Sports Examiners bring you the local angle on your favorite teams:

Los Angeles Examiners

Colin Ward-Henninger
Los Angeles Lakers Examiner
Most Recent Post
Phil Jackson gets aggressive in loss
Des Martini
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Examiner
Most Recent Post
Hello CC Sabathia? Goodbye Jered Weaver?
 
 

Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Liotta: Is Rios really that exciting?

Dec 7, 2007 5:49 PM (361 days ago) by Tim Liotta, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Hey, Giants fans, even if you’ve heard of Alex Rios, have you ever cared about Alex Rios? Ever rushed to the morning paper to check a box score to see how Alex Rios did?

Didn’t think so.

Apparently, Alex Rios is all the Giants can get for a young pitcher who has the potential to be a No. 1 starter and is dirt cheap. That doesn’t sound like the kind of trade a successful major-league franchise makes these days.

Don’t get me wrong. Alex Rios is a nice player, but a team shouldn’t have to give up a talent such as Tim Lincecum in order to get Alex Rios. Teams are starving for pitching talent. Talented, young pitching that’s cheap is even better.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Which makes Lincecum a piece of solid baseball gold and there’s probably not another team in baseball that would even think about trading him. That’s because the other 29 teams have developed at least one major-league hitter with their minor-league system this millennium. Unfortunately, the 30th team in that group is the Giants.

The fact that the Giants are even considering this deal is an indictment on how poorly their minor-league system has served them. Damon Minor, Cody Ransom, Todd Linden, Jason Ellison — need I go on?

So the Giants are desperate. And desperate ain’t where you want to be when you want to make a trade.

These Giants have a lineup of has-beens and nice players on the downside of their career. Not an ounce of hope among ’em. Apparently, while everybody was watching Barry Bonds hit all those home runs, the Giants’ cupboard of hitting talent was going bare.

Which leaves this team staring at wasting two or three years of great outings from Matt Cain and Lincecum. That’s why they’re forced to consider Alex Rios and a deal that could come back to haunt them for the next 15 years.

There’s another thing going on here, too. The Giants are treating Lincecum like he is found money and that’s a mistake. They never expected to be able to draft him, but there he was, available for the 10th pick of the 2006 draft.

They never expected that Lincecum — after less than two seasons of professional baseball, after being named the Giants’ No. 1 prospect going into the 2007 season, after making 24 starts at the ripe ol’ age of 23 — would be as good as he’s been.

But do you know what’s the worst thing about all this? Even if the Giants make this horrendous deal and add Alex Rios to their roster, what then?

The Giants would have Rios batting third in a crummy lineup that would lose 90 games, and that’s not reason enough to part with a young pitcher with a boatload of potential.

Tim Liotta is a freelance journalist and regular contributor to The Examiner.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:26 PM MST on Sun., May. 11, 2008 re: "Giants’ Zito is trying, but that’s not enough"

Examiner Reader said:
Make up an injury? I'd make him clean the toilets at the ballpark 40 hours a week. At least the Giants would get something back for that ridiculous salary of his!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:37 PM MST on Sat., Dec. 22, 2007 re: "Liotta: It was little, but it could be big"

Examiner Reader said:
how much more do we need to hear Liotta's wrong comments? he was wrong about Baron Davis, and has been wrong too many times about the 49ers and Mike Nolan...it's getting lame....

114 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:18 AM MST on Sun., Dec. 9, 2007 re: "Liotta: Is Rios really that exciting?"

Stoeten in TO said:
Considering the debate I've heard, this is probably a fair trade. A lot of Toronto fans think it's crazy to give up Rios. The Jays don't run so his SB numbers don't reflect his true speed. In the NL he'll be a perennial 30-30 guy at least, and he hits for average, and has great range and a great arm. Maybe I'm too biased being in Toronto, but Rios to me looks like a perfect cornerstone hitter for an NL West franchise. Plus, he's one of the few Jays who was consistently getting clutch hits last year. Anyway, I'm just saying, don't base your interest in him on the fact that he got looked over in the US media being in Toronto. Trust me, people here weren't rushing out to read Lincecum box scores either.

122 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:29 PM MST on Sat., Dec. 8, 2007 re: "Liotta: Is Rios really that exciting?"

Examiner Reader said:
Well stated - but Lincecum is money in the bank #1 potential SP under control for 5 years are VERY rare. 25 HR-15 SB corner OF under control for 2-3 years are not as rare.

105 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:24 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 8, 2007 re: "Liotta: Is Rios really that exciting?"

SteveToronto said:
You guys and Sabean are out of your minds if you dont make this trade! Rios is a proven commodity at the age of 27. 2 time allstars whose numbers have improved everyyear over the last 4 years and are on the verge of super stardom dont grow on trees! 23 year old pitchers who are "supposed" to be stars one day come along to every organization at least once a year

104 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement