Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“If you don’t make provisions for these things, they are not going to happen,” said Gregory Hamm, general manager of Columbia for General Growth Properties Inc., the major landowner in downtown Columbia in Howard.
This could mean concentrating development around a point that would be a transit hub, he said. With residents in place willing to ride the bus or Metro, Columbia would be poised for transit.
General Growth is finalizing a deal with a consultant to study transit opportunities, Hamm said at a meeting held by resident activist group Transportation Advocates.
Hamm said GGP would release the name of the consultant next week. The company is working on its plan for downtown redevelopment, which will include hiring consultants and meeting with resident groups.
The consultants will examine existing transit, such as Howard Transit, and future options, Hamm said.
The results of a transit study could affect the completed studies on the roads and traffic, and the county and company have conducted traffic studies. The county’s study was included in the final framework — titled “Downtown Columbia: A Community Vision” — released last month, which is intended to guide the development of downtown during the next 30 years.
If buses and pedestrian connections reduce the number of cars on the road, the traffic impact might have to be reviewed, Hamm said.
County officials are in the middle of a five-year review of the county’s bus system, which is required to receive state and federal funds for public transportation, said Marsha McLaughlin, director of Howard’s Department of Planning and Zoning.
They are working closely with the company and their consultants as they determine the transit needs, she added.
Sharon Smith, deputy transit administrator for operations for the Corridor Transit Corp., which manages the county’s bus system, said she expected more details from GGP on transit and transportation in Columbia.
“All of this is very timely. We were hoping we’d have more information,” Smith said after the meeting.
“I’m really anxious to see what they come up with.”
GGP officials will announce next week a series of community meetings, which will be held before the company’s plan for downtown redevelopment is released in response to the final framework, Hamm said.
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal"
Report as inappropriate
10:57 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008
re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"
Report as inappropriate
6:12 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008
re: "Funding unclear for Columbia downtown public transit plans"
Report as inappropriate
2:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008
re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"
Report as inappropriate
3:41 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008
re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"
Report as inappropriate
Lifelong Columbia Resident said:
It is always about the greed. They want to cash in on the older neighborhoods with larger lots. They can build a McMansion on Wilde Lake, or stuff 2-3 homes on a 1/3rd acre lot. It is all about which developer has enough grease for the squeeky wheels in the County Council. I've lived here my entire life and Columbia is turning into a sewer like Baltimore. Our "leaders" are out of touch with reality, they only have special interest in mind when they propose legislation. This not the Columbia vision we bought into in 1968, the elitists are running the show now. And public transportation is the last thing Columbia needs, we have enough problems without importing more. If people can't afford a car what can they buy at the Mall? Look at Owings Mills after the subway went in. Why don't the folks in the county council figure out how to curb crime? Or find productive things for our children to do instead of doing drugs and having babies. Stop filling your pocket with kickbacks and do your j
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I used to work for Howard Co., and believe me, the current bus routes aren't full by any means. Therefore, I don't believe there is a need for more public transportation, especially in a town with affluent residents who commute. But I'm sure Ulman would love to funnel money into this anyway.
6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Public transportation will not make Columbia Mall (downtown is a joke) more attractive. It will destroy the mall, just look up the road in Reisterstown. If GGP and Wells believe it is needed they are free to reach into their pockets to pay for it. They are not welcome to reach into mine.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
My vision for Columbia involves a qualified County Executive. Maybe one day Howard County will make that dream come true.
61 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ulman said he was going to block the tower in Columbia during his campaign. Then, he gets elected and does nothing. I can't trust this guy. His vision for Columbia likely panders to everyone, like he did to get elected.
51 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree