Multimedia News

Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...
Ski jumping at its finest
6 photos
Ski jumper Nicolas Mayer from France flies du...
Virginia Tech beats Cincinnati in Orange Bowl
6 photos
Virginia Tech's Darren Evans (32) celebrates ...

Bonds intends to keep legal team

Dec 22, 2007 3:00 AM (382 days ago) by David Smith, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Former Giants slugger Barry Bonds appeared in court Friday to tell a judge he wants to keep his attorneys, despite conflict-of-interest concerns.
(AP Photo/Tony Avelar)
Former Giants slugger Barry Bonds appeared in court Friday to tell a judge he wants to keep his attorneys, despite conflict-of-interest concerns.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Attorneys’ representation of clients in BALCO probe seen as potential cause of concern

By David Smith

Examiner Staff Writer

With the media crush of his arraignment behind him, Barry Bonds ventured back into court on short notice Friday with much less fanfare, to tell a judge that he wanted to keep three new attorneys despite the perception that they could have conflicts of interest should specific witnesses go to the stand during trial.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Bonds’ attorneys Allen Ruby, Cris Arguedas and Ted Cassman, who worked with Arguedas for previous clients, represented several individuals involved in the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative grand jury investigation, including Bonds’ former personal surgeon, Dr. Arthur Ting.

Federal prosecutors voiced concern that if the former clients of Bonds’ attorneys were called on to testify in the trial, then they, bound by attorney-client loyalties, would not cross-examine the witness as vigorously as needed.

That could leave any conviction open to appeal.

“The concern is that the prior representation may impact in some [manner] their representation of you,” said U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston, speaking to Bonds in court.

But Bonds, clad in a blue suit, more festive than the black suit he wore to his arraignment, answered “yes” and “yes, I do” to several of the judge’s questions confirming his understanding and intent to waive any conflicts of interest.

Court documents filed by federal prosecutors indicate that Ting, who was represented by Ruby, Bonds’ new lead counsel, for a month in 2005, is “likely to be a witness for the government” when the case against baseball’s most prolific home run hitter goes to trial as early as next fall.

Earlier this month, Bonds pleaded not guilty in federal court on one count of obstruction of justice and four charges that he lied to the grand jury in 2003, when he testified that he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs.

Arguedas, with Cassman accompanying her, represented former world-class U.S. sprinter Tim Montgomery and three professional football players, Chris Cooper, Chris Hetherington and Tyrone Wheatley during the BALCO investigation. In court documents, prosecutors indicated that they did not plan on calling these men to the stand, but they did not want any conflicts of interest to arise should the men testify.

Bonds did not take any questions from reporters, but Arguedas and Ruby maintained Bonds’ innocence and said their presence would not be a problem for Bonds.

“We have every expectation that both Allen and I will be in court fighting for Barry,” Arguedas said.

Written declarations from Ruby, Arguedas, Cassman and Bonds are due to the court Jan. 4, and a case status conference is set for Jan. 8. Bonds is not required to attend.

dsmith@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:26 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"

Examiner Reader said:
The so called fan seems to be doing to Barry exactly what they accuse him of having done. Tell the media to take a hike. And if your favorite player did that you'd be on the side of the media, right? I don't think so.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:24 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"

Discerner said:
Does the chickens coming home to roost saying seem right for the "king" The way he has treated people in the past is coming back to haunt him.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:54 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"

Examiner Reader said:
Personally, on an emotional level, I would love to see Bonds go to the Yankees this year. I am a big Red Sox fan and seeing Bonds in pin stripes would be a perfect fit, in my eyes. Then my opinion of the Yankees would be complete!

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:50 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, those sanctimonious fans who condemn Barry Bonds for alleged use of performance-enhacing drugs.Yup, They're the same ones who blame Eve for Man's downfaul, the same choir that sucks-up a Martini during lunch to drown out their disillusionment with their job, and the same adulters/adultresses who satiate themselves outside the trust of matrimony. What's the famous passage? Let he who has not sinned cast.... It was their hypocritical voice that force Giants' managment to exercise the stupidest decision in baseball - release Bonds. It was exciting with Bond on the team. He changed the dynamics of the game. Pitchers feared him. He put meat on the seats. Alas, it was the reason, whether to cheer or boo, to take in a game. What are Giants without Bonds? Lifeless. Boring - cameras spend more time on coaches and the bullpen than on the field. A team will pick-up Bonds, and his performance with the new team will put the Giants management to shame. Genius has to be tolerated.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:55 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"

Examiner Reader said:
Wasn't Dickey the guy who said Mike Montgomery would never sign with Cal? I suspect that no team, especially the Yankees, would soil themselves with Bonds' baggage. Some say he wore out last year because he had to play the outfield. Others say he's simply gotten old. I doubt, given that he's now a year older and has been away from competitive pitching, that he'll be horrible effective come the dog days of summer.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:22 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"

Examiner Reader said:
For the Examiner Reader who says, "Barry is a hero", well, if he was a hero, then he would not cheated himself to become one. He was already on a verge of success, and now this has tarnished his reputation. Barry is not a hero not like Babe Ruth, "Jolting Joe" Dimaggio, Roger Maris, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson and Hank Aaron, to name a few. Jackie Robinson is a true hero because he had to go through diversity to get to a game that would not allow blacks to play. He got a chance. Barry on the other hand got his chance but what has he taught the future generation of baseball fans? Do future generations think that cheating is a way to become a hero?

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:57 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 2, 2008 re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, seriously, who friggin cares?

29 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:14 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008 re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"

Knot2brite said:
Barry Bonds reminds me of, sorta like Hank Aaron on steroids.

28 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:08 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008 re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"

Examiner Reader said:
Why are they wasting so much govt. time and our tax-$$$ on this nonsense? Oh, that's right, Barry is the HOME-RUN KING and the single season HOME RUN KING! America always likes to try and destroy our heroes. They won't get away with it this time! Fight Barry, FIGHT BACK!

42 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:49 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007 re: "Bonds courtroom circus about to begin"

Knot2brite said:
It still surprises me that Barry Bonds was indicted. I thought for sure he was gonna walk.

41 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement