Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - In her most aggressive political move since being appointed in September, interim Supervisor Carmen Chu publicly demanded that several city departments come up with a specific plan to address her west side district’s homeless problem.
The District 4 supervisor is holding a community meeting Monday to address increasing complaints from her constituents that The City’s recent efforts to clear Golden Gate Park of homeless people has increased their numbers in the adjacent Sunset neighborhood.
Last week, Chu requested city departments, including the police and the Human Services Agency, to come up with a Sunset-specific plan to combat the homeless problem in time for the meeting.
Chu met with representatives of the city departments Wednesday.
“We spoke at length about some of the things they have been seeing, what resources we could potentially take a look at,” Chu said. “I feel good that I think that we are able to move in the right direction of getting some targeted services in areas where we know there is a presence.”
Problem areas have been identified “along the Great Highway, near the ocean, along Judah, along Irving, very close to the park, along Lincoln Way as well,” Chu said.
Chu said her request is also in response to the report last month of a German exchange student stabbed by a homeless man in the Outer Sunset.
It’s unclear whether there are actually more homeless in the Sunset, Chu said, adding that she is hearing that from residents and merchants.
Monday’s community meeting — at 7 p.m. at the Sunset Recreation Center — will include representatives from city departments, she said.
Chu took over as interim supervisor Sept. 25, appointed by Mayor Gavin Newsom after he suspended Supervisor Ed Jew from the seat and charged him with official misconduct. Chu previously worked in Newsom’s Budget Office.
Newsom responded to Chu’s concerns last week, saying, “There was a homeless problem in the Sunset before we stepped up enforcement in the park,” and adding that it was “naïve” to think that increased efforts in the park would not prompt some homeless to move to other locations.
Newsom said The City has budgeted for the hiring of additional homeless out reach workers, which would also focus on the west side.
According to the 2007 homeless count conducted in January, there are 6,248 homeless people in emergency shelters, hospitals, treatment centers and jail, as well as those on the street. Of those counted, 2,771 lived on the streets, with 70 counted in District 4, one of the three lowest totals of all 11 districts.



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:28 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007 re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
12:36 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
11:43 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
10:28 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
9:37 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
1:48 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
11:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
6:39 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007
re: "Chu says homeless in Sunset"
Report as inappropriate
Cratso said:
I'm merely pressing Sicko for the studies he cites as the basis for his arguments. That's called debate. Diligent studies lead to facts, facts lead to solutions. Kneejerk reactions, emotions and opinions do not. Below are links to the results of two studies, the first being a PDF file. I found that both help to diffirentiate the causes and the effects of homelessness. www.mayors.org/uscm/hungersurvey/2005/HH2005FINAL.pdf www.nationalhomeless.org/civilrights/lawrence/lawrence.html
53 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ms. Jackson said:
Cratso - skip the 'tude and advance a solution that has not already been advanced by someone of your "leadership qualities". Responding negatively to public "self satisfatcion", drunkeness, crack smoking, sidewalk sprawl, violence et al, is hardly a rant. It is a visceral response, which is not going to go away via the conduit of your meaningless yammering. Come up with something beyong the usual useless tripe that is repeated with each new influx of post adolescents, or back off, shut up, and let the majority of S.F.-ers decide.
48 agree | 48 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Chance Martin said:
Wow... are we speaking about the same SFPD officers who have somewhere between 2/3 to 3/4 of their homeless quality of life citations dismissed for misapplying the pertinent statutes who speak with such accuracy and authority about where homeless people come from? Kinda makes me wonder if those shiny laptops in their cruisers are where these nonsense anti-homeless screeds originate...
57 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Myself for Mayor said:
We don't need more studies to back up arguments, we need solutions to this problem. Just talk to any cop about the homeless and they will tell you that the majority come from other cities and states. This liberal area has a politically friendly attitude towards the homeless with this care not cash BS. We need politicians who are going to stand up and do something to help solve the problem instead of the status quo.
56 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Cratso said:
Dear Sick: Skip the rant and cite the studies to back up your argument.
37 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sickofrisco said:
Regarding the causes of homeless, numerous studies have shown that the primary causes of homelessness are mental illness and substance abuse, with considerable evidence showing that much of the former is a result of the latter. Studies examining correlations between the two suggest that the onset of mental illness tended to occur AFTER long-term substance abuse, not the other way around. In addition, the tendency of goo-goo liberals to romanticize/victimize homeless people obstructs any effort to compel these people to seek, or follow through on treatment for their mental illness. Much of this in SF has to do with the psychological makeup as well as the personal history of many older liberal residents here. Homelessness is a logical extension of the hippie ethos and lifestyle: "do your own thing", no sense of responsibility or accountability, blame The Man for your problems and fight any effort to make you clean up your own act as "repressive". The chickens have come home to roost...
55 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sickofrisco said:
Cratso: if you think these are SF residents, then tell us where they lived and worked in the city before they became homeless. If they were residents who became homeless through no fault of their own, do you think their local friends/family/co-workers in this oh-so-liberal town would let them wander the streets? You need to talk to some of these people some time, and read some of the articles where these people talk about how they came here. Fact of the matter is that places with "bum-friendly" policies such as SF, Berkeley, and Santa Cruz, have far more problems with homelessness that many more places with a far less affluent local populace. Homeless respond to the laws of economics just like everyone else - they gravitate to where it is easiest to live w/r/t their chosen (YES, chosen) lifestyle of indolence, irresponsibility, criminality and substance abuse.
44 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Cratso said:
Dear Sick: You seem to speak with such authority. What is the source of your data that "most of them came to SF AFTER they became homeless"? Also, how did they become homeless before they came here?
58 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sickofrisco said:
SF doesn't have a homeless problem because there aren't any solutions out there. Rather, this city has a homeless problem because of a lack of political will to take the hard, sometimes unpopular steps to deal with the situation. The vast majority of homeless people are NOT hard-working residents who just happened to fall on hard times. Most of them came to SF AFTER they became homeless thanks to all the free goodies and non-existent enforcement of panhandling, vagrancy, and litter laws. SF attracts bums and druggies like excrement attracts flies - and the treatment is just about the same: lock the lid, scrub the place down, and chase off loiterers, and the pests (and their accompanying stench) will go away...
39 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree