Examiner.com // 23 mins ago
Examiner.com // 48 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 5 mins ago
Quick Read | NBC 4 // 1 hr 47 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 57 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 58 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 29 mins ago
Examiner.com // 2 hrs 52 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 57 mins ago
Quick Read | Daily News // 2 hrs 58 mins ago
 
   
Va. House speaker has dim hopes for Metrorail extension to Dulles
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Virginia House Speaker William Howell, above, believes the 23-mile rail extension to Dulles Airport isn’t “going to take one person off the road.”
(Brig Cabe/Examiner)
Virginia House Speaker William Howell, above, believes the 23-mile rail extension to Dulles Airport isn’t “going to take one person off the road.”

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The 23-mile extension of Metrorail to Dulles costs too much, won’t cut traffic and will fail to carry as many riders as proponents claim, a top Virginia Republican legislator said Tuesday.

House Speaker William Howell, of Stafford, delivered a bleak assessment of the beleaguered rail project in an editorial board meeting with The Examiner, arguing Dulles rail is “not going to be the panacea they think it is.”

“It’s not going to take one person off the road,” Howell said.

Instead, the project may actually worsen traffic in Tysons Corner due to the increases in building density that officials will approve to accompany the line, he said.

Howell also echoed critics of Dulles Rail who argue the more than $5 billion price is far too expensive for the number of riders the line will serve. About 46,500 new riders will board the Metro extension each day by 2030, according to forecasts by the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which is managing the project.

“I think it’s incredibly expensive, I don’t think it’s going to be utilized to the point they think it is,” Howell said.

The speaker’s pessimism over the commonwealth’s largest transit project stands in sharp contrast to the Kaine administration and most Fairfax County board members, who see the rail as a necessary link to the region’s only international airport. It has also been touted as a way to reduce gridlock on major arteries in the Dulles Corridor, especially Interstate 66.

“It is absurd to say that this won’t take one person off the roads,” said Gordon Hickey, spokesman for Gov. Tim Kaine. “Of course people will use it. People in Northern Virginia and Washington have been clamoring for something like this forever.”

The entire debate will be moot, however, if the airports authority can’t secure a vital $900 million in federal funds for the project’s first 11.6-mile phase. The Federal Transit Administration is now considering whether the proposed $2.5 billion first-phase price tag is too expensive to fund for comparatively small number of new riders.

wflook@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:25 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "More riders squeezing onto Metrorail as gas costs force commuters off roads"

Patricia K said:
I realize that more commuters are using the system, and that I am not going to find a seat or avoid skin contact with a sweaty hairy man on a rainy day. I even accept that a couple packed trains will pass me by, lengthening my commute. It is the nauseatingly abrupt start-stop motion and stall-outs at every other stop that I abhor. Are these necessary? My commute has taken on the qualities of a sadistic psychological experiment, designed to see how much I can take without losing my mind. It is by far the most difficult portion of my day, and I know I’m not alone. Suggestions for improvement include adjusting the air conditioning to accommodate sardines at rush hour; stopping completely instead of slamming on the brakes, inching forward, and repeating; and setting an automated speed so that riders aren’t alternately subject to snails and speed demons.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:52 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Alexandria officials tie development to new stations"

Examiner examiner said:
Why does Taryn Luntz accept the estimate of $100 million for a new metrorail station without question? Is she doing her job?

90 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:56 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Va. House speaker has dim hopes for Metrorail extension to Dulles"

Examiner Reader said:
Presently there is only one Metro Bus route that services Dulles. Seems like Metro would set up more routes to Dulles from DC/VA/MD to prove there is a need for the rail. Meanwhile, the taxi industry will continue to bilk the public with $50 plus fares.

150 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:10 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Dulles rail vote draws criticism and praise"

County Resident said:
It's too bad that Supervisor Cathy Hudgins was not willing to wait for a better look at the costs and the risks before voting. Hunter Mill needs Marie Huhtala. This eyesore might also force real estate tax increases and compete with schools, parks and public safety for county revenue. We need a new county board of supervisors.

230 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:54 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 6, 2007 re: "Rail issue a focal point in election year"

Examiner Reader said:
The County is being burdened with an uncapped 16.!% of costs, which is guaranteed to rise, as the contract is structured. Worse yet the County has not even seen the Contract documents. Even to see a redacted version a week for a major vote on a $3 B project, this is not displaying fiscal prudence on the part of the County stewards. It is not only that the best option is not getting built, but the Stewards of the County have been quite deficient. The County residents are being asked to pay increasing taxes every year, however, the Supervisors have not demonstrated fiduciary responsibility, while relegating the decision making to other bodies , such as the State, MWAA and others. A case in point is that the State's obligations are capped at $75M, while the County pays 5 times as much and claims to have no say in the decision making process ! Actually we are being asked to pay more than more than $800 million, along with any increases that the cartel decides to make.

295 agree | 272 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:18 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Board may stall rail vote unless contract delivered"

Carl Lundie said:
The concept to deliver the Dulles Rail through Tysons can be "state of the art " and a place to be admired for many years to come. I have 3 questions 1) How is it possible the contractor (DPT) Dulles Transit Partners after reaching an agreement with (MWAA) Metropolitan Washington Aiports Authority and the Commonwealth of VA. to build Phase 1 on March 30, 07 a contract has not been delivered, reviewed with due diligence? 2) Who has control over the decision process ? The (DPT) set the 19 June as the vote date. Dana Kauffman, a board member asked the question Monday June 4,07. 3) Is contract expiration date June 20 or August 1,07

277 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:05 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Rail issue a focal point in election year"

US Grant said:
Lynda Smyth and Gerry Connolly have got to go! They do not give a damn about constituents - only turning Fairfax and Tysons into an urban slum. It is time for people top take back the governments, local and state, and do what is right. The Tysons project is a fisaco thanks to those purported elected leaders currnently in power. Get them out - retire them!

277 agree | 260 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:36 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "FTA rejects underground rail route"

E.S. said:
Common Sense: Apparently you don't realize that by having rail go right down the toll road and straight out to the airport you'd be bypassing Tysons and lowering the ridership numbers that would be required to receive certain levels of federal and local funding for Metrorail in any form. Ridership numbers are extremely important to the approval of funding. Under your plan, you'd still need to have buses shuttling people to their jobs and homes in Tysons Corner (especially after the master plan for Tysons Corner to include more mixed-use is implemented) which would tax the transit system in other ways. Riders want convenient and direct access to their destinations without having to switch forms of transit. This is clearly evidenced by airline travel. Direct = convenient. Especially in the rapid pace of Northern Virginia and the Washington, DC area.

278 agree | 271 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:48 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "FTA rejects underground rail route"

Common Sense said:
It's time to pull the plug on rail through Tysons. Put the Silver Line back in the median of the Dulles Toll Road. That way, we get rail to Dulles, without risking such huge cost overruns. This plan would avoid the ugly El and the huge increases in density for Tysons Corner landowners that would likely add even more traffic to our roads.

776 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:29 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Review of Metrorail plan delayed again"

E.S. said:
I guess the roadside banner photo says it all. Delays. Wouldn't it be nice if they'd just open up competition so we could get an honest shake on the deal? Instead the little secret trimmings here and there to get costs down may just jeopardize Metro coming to Dulles altogether.

268 agree | 231 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:42 PM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "Citizens group blasts secrecy of Dulles rail"

Surprised - Not said:
Gee I wonder where Gerry Connolly was when the Examiner called! Probably conducting county business in private.

295 agree | 267 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 26, 2007 re: "Panel to pick Dulles rail station art"

E.S. said:
Marcia McAllister states in your article: “It is the goal of the Metrorail Project, working with [the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority], to identify talent and artists who can really create pieces that really speak to the environment, that speak to Tysons [Corner], that speak to Reston,” she said. I have only this response to Ms. McAllister's statement: Has your panel of judges for the proposed artwork at stations taken into consideration that the art most appropriate for the Tysons Corner "environment" with an elevated rail is referred to as "graffiti". It has "worked" in many other cities. I believe, as do others in our area, the grafitti artists who offer their creative expressions aren't exactly going to do a formal submission of their work to a judging/review panel for your approval nor will they feel that they need to restrain their creative expression or limit their subject matter to happy clouds and trees. There will plenty of art for all of us to judge.

544 agree | 268 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)