
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - When WTOP radio reporter Mark Seagraves asked Gov. Tim Kaine yesterday if the Dulles Rail project is dead, Virginia's chief executive confidently responded that “it is not.” He acknowledged, however, that “we got some troubling news from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), concerns about funding and some other concerns, but we feel like we can answer them, particularly the funding.” But as important as funding is, those “other concerns” represent a much bigger problem: The Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority (MWAA), which is managing the Dulles Rail project, has yet to address a lengthy list of design and technical problems that Metro says must be fixed before it will accept the finished 23-mile rail extension. Of greater concern, Metro warns that once the project “is in final design, it may be too late to start resolving these issues.” So even if money poured from the heavens, the Dulles Rail project could be orphaned at birth and then cost billions more to make it acceptable to Metro for adoption.
As William Flook reports in today’s Examiner, John D. Thomas, director of Metro's major capital projects warned Dulles Rail project director Charles “Sam” Carnaggio in a Jan. 16 letter that MWAA’s failure to address dozens of technical problems — many dealing with power sources at the heart of the project — suggests “that MWAA is not interested in [their] timely resolution.” Kaine knew about this serious intra-agency dispute because FTA Administrator James Simpson described it in a Jan. 24 letter, saying federal officials are “concerned about potential conflicts between MWAA, as the sponsor and constructor, and [Metro], as the ultimate owner-operator and the authority on technical standards for the project.” Simpson warned Kaine that FTA has previously seen firsthand how such conflicts in other transit projects — i.e., Boston’s Big Dig — increase “risks of cost escalation and schedule delays.” Kaine’s failure to tell WTOP’s large listening audience about this problem is yet another example of the official double talk that has characterized the Dulles Rail project from the beginning.
Fairfax County Supervisor Gerald Connolly has contributed his share of double talk. It’s clearly time to take another look at bus rapid transit (BRT). But Connolly disingenuously said Monday that BRT has been “looked at thoroughly.” Actually, Fairfax County was eligible for a federal New Starts demonstration BRT project in 1999 that would have paid 90 percent of the cost of extending BRT from the West Falls Church Metro station to Dulles Airport. But special interests in Tysons Corner and their friends in state and local government hijacked that effort and morphed it into Dulles Rail. Had they accepted federal funding then, passengers would be riding BRT to and from the airport today.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
3:17 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Memo to Obama: Don’t bring Chicago to office"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Memo to Obama: Don’t bring Chicago to office"
Report as inappropriate
1:57 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "We still hold these truths"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "On raising taxes, Obama has a European accent"
Report as inappropriate
10:07 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008
re: "Time for new hearings on dirty trial lawyers"
Report as inappropriate
10:58 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Keeping the lights on"
Report as inappropriate
9:39 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Keeping the lights on"
Report as inappropriate
9:04 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Chill out on global warming"
Report as inappropriate
5:45 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Chill out on global warming"
Report as inappropriate
8:05 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
3:03 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008
re: "Davis-Bacon is more pork for unions"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
1:09 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
12:21 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
10:30 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
7:09 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
10:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
8:55 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "A stark choice on gas prices"
Report as inappropriate
10:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "Opposing a fine judicial nominee as too qualified"
Report as inappropriate
7:15 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008
re: "Milberg settlement should be only the beginning"
Report as inappropriate
11:51 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "A hapless rehearsal of future emergencies"
Report as inappropriate
8:18 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "A hapless rehearsal of future emergencies"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "A hapless rehearsal of future emergencies"
Report as inappropriate
9:14 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Drill here, drill now"
Report as inappropriate
5:41 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Opposing a fine judicial nominee as too qualified"
Report as inappropriate
12:46 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "Opposing a fine judicial nominee as too qualified"
Report as inappropriate
2:42 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008
re: "Drill here, drill now"
Report as inappropriate
10:00 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008
re: "Drill here, drill now"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008
re: "Drill here, drill now"
Report as inappropriate
10:57 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008
re: "Bus Rapid Transit makes more sense"
Report as inappropriate
7:08 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008
re: "U.S. needs more oil drilling, not higher energy taxes"
Report as inappropriate
3:48 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008
re: "Chill out on global warming"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008
re: "Bus Rapid Transit makes more sense"
Report as inappropriate
7:32 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008
re: "Unions should stop tithing nonmembers with ‘fees’"
Report as inappropriate
4:46 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008
re: "Bus Rapid Transit makes more sense"
Report as inappropriate
3:53 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008
re: "Bus Rapid Transit makes more sense"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008
re: "Unions should stop tithing nonmembers with ‘fees’"
Report as inappropriate
10:57 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "Judging Obama by the company he keeps"
Report as inappropriate
5:56 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008
re: "Judging Obama by the company he keeps"
Report as inappropriate
11:36 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008
re: "Judging Obama by the company he keeps"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 2, 2008
re: "Judging Obama by the company he keeps"
Report as inappropriate
9:36 AM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008
re: "Give surplus buildings to charter schools"
Report as inappropriate
1:27 PM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008
re: "Chill out on global warming"
Report as inappropriate
1:19 PM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008
re: "Pigs in the trough on Capitol Hill"
Not(!) Oleo-esker said:
Michael Bodaken: does your comment change in any way the facts regarding Chicago's graft-ridden public trough for connected "developers" and their shoddy, unaccountable work under gov't. subsidies? The same shame exists in Baltimore's public housing system (30,000+ boarded up properties), as well as most east/northeast urban areas under the monopolistic control of democrat administrations. Push some statistics on that front, as you seem to have the ability to access facts on those fronts, too.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Your editorial “Memo to Obama: Don’t Bring Chicago to Office” does a disservice to your readers by suggesting that privately owned, federally subsidized, affordable multifamily housing is a failure. In fact, the following is an accurate statement of this unique nationwide housing resource: Federally assisted, multifamily housing consists of more than 1.3 million apartments nationwide. Over 50% of those living in this housing are elderly. The average size of any given property is approximately 110 apartments quite unlike the buildings cited in the article. The properties cited in your editorial are in no way representative of subsidized housing across the U.S. Most important, the vast majority of these apartments are soundly managed and owned. According to the Bush Administration’s proposed budget for next year, 94% of assisted and insured privately owned multifamily properties meet HUD’s physical standards, and 99% meet HUD’s financial management standards. Michael Bodaken
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
James said:
As long as our Royals are allowed to fill up all of the Family Stretch SUVs at the Company Pump, they are not interested in the Price Of Gasoline.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Considering that our current, unregulated economy is crashing, due to the unbridled avarice of the ownership class. That's pure capitolism at work. Everyone but the wealthiest are mired in economic quicksand and the government is being run into the ground by people whose ideology dictates that any governmental role is bad - creating a self-fulfilling and fiscally fatal prophesy. If you add under-employment to the booming unemployment rolls, the number of families making a living is pitifully low. We can't fall into the trap of red-baiting a real solution, because it raises taxes. taxes are for the benefit of "we", while all the protesting is coming from the "me" people. part of a unity message is economic justice, which means the well-off will need to be tapped, in an effort to keep more "boats afloat". Otherwise, there will be no more American to buy the non-necassities American business likes to produce and market.
2 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How much longer should the public wait? Try forever as long as Democrats are in charge. There is no way they are going to investigate the Culture of Greed and Corruption of their largest donor base, the trial bar.
9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's not be too hasty here. If the power goes down, then the Federal government parasites will not be able to "work", thereby lessening the damage they can do to the rest of us. Hmmm, this may be a good idea.
10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
An "inexplicable unwillingness?" Lemme 'splain it to you. The folks who live along that 300 mile corridor are unwilling to see huge towers and transmission lines go up across their farms and mountains. And they're certainly unwilling to see more demand placed on dirty coal plants in Ohio that are the primary source of their air pollution. If you damn city people want more power, build yourselves a nuke plant or look into some wind farms off the Maryland coast. Quit your crying and puling and try some self sufficiency for once. Maybe reevaluate your decision to build ridiculously large houses at increasing distances from your place of employment for the last couple decades, make some lifestyle changes in favor of conservation. Whatever you do, leave the remaining rural areas surrounding you alone. You've made your bed-lie in it!
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Lies, Damned Lies, and Demographics said:
Clarifying 2 statements: "average land temperature of the globe dropped precipitously last year... more than enough to “wipe out most of the global warming of the past 100 years,” " and "The severity of this global temperature drop was reflected in the fact the average U.S. temperature in January was lower than the average for the previous century"... one-year blips and anomalies do not disprove a trend. I fail to see how a yearly data point wipes out the other 100 yearly data points. Nor do I see how one country's below-average temperature for one month of one year (U.S., in Jan 2007) challenges the average annual temperatures WORLDWIDE for the other 11 months of the year, for the past 100 years. Very superficial analysis on your part, and it's disturbing to think that it's being swallowed by some of the commenters. I take it they aren't very observant geoscientists.
12 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for illuminating some of the huge holes in the global warming theory. This folly has influenced energy policy and provided incentive for speculators. Global warming theories are a driver in energy cost increases. Their validity, or lack there of, and influence on energy prices need to become heavily investigated and reported.
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i spent over thirty years as did many members of my family serving this country to keep communism from bringing it down now these two are showing their true colors and they should be kicked out of our government. shades of hugo chaves
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tom said:
This is the United States, correct? Fifty states united into one country. So, how is it wrong for individuals to unite, to form unions, to protect their rights and advance themselves economically? Businesses do so by forming trade organizations and chambers of commerce. And how about pharmacists? Why should you need a degree and a big salary to move a bottle of pills from a shelf to a counter? Or librarians. Is an advanced degree and big salary necessary to put books in order on a shelf? The wages paid to those people are a waste of money. Yet trained and often licensed union workers are somehow overpaid? Who do you want building your new bridge, an experienced construction hand or a college professor?
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Selma, said:
A greedy man stirs up dissension, but he who trusts in the LORD JESUS will prosper. He who trusts in himself is a fool, but he who gives to the poor will lak nothing, but he who closes his eyes to them receives many curses. (Proverbs 28: 25-27) May God touch your heart to change your mind and give you humble heart and mercy. In the Holy Name a bove all the names JESUS CHRIST amen Be wise and mercy to live in peace.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
God Holy Spirit said:
Just I will say selfish people, only they thinking a bout me and how to control human. But they forgatten there is God Father watch them what they do? How much will take with you money where you are die? Think about!! let people live in peace... Time is come FOR MERCY because LORD JESUS, He is the controler the world not YOU!!
11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Guy Warner, Ph.D. said:
It is incisive, accurately dissecting Democrat stategy to take control of America's energy. Is it socialism, or worse!
12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i think the government needs to quit being stupid and come up with some way to get the gas prices down.the only thing they wont is what they wont they dont care about the people wont there the ones that are makeing the money not the people
13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Most times when I read the news these days I wonder what happened to "A Government for the people "BY" the people". Growing up I learned our country was a Republic, I'm curious when we came a Socialist/Communist Society, where people want a Nanny government directing their lives.
13 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The government should not intrude in our lives, but corporations can. Corporations can jack the price of gas at their discretion thus invading my life, but the government cannot intrude to bring prices down. Your reasoning abilities are on par with a toad. If the government should not intrude, then why are you not complaining about the government spying on you, snatching your money for a useless war, handing money out to predatory banks, or allowing our media to be owned by one group of people.
12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hinchley and Waters should educate themselves and learn about supply and demand before embarrassing themselves on their ignorance of how things work
14 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think the government, is running enough and to Mr.Hinchly, and Ms.Waters. If they had there way they would be trying to tell the US citizens, when to change their underwear. I think they are for theirselves, and no one else, and they supposed to be working for the American citizens. The should remember we the taxpayer is paying them a salary, that is worth more, than they are to our country.
12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Glenn Sugameli, Earthjustice said:
The Examiner has STILL not made corrections to my published letter on this editorial I explained in my June 18 email: "Your edits are fine except for a major typo and an edit that changes the meaning of what I wrote. First, I wrote "yet President Bush won’t discuss other nominees opposed by home-state Senators." The published version substituted "supported " for "opposed," which flips the meaning of what I wrote, i.e., that Bush withdrew a Virginia 4th Circuit nominee opposed by Virginia's senators, but won't even discuss Rosenstein and other nominees who are opposed by home-state senators. Second, my submitted letter referred to "Maryland’s two senators" who had publicly said Rosenstein lacked requisite deep roots in Maryland’s legal community." The only senators mentioned in the published version are those from Virginia- so the sentence should begin "Maryland's two senators had publicly etc." Please make these corrections" Glenn Sugameli Earthjustice
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Richard McEnroe said:
Do you seriously expect CONGRESS to investigate trial lawyers?
13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"At the heart of the problem are sluggish responses from public officials and an alert system that can be all but paralyzed by indecision and inaction." Fix that first or every effort is worthless. As proven during Katrina.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
sluggish response: isnt that on the first page of the civil service employees manual. i say they were just going by "the book". so whats the big deal?
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It makes no sense that such a great nation should centralize all of its Federal Agencies in one geographical areas, and the recent power outage illustrates this very well. Like any robust system or effective organization, the Federal Governments should distribute its operations to those areas in which they are most active. BLM should locate its HQ out west; DOD should locate in the South; Treasury in New York and other large commercial cities. The secretaries of these organizations could open the location of these agencies to competition by the various regions. Of course, this will never happen.
11 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You should post link for www.drillnow.net website created by a Knoxville teen 19yo inspiring other to become pro-active in government. Might even make a great story
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well heck, this story doesn't surprise me at all given we've increasingly discovered that intelligence, wisdom, high ethical standards, and respect for the law are no longer barriers to lengthy, and quite lucrative, careers in the Senate. Shucks, I guess we shouldn't be too hard on Mikulski and Cardin: we'd probably hold back Mr. Rosenstein too if we were mediocre party hacks...and knew it.
9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
That person saying that non-union workers don't have to join the union is wrong.A closed shop means working for that union/company makes you a union member as a job requirement to employment.The only way to notpay union dues is to drop out of the union before it becomes a closed shop.I was out on strike for 7 months to have the CWA union get it's closed shop in New York
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree with this article and feel all the elected officials have let down the people of this country, with their BS..Not standing up to the radical environmentalist and making better decissions in the publics interest. The big 3 oil companies are also to blame by not using their billions of dollars of profits to also fight these radical environmentalists!!! It's just deplorable the way congress has mishandled this, they should have started investigating long before we got to this point. We've GOT to start drilling for new oil or uncap the wells that are already drilled. I can't and I know my fellow citizens can't continue to pay these prices. And to allow or watch a foriegn country such as China to drill where we should be drilling is ludicrous!!!!!!!
15 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Current high oil prices aren't so bad if the alternative is Metro- especially the Buses! I rode yesterday on a bus where a woman kept an open shopping cart that was a hazard to navigation throughout the trip and the driver never challenged her! In general, Open Carts, Open stroller, homeless people dradding out numerous large and full bags are far too !!! common on Metro. As are people eating on the buses, screaming into a cellphones and just truly inpleasant conditions. I saw a very large woman fit her self into a seat opening FAR too small for her, again on yesterday's trip, causing a quioet and taken aback young lady get pinned against the wall of the seat. 4.00 a gallon gas may be something we have done to ourselves but riding on buses that seem to be the transportation system of Dante's Inferno are harly the penance we should impose upon ourselves as we cope with the current circumstances!
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Have you lost your mind? ALL petrol is finite and will RUN OUT someday - quit postponing the inevitable and support finding alternatives. I can't believe you've achieved you position with short sighted views like this.
9 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
This Guy is a Joke said:
This writer doesn't know what he's talking about. BRT can not accommodate the number of passengers that rail can. It will never will be able to no matter what. You'd need 300 buses to accommodate the 85,700 passengers that the Silver line will carry where they'll only need 20 trains. Where did you get your information from anyhow? BRT will carry 10 million new daily riders ahah yea right. There barely isn't even that many people living in the DC area. The Heritage Foundation is a libertarian biased website that doesn't look at the facts. BRT costs more to operate than trains, especially with diesel prices through the roof. Check any transit agency that operates rail and bus and ask them which is cheaper to operate. They'll say that rail is half the price to operate. Over a course of 30 years, rail will be much less expensive. Keep on using the Heritage Foundation as a source though, a website that supports privatized police forces and removing the FDA has all the ans
12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Kay Mazzetta said:
I am a Barack Obama supporter. I would like our next President of the United States to consider DRILLING off shore for oil. We Americans NEED to be more self-supportive and need to drill for oil off the shores of the United States.
11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The green agenda has a yearly multibillion dollar budget to promote its propaganda on global warming based on faulty computer modeling only. Many scientist who use to believe in and promote global warming are now deniers as they see the mistakes they have made supporting the global warming data. Of course Al Gore now gets $100,000 dollar per speach as he jets around the country. His company Generation Investment Management has already pulled in over 6Billion dollars as he sells more carbon credits. Within a few years, once people feel a colder world due to decreased solar output, they will realize the Global Warming is the biggest scam of the 21st century. The global warming agenda perverts real science as amost all of their propaganda does not follow the scientific method and puts down any critique.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The BRT lines have been in service in D.C. since the '80s. From Potomac Ave., it was hard getting a bus that did not stop prior to Fairfax Village. In today's world at the Rhode Island Ave. metro stop of the 5 lines that pick up riders from the station and head off into Maryland, there are only 2 lines that will load/discharge riders in D.C. What is appalling is the fact that Metro workers do not pay a penny towards transportation and riders on BRT routes only pay the 45 cents to transfer and not the higher rates they are suppose too. Riders in D.C./MD/VA are providing corporate welfare to WMATA, and the riders in D.C. are further subsidizing the trips for the Maryland riders. Don't forget Metrobuses frequently do not show up, how will the BRT's rememdy that?
8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Former Maine State Employee said:
As one of countless people involved in this Maine battle against the MSEA-SEIU, I am 100% certain that this particular union/PAC has billed inappropriate expenses into "chargeable" categories to inflate their figures. In fact, we have 1,500+ pages of evidence to prove it! This case is a great example of corruption within our state governments, as our current Governor (John Baldacci) has had direct involvement in this case of forced unionism with little/no detailed accountability on the union's part. Needless to say, I believe the Daniel Locke v. Edward Karass case deserves to go before the U.S. Supreme Court. It's time for union's like MSEA-SEIU to be held accountable for the financial games they are playing with other people's hard-earned money. It's time for the truth to be exposed on a national level, as this is much more than just a Maine issue/problem.
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Anyone who cites The Heritage Foundation is already suspect.
11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Jesus christ you people are idiots. The WMATA says that the addition of all these BRT lines would add 10 million daily riders PER YEAR! Both the Silver Line and the Purple Line numbers you cite are a PER DAY numbers! Did you really think they were saying that an additional 5 million people would ride the buses EVERY DAY? Or, alternatively, did you really think that the new Silver Line was expected to serve only 115 people PER DAY? How incredibly stupid are you?
13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If non-union employees wish to refrain from joining a union in a "closed-shop" occupation, that is perfectly within their rights. They can then negotiate separately with their employers for wages, benefits, etc., all of which would have been done on their behalf by the union. Of course, they may wish to organize to do so.....which means forming a cabal, or "union" to provide broad benefits to their members. In short, sit down and shut up, and enjoy the benefits the union has brought you.
11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Barely About Barack said:
In other words, you aren't interested in the political actions of an ostensible President, but the gossipy nonsense that is barely fit for a Kitty Kelley book? The June 4's editorial section contains two notable analyses of Barack's political stances and Illinois voting record (one by Jay Ambrose, the other from Redstate). The man has a legislative history, and has made several public statements on issues of import. Don't settle for these table scraps about pastors when you can actually delve into the laws he supported or rejected when he was a State and National Senator.
13 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
To Barely About Barack- said:
The congressional record of Obama is pitifully small. Hardly a footnote. as for law review - Do you think we should try to get a look at his high school term papers too? I'm interested in his real life history of political activism as opposed to his "legal philosophy". His personal and political associations are on the record, because Obama put them on the record himself...very deliberately. They were instrumental in bolstering his image and in launching his early political career. Guilt by association is exactly what Obama is suffering from right now, and this would be because he hand picked those associates, upon whose ideologies he fashioned his own. The paper is in no way responsible for Obama's paltry congressional record or for his pathetic past attempts to ingratiate himself with the followers of Wright and Pfleger for political gain. Who is the real poser?
12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Barely About Barack said:
More lazy guilt by association, posing as genuine reporting. Why not study Barack's voting record in the Illinois and national legislature? Why not study his legal philosophy as editor of the Harvard Law Review? If you don't trust the judgment of politicians based on their long-term associations, why should I trust the judgment of a newspaper that won't research the published political record of a politician?
10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Obama a poor judge of character? said:
The old adage is still true- Actions speak louder than words. Obama, in his ambitious quest to make a name for himself in Chicago political circles was willing to "keep company" with people that today's mainstream voters find unsavory. His unwillingness to denounce these former associates appeared to be politically motivated too, based upon his fear of losing the support of black voters who might label him a turncoat who denies his church and the friends who helped establish his political base. We've all heard and admired Obama's impressive speaking ability, but the fact remains , Obama's actions, past and present, do speak louder and more truthfully than his words.We need to see more evidence of Obama's "change" of heart when it comes to divisive racial and political associations and friendships before we elect him to be our president and the leader of the free world.
14 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Cody Larsen said:
Until the feed pipe that runs between our increasingly corrupt politicians and the teacher's unions is cut, our nation's children will continue to under perform and often fail. Monopolies insure mediocrity and misery. Politicians don't send their children to public schools. Why should only the wealthy have access to quality education? "Allow" citizens of this country to have the choice of where they send their children to school. Create competition and breakup the corrupt government education monopolies. Then EVERYONE, including the poor, will have the opportunity to obtain a quality education which is the key to success. Certainly, this happening is unlikely. The teacher's unions are a major supporter of the Democratic party which exists only for the purpose of "representing" the victims they have created.
13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We now know wha caused the dust bowl days back in the 30's. It was the carbon emissions from all those planes, trains, and automobiles. And Fat Albert wasn't around to explain it to us.
12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A list of members of congress who are receiving subsidies needs to be listed. Grassley reportedly recieived a million dollars in subsidies. No wonder he likes the corn for ethanol subsidies. While meat producers are going bankrupt because of corn prices.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree