Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Prince William Del. Paul Nichols finds his opposition to high-occupancy toll lanes on Interstate 95 a lonely road in Richmond.

“I’m standing in front of a train going 60 miles an hour and trying to stop it,” said Nichols, D-Woodbridge. “It’s going to be very difficult, but I’m making noise.”

High-occupancy toll lanes, or HOT lanes, have won broad support in Northern Virginia, with its chronic problems trying to fund major transportation projects. Offering carpoolers fast, free lanes while also offering solo commuters the chance to pay a fee to access speedier lanes has made Nichols’ position unpopular.

The House Transportation Committee hasn’t held any hearings yet.

“HOT lanes expand reliable options for transportation,” Gov. Tim Kaine’s spokesman, Gordon Hickey, said Monday, noting the General Assembly directly authorized the type of public-private partnership that is set to build the new lane on the often-congested highway.

Nichols and other Prince William County critics fear the alternative will crush the popular “slug lines,” by which commuters pick up strangers so they can drive in the high-occupancy vehicle lanes.

“You got to remember that 65 percent of our people commute out of the county for jobs,” Prince William County Supervisor John Jenkins, D-Neabsco, said, and there is a concern commuters may be left home by drivers deciding to pay the fee instead of picking up strangers.

While the new lane could get commuters moving faster, those who use the slug lines are concerned that it will erode interest in park-and-ride lots as well.

dgenz@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:13 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "HOT lanes foes cite dangers to migratory birds"

Examiner Reader said:
(sarcasm) It's great that they are willing to only destroy the trees in the birds’ foraging space, and not the actual trees where they nest. I mean sure, now they'll have a place to sleep, they just won't have anything to eat. Absolutely lovely.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:12 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
Discrimination. Is VA really adding public roadways that only the rich could afford? Why are the rich the only ones entitled to a fast commute? Am I paying to build these lanes? If so I will be paying for a road that I can't even afford to ride on. Is that really public? Since when is it ok to segregate the population? Rich people over here! Talk about separate and unequal. This state disgusts me.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Aging bridges, ramps to be replaced as HOT lanes added"

Examiner Reader said:
And what happens when the "bill" for these lanes is paid off? I guess they'll continue to charge us like they do for the Dulles Toll Road. If the funds go to something productive (i.e. upkeep/upgrade of existings roads) that's fine...I just hope that's the case. I wish they had added the purple line back in the day when Metrorail was still being constructed. It would have been a lot cheaper then...

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
How about using that lane to make a metro line instead?

69 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.09 seconds)