Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Birds death toll continues climb following oil spill

Nov 26, 2007 3:00 AM (372 days ago) by John Upton, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Despite the efforts of rescue workers, the bird death toll from the Nov. 7 Cosco Busan oil spill continues to climb. Over the Thanksgiving weekend, some 173 local and migratory birds were found dead.
(Jason Steinberg/Special to The Examiner)
Despite the efforts of rescue workers, the bird death toll from the Nov. 7 Cosco Busan oil spill continues to climb. Over the Thanksgiving weekend, some 173 local and migratory birds were found dead.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Fuel spilled from the Cosco Busan more than two weeks ago continued its carnage of San Francisco Bay wildlife over the Thanksgiving weekend, with 173 local and migratory birds killed or found killed, taking the grim death toll Sunday to 2,125 birds and a harbor seal.

Hundreds of trained volunteers and workers have collected and rescued birds affected by oil after the Cosco Busan scraped against a Bay Bridge tower Nov. 7, which led to a 58,000-gallon spill of low-grade shipping fuel.

Of the 2,647 birds collected as of Sunday, 2,125 were dead and 188 had been released, according to official figures. Another 334 were being cleaned and rehabilitated by hopeful rescue workers, although many of those will also die.

Birds can freeze to death when they’re covered with oil because their feathers lose insulating properties, and they can die after they eat or ingest the toxic sludge.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Birds of threatened and endangered species have been killed, said Sylvia Wright of the Oiled Wildlife Care Network at UC Davis, including three marbled murrelets, two brown pelicans and a snowy plover.

Just 2,300 tiny snowy plovers live and breed on West Coast beaches, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

Figures provided by Wright paint a gloomy picture around the Bay, which is a popular stop for birds as they migrate along the Pacific Flyway between Alaska and Chile.

According to Wright’s figures, birds from 57 species have been found dead by the end of last week, including more than 300 surf scoters. Eighty thousand of the 18-inch black and brown ducks call the Bay home during winter, according to researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey.

More than 200 Western grebes have also been killed, according to Wright. The ducks, which have pointy beaks and swanlike necks, are found from Mexico to Canada, and they nest in plants on the Bay during spring and summer.

Scoters and grebes are “especially susceptible” to the fuel, Golden Gate Audubon Society Executive Director Elizabeth Murdock said, because “they spend a lot of time in the Bay — they dive to the bottom of the Bay to feed on crustaceans.”

Birds and other wildlife will continue to be harmed by the fuel long after cleanup crews have gone home, Murdock warned, as toxins from the fuel build up in their prey.

“Having a crisis like the oil spill just puts additional stress on these birds,” she said. “They both have suffered population declines over the last few decades.”

Species most frequently killed by the spill

» Surf scoters

» Western grebes

» Common murres

» Western grebes and Clark’s grebes

» Brandt’s cormorants

» Greater scaups

» Eared grebes

Source: Oiled Wildlife Care Network

jupton@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:17 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 29, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan owners pay $80M to leave"

Examiner Reader said:
Examiner Reader said: The ship's destination was QINQDAO (Tsingtao), China, not Korea as reported above. 7 agree | 6 disagree Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree How does one disagree with a statement of provable fact?

153 agree | 143 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:12 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 29, 2007 re: "Tests show Bay water is clean"

Examiner Reader said:
"Additionally, state officials said that tests conducted by a California Department of Fish and Game biologist last week that found what seemed to be oil found in local herring fisheries were “inclusive,” according to Lt. Rob Roberts of the Department of Fish and Game’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response." Perhaps "inconclusive" was intended

130 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:56 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan owners pay $80M to leave"

Examiner Reader said:
The ship's destination was QINQDAO (Tsingtao), China, not Korea as reported above.

162 agree | 166 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:23 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "Group turns oil into food for ’shrooms"

Examiner Reader said:
The Coast Guard did not turn away the Fire Department boat that came to investigate. That is false. The Coast Guard did, inform them of the 100 yard safey zoen around the Cosco Busan after the incident occurred. The statement implies that the Coast Guard is covering up this incident, which is ridiculous.

197 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:30 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 11, 2007 re: "Bay spill lawsuits pour in"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey, SFoff, I live in SF and yes my county did fail miserably in their response. I just wonder if Dennis Herrera is really going to believe that he will get 25K for each day of the spill from Captain Cota.

141 agree | 145 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:50 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

SFoff said:
Dear Examiner reader (first grade level, apparently)12:40pm. There was no mention of S.F. being the only county affected by the spill. The article was from a San Francisco Newspaper, regarding San Francisco's response to the oil spill. Not very obscure. It's all clear in context. Nobody was wondering why SF. "was not kept in the loop". He is questioning why S.F. did not enter the loop of it's own accord, considering how much "training and partnership" had been established. Are we supposed to be happy with our particular cities response because your county also failed miserably to do anything in time to prevent this problem? And BTW, S.F. is not the center of the Universe, just the Solar System, but thanks for the exaggeration!

161 agree | 172 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:40 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
... and San Francisco was the only city, the only county affected by this spill. It seems that SF is to self-centered in this incident, wondering why it was not kept in teh loop. It seems that many other cities and counties were affected by this incident. way to go SF. Show you true colors. If ross Mirkirami wants to be mayor in 2012 then he should just come out and proclaim that San Francisco is in fact, the center of the universe. Then he will get my vote

164 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
Seems strange that we would be knocking ourselves up for something we had little control over and had misleading info about. One would think you can rely on the Coast Guard to provide accurate info, since this IS their jurisdiction, but to get the info wrong hours later and even when others are pointing out that it's a LARGE spill (and to ignore this emergency) seems unconscionable. This, to me, should be about the ship crashing into the bridge tower and the bungled response of the Coast Guard, their effect on the greater Bay Area and effective preventive measures.

163 agree | 146 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:34 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 29, 2007 re: "Waters now safe, fishing to resume"

Examiner Reader said:
Its my understanding two-thirds of the 58,000 gallons of oil is unaccounted for and will remain so. The water quality of San Francisco Bay was questionable before this event. Some sort of blanket statement regarding the "safeness" of the bay water seems a bit dubious to me.

322 agree | 171 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 29, 2007 re: "Bay Bridge bumper bits lost"

Examiner Reader said:
Having said that black made it harder to find the missing pieces of plastic lumber, they're going to use black again for the replacement?!! Foolish.

396 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007 re: "Birds death toll continues climb following oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
Very self indulgent of you to equate an oil spill dead birds and your situation. Get over it already.

250 agree | 190 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement