 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:49 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Chris Stirewalt: John McCain’s veep vibes"

GLG said:
Three words - Billy Wayne Bailey!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:08 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: Who died and made him president?"

Barely About Barack said:
I guess being away from the media for two weeks means that she missed any coverage of McCain's overseas visits. I thought McCain asked Obama to visit Iraq. Well, he's in the Middle East right now. I thought we were trying to test Obama's foreign policy chops. Well, here's another test. The novelty of "the new guy" gaining some publicly observable international presence is news. The familiarity of McCain visiting international locales is (unfortunately) not, in the eyes of some journalists. I guess this makes up for all of the lazy pundits and columnists who eschewed studying Obama's legislative past, in favor of pumping up his Jeremian Wright connections. Maybe the media should stop focusing on the petty here-and-now media junkets, and start researching these candidates' political histories.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:07 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Reckless Schumer kills a bank, thousands of jobs"

Frieda Choose said:
Thousands of people were put out of a job because of the run caused by Charles Schumer's reckless mouth. Thousands more paid CD penalties because they bought into his hysteria (rather than recognizing that their funds were insured). Evidently this was the "prescriptive measure" Schumer had in mind. Like the OTS said, we'll never know if IndyMac Bank would have survived or failed, absent the panic caused by Schumer. But at least the employees would've enjoyed months (or years) more employment and health insurance coverage, shareholders might have held out some hope of eventual recovery, and the customers who pulled their CDs prematurely would've been spared the penalty consequences of overreaction. Some public servant, that guy.

4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:16 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
Congress, especially the Democrats, need to remember who they represent when they vote on matters that affect the average working family and not on towing the party line to keep their political appointment. I agree, but that also applies to to the GOP. What we really need is for the people of this country to make their voices heard in D.C.. When they tried to push amnesty down our throats, the nation spoke up and they heard it loud and clear. We need to take this country back from the politicians before we become the next Soviet Union.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:55 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
Congress, especially the Democrats, need to remember who they represent when they vote on matters that affect the average working family and not on towing the party line to keep their political appointment.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:14 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
If Pelosi and Reid end up with Obama in the White House we, America, will end up a third rate Socialist country with in two years. The democrates have done nothing to get us off of foreign oil, protect our borders, or support the war on terrorism. Obama will have a blank check to appoint liberal federal and supreme court judges that will dismantal our Constitution word by word. The American tax payer can not afford to have Pelosi, Reid and Obama in power. If you think your gasoline bill is high now, it will pale in comparrison to your tax bill. The tax collectors already collect 2 to 3 times the amount of money that oil companies make in profit. The bulk of that profit funds retirement accounts not oil executives. They hold about 1.5 percent of the stock.

13 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:14 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
If you think Pelosi & Co is bad, just wait till Obama is elected. It scares the he!! out of me to think where this nation is headed with socialists like Obama and Pelosi. Every day I hear people talk about the 'right' to vote and the 'right' to health care. Where in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights does it guarantee these? Nowhere. It amazes me how few have really read those documents or comprehend what they say. Here's an idea. Don't vote for anyone who calls the US a 'Democracy". It's a clear indication that they have no clue.

16 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
if you in the media would hold the democrat house and senates feet to the same fire as they did the republican congress things would change .

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:56 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
I hope nancy and her buddies read this and take it to heart. their total disreguard for this nation and the people's best interest is treason, plain and simple. Who are the morons putting these people in office!

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:53 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Steve said:
Health insurance provided by an employer isn't a "gift". Its part of the compensation for doing your job. Health insurance isn't a right guaranteed by the Constitution or anything else. People that complain about having to pay for their own health care are bitching because it takes away the money they need for that new car they have to have every two years...Be responsible for your own life, and take personal responsibility instead of relying on other people to pay your way.

24 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
One of her worst articles - lack of facts. Repubs controlled Congress for 6 of 8 years and Bush vetoed all bipartisan bills. Bush is the problem and trying to tar Pelosi doesn't pass the idiot test.

0 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:19 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
Issues critical to Americans: Remedy 37 million American children living in poverty??? You need to check your facts about children in poverty. I think your number is closer to the total number of people in the US in 'poverty'. Children: 12- 13 million. Still a lot, but remember, the poverty statistics don't include non-cash assistance... like foodstamps. Check www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:53 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
Pelosi and co said give us control of congress and we'll "CHANGE" the direction of America. They got it and they delivered. Oil prices have "CHANGED" to double. Grocery prices have "CHANGED" to 100 bucks more per month. Job expansion that set a record after dims lost ALL power, "CHANGED" to losing again. Is everyone happy with the "CHANGE" that dims have given us? I cant afford anymore of the kind of "CHANGE" we've seen since dims got the congress back.

33 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:24 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
In Oct. 2006 Pelosi declared Bush's impeachment "off the table" - despite her oath to "...protect the Constitution...and bear true faith and allegiance to the same." Bush continues to flout both the Constitution and Congress' oversight role. Meanwhile Pelosi offers only excuses on these issues critical to Americans: * Strengthen the economy; reverse burgeoning budget deficits and trade imbalance * Reverse Bush's failed tax policy - skewed to benefit the wealthiest * End the Iraq war; hold Bush accountable for its failures and horrendous costs * Provide health care for 49 million uninsured Americans * Remedy 37 million American children living in poverty Institute a viable long-range energy policy * Effectively address climate change * Protect constitutional rights; reinstate justice and the rule of law * Reassert legitimate balance of powers Americans need and deserve changes in both presidential and congressional leadership.

2 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:08 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Pelosi & Co. enabled Bush’s failures"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree that Peloosi and Co. are total failures but I don't agree with the logic in this story.It would have created mass hysteria in the country if the FISA spying had been opened to the courts and would have done serious damage to our intelligence gathering. To begin with it was congress's failure to update the 1976 law to include modern technology.We're way past the era of land line phone taps.How do you get a FISA Court judge to give you a warrant for listening to a sattelite or cell phone? While there probably were abuses it was because the data collectors were doing go arounds of outdated laws.The Dems in congress didn't want to end the war for two simple reasons. Number 1 a lot of their own interests are heavily invested in military related enterprises and number 2 they need the war for fund raising.Obama's fund raising was in the tank in June until he came out forcefully for a timeline then they hauled $25 million in one day.It's the anti-war crowd that's funding Obama.

10 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:37 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Quin Hillyer: A modest proposal for judicial nominees"

Glenn Sugameli, Earthjustice said:
UPDATE: Now that the headline has been fixed: Quin Hillyer's July 18 column includes a major scoop: West Virginia left the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (he claims there are only four states MD, VA, NC and SC). If anyone can figure out when or how this occurred please let me (and the court) know. Or perhaps Mr. Hillyer is mired in an antebellum mindset and never accepted the fact that West Virginia is no longer part of Virginia. Mr. Hillyer also omits the context. The Senate has confirmed over 300 Bush judges and the vacancy rate is 4.7% As Sen. Leahy explained “Since the years in which Republicans pocket filibustered more than 60 of President Clinton’s moderate and qualified judicial nominees and judicial vacancies topped 100, we have cut judicial vacancies by more than half and we reduced circuit court vacancies by almost three-fourths, to 9 throughout the entire country from a high point of 32.”

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:58 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Quin Hillyer: Alabama case could nullify state courts"

Glenn Sugameli, Earthjustice said:
If anyone can figure out what the headline "Alabama case could nullify state courts" has to do with Quin Hillyer's July 18 column, or when West Virginia left the 4th Circuit (he claims there are only four states MD, VA, NC and SC), please let me know. Or perhaps Quin Hillyer is mired in an antebellum mindset and never accepted the fact that West Virginia is no longer part of Virginia.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:35 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Quin Hillyer: Alabama case could nullify state courts"

Glenn Sugameli, Earthjustice said:
If anyone can figure out what the headline "Alabama case could nullify state courts" has to do with Quin Hillyer's July 18 column, or when West Virginia left the 4th Circuit (he claims there are only four states , please let me know). Or perhaps Quin Hillyer is mired in an antebellum mindset and never accepted the fact that West Virginia is no longer part of Virginia.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:44 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Marc Danzinger: Are you ‘right’ to own a gun?"

NRA Life Member said:
This is a great article on gun ownership for the prospective n00b. Rule # 1 is safety. Get training,etc. Regarding who "should" have a gun...one rule I have figured out from taking friends to the shooting range, is that if their #1 favorite thing about shooting was "the feeling of power", then that person is not a person who should own a gun. It's characteristic of an unhealthy attitude of firearms, probably gotten from popular media & is an important consideration in my book. If you're a prospective gun n00b, please ask yourself about your shooting experience & why you liked it and/or or why you want a gun. If that's your topmost answer, please reconsider why you want it.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:55 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Marc Danzinger: Are you ‘right’ to own a gun?"

Examiner Reader said:
If you feel you have to or are required to keep a gun in a safe it's no good for protection ,leave it in the store for someone else to worry about.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:37 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Marc Danzinger: Are you ‘right’ to own a gun?"

Old Hunter said:
Wow, aren't you haughty. Some of us learned to use firearms as kids wandering around the woods with them before you were ever born. So don't sound so damned condescending.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Chris Stirewalt: Bad hand for poker-faced Obama"

Reader Cody said:
Chris Stirewalt is a fantastic addition to this newspaper. He's a handsome writer indeed.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:31 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Mary Katharine Ham: Some pols just can’t take a joke"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms Ham Your comments on the Obama cartoon don't add anything to the alredy saturated topic. But I must say you look positively hot on that page today. Reagrds

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:52 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Gay marriage not physically possible"

Examiner Reader said:
Greetings: I could not find the section to comment about the 'Taboo truths.." article wrotten by Ms. Scarborough, but right on. I agree with her and urge all americans to carefully read what she said about England and the Muslim matter. It will come here soon so read up and THINK about what is being said here. Its not just a matter of equality - its a matter of the american way of life and soon a crafty lawyer will sneak that into the system and voila - the Sharia Law exist here. Is this what we want? Wake up America, Wake Up.!!!

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:32 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

Son of an unemployed mother said:
Melanie stated, "If you don’t have health insurance because you’re unemployed, then get a job." I'll be sure to tell my lung-damaged mother about that, since she's been looking for work in a suitable breathing environment for the past 3 years. If you know anyone who's willing to let her work from home, I'll pass that information along.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:52 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

David Henson said:
There are many who will indeed dismiss your situation by saying "Life isn't fair," but my previous observation bears repeating, regardless of one's view of the role of government: Only in America will a person pay $3,324 a year (and rising annually) for no routine care, no prescription drug coverage, and a deductible of $1,750. No other civilized, industrialized nation on earth would tolerate such a thing. Funny how the only people who defend this situation are the ones who have employer-provided, government-subsidized health coverage.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:13 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

sue robinson said:
Interesting. But, a clarification: Health insurance purchased by individuals varies state by state because of required coverage add-ons. No, individuals may Not buy it across state lines. I pay $277 a month for a $1750 deductible, no prescription drug, no routine care "individual" policy. But, my state - Washington - requires me to have coverage for massage therapy and acupuncture among 47 other add-ons lawmakers gave to $pecial intere$t group$. And, Insurers can deny coverage here to anyone who has ever been sick or may become sick. Meanwhile, I subsidize everyone who has employer-provided health insurance because it is tax free, a tax break that now is a $190 billion per year national tax expenditure - the largest tax expenditure in the federal budget. Also, organ transplants are not available anywhere to people without drug coverage - or without insurance - unless they can put up a minimum $100,000 cash deposit. And no, I am not an organ donor anymore. Life isn't fair, is it.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:20 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

David Henson said:
No one is denied access? True, there's always the 8-hour wait at the emergency room of your local hospital...but if you experience a catastrophic illness or accident without health insurance, which you are denied due to a pre-exisiting condition, the hospital will go after your house, your savings accounts, and your future earnings to pay for it...even if it bankrupts you. Only in America. No other industrialized nation in the world would allow such a thing.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:15 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

Examiner Reader said:
How refreshing to read an article that states unabashed truths. Melanie Scarborough is certainly worth reading. We have the best medical people in the world with more research and advancements than any country. The truth is, nobody is denied access. Taxpayers do take up the slack even paying for the care of people that are not citizens of this great country.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:12 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

David Henson said:
If you're self-employed or your employer does not provide health insurance...and you have a disqualifying pre-existing condition...you are simply out of luck, period. All the self-reliance and personal responsibility in the world won't change that fact. Believe it or not, there are those who say government should not do anything to help those individuals.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:57 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

Laura said:
The health insurance I've gotten through my employers had no pre-existing condition clauses - in other words, they pay for everything, regardless of whether it was pre-existing. I'm sure that's not the case for everyone, but it's not true that *no one* will insure you if you have pre-existing conditions.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:50 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

David Henson said:
All the "self-reliance" and "personal responsiblity" in the world won't get you health insurance if you have certain pre-existing conditions. Too bad for those folks, eh? Who could've imagined that in the great U. S. of A a citizen faces the constant threat of bankruptcy and financial ruin simply because no insurance company will accept him, regardless of his ability to pay for insurance.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

Dr. Palmer said:
There is everything right about for profit health care. Costs only increase as government becomes more involved. There is no "pool" of resources. We are not in this together. My bills are my bills and I do not want you pay them and I will not pay yours.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:05 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

Steven Cernoch said:
Dear Mrs. Scarborough, No matter how much you or anyone else be they liberal or conservative espouses about self-reliance and personal responsibility they will never be traditional values so long as no one takes action against those would blame everyone but themselves for the problems plaguing this country. You for instance are right now a part of the largest problem that plagues this country: ignorance. Ignorance toward the issues in favor of partisan preaching and an abuse of your journalistic power, so please allow me to address your 5 taboo “truths” that the two main candidates should ignore. 1. Our current health insurance program is a for-profit system and anyone and everyone who pays into it weekly or bi-weekly from their paycheck is paying into a pool just as one would in a National Health Insurance plan. The major difference here being that when paying into that pool that pays for everyone else’s insurance in our current plan, they dole out the least money possible to ta

3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 14, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: The taboo truths Obama and McCain must ignore to become president"

UNC-G Grad said:
i'd hazard a bet that waaaaayyyy more has been spent/is being spent on a winless, pointless war than that which is being spent toward welfare mothers, who have hair weaves & pedicures. This is classic Reagan-era image conjuring with verisimilitude to that of the Republican-Bush gay marriage fear mongering. What we have in this story is a lot of gut-based, BAD conjecture.

3 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:45 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: When the baby hates the beach"

Examiner Reader said:
Megan Cox Gurdon did it again! OUR family just returned from a week-long vacation at Chesapeake Bay and it was only on the final day that our toddler decided that he loved the ocean. Despite two siblings and three adults' attempts for him to get his toesies wet, he resisted. Our final hour on our final day brought about a sea change (yep, pun intended). Sigh...

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:02 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008 re: "Chris Stirewalt: Obama’s tough talk stops at the Iranian border"

Tom Skypek, hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org said:
Mr. Stirewalt's commentary is spot-on. Iran is a problem that the next presidential administration will be forced to confront. The U.S. needs a president who, as Sen. Clinton said, is ready to lead on day one. It's pretty clear that Sen. McCain is that leader. Sen. Obama's inability to nail down a foreign policy position and stick with it is troubling.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:11 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Food extremists blinded by ideology"

Examiner Reader said:
Ambrose is victimized by a life-time of brainwashing on western diet and food production. Like his usual ignorant ramblings, he says that irradiation has "negligible consequence to taste or nutrition" without the relevant facts to inform his opinion. As with most americans, likely he eats processed foods that he cooks in a microwave and considers it a victory of science and american ingenuity. To further his biased arguments, he's selectively overlooking the very negative effects of the western diet and that americans are some of the least healthy persons on the planet. And he boasts that more of the same strategies are a scientific triumph when all affords is production of increasingly nutritionally negligible foodstuffs in poor conditions. Irradiation is the new panacea to cover for their unregulated practices. Similar arguments were waged against protests against agribusiness spraying antibiotics, which is still used today. But it no longer works because practices only got worse.

11 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:55 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Food extremists blinded by ideology"

Examiner Reader said:
Irony Alert: Ideological blindness in a column ostensibly about ideological blindness Could Mr. Armbrose please reign in his blinding ideological bloodlust long enough to get to the point of his columns, without burying two paragraphs of useful, verifiable information under multiple paragraphs of venting? Maybe retired English teacher (and fellow Examiner columnist) Erica Jacobs can reteach him about the importance of focusing an essay. Maybe there is a scientific consensus on the benefits of irradiating food. Maybe the science is irrefutable, and easily conveyed to the public. Those important observations got less column space than his broadsides against health care reformers and anti-capitialists, based almost entirely on a poorly phrased statement by Joan Claybrook. On a side note, I would love to read another Amborse take on Global Warming, which would elude geoscientific considerations, in favor of smashing Al Gore.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:53 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Time Machine: Tim Russert's first week in heaven"

Examiner Reader said:
I wonder if he got the chance to see all the babies who were part of the pro choice movement, that he was so in favor of?

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:11 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Watching fireworks from the national holding pen"

Examiner Reader said:
It's gone beyond just 'Watching fireworks from the national holding pen'. The US has been defeated by Ossama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda - productivity/efficiency across America has plummeted (to the point of loan officers approving any loan in sight during 2005?-2007) and billions of dollars has been channeled into security. And Government Commissioners, Administrators, Executive Directors and plain ol' bureaucrats are inured (or accustomed) to protecting or expanding 'their' jobs and 'their' turf while the taxpayer suffers and Bin Laden rejoices.

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
<