|
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Tests done Friday of the bottom of San Francisco Bay recovered no oil, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Monday.
The Corps of Engineers and the Dredge Material Management Office conducted the tests, which have been ongoing since the Cosco Busan container ship leaked 58,000 gallons of fuel into the Bay after crashing into a San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge tower.
Friday’s testing was meant to give more extensive results of the amount of possible oil in the dredging area within the Oakland Outer Harbor Channel.
Dredging gathers sediments that collect at the bottom of the Bay to widen and deepen the Bay and make the waters navigable for large ships, spokeswoman Maria Lee said.
Materials collected during dredging are often reused in areas such as wetlands and other ecologically sensitive areas, Lee said.
Making sure the materials are not contaminated is key, as dredging in contaminated areas could have ecological impacts on areas using the materials and on the Bay itself, Lee added.
Dredged materials are always tested before reuse, according to Lee, but the testing done Friday was more extensive because of the recent oil spill.
Oil-absorbent pompoms were dragged along the bottom of the Oakland Outer Harbor Channel twice Friday, and both tests were clear and did not find any oil, spokesman Joe Barison said.
The area is now considered safe for dredging, he said.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:11 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 12, 2008 re: "Mayor�s messaging after oil spill �private�"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 14, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan may be moved soon"
Report as inappropriate
12:42 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 13, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan may be moved soon"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
If its the public's business coming through a private device, why is it any less the public's business? The mayor is saving our tax dollars by not billing us for his cell phone and service? Right.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's a container vessel not a tanker. You wrote in the same article, "... allowing the tanker ship to relocate from the middle of the San Francisco Bay to a local shipyard ..." "The 900-foot container vessel has been anchored in the greasy waters of the San Francisco Bay since Wednesday,..."
110 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What use was pilot John Cota? Wasn't it his job to prevent such mishaps? I would hope he has been suspended until further investigations conclude.
85 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree