Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
In the next room, dozens of signs reading, “Thank God for Dead Soldiers” and “God Hates Fags” lean against the wall, waiting for the Phelps family’s next military funeral protest.
In the living room, Shirley Phelps-Roper, one of 13 children of the Rev. Fred Phelps, founder of the Westboro Baptist Church, sits on a green couch, a King James Bible resting on her lap.
She has just led most of her 11 children in a Scripture reading and enthusiastically agrees to an interview. She’s appeared five times on Fox News, done radio interviews with stations from around the world and recently appeared on a BBC documentary about the Phelps that dubbed them “America’s most-hated family.”
“This tiny little church plunked down in the middle of the country has got the whole nation in an uproar,” says Phelps-Roper, 50.
“It’s amazing. Who could write that scenario?”
A federal jury in Baltimore recently decided the church must pay nearly $11 million to Albert Snyder because Westboro members protested the Westminster funeral of his son, Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder, who died in Iraq. The jury found the church members inflicted emotional distress and invaded the privacy of the father in a decision that raised Westboro’s profile.
“Now the nation is talking; it hasn’t slowed down at all,” Phelps-Roper says.
“Every day, all manner of people – professors, law schools, lawyers, editorials, newspapers all over the country – are all talking about what this means for the First Amendment.”
The fundamentalist fringe group revamped its Web site, posted new movies explaining its inflammatory protest signs and created music videos with lyrics exhorting its anti-gay message, which are then picked up on YouTube.
“Every one of these is a vehicle,” says Phelps-Roper, who runs the day-to-day operations of the church on behalf of her 78-year-old father.
“We ask, ‘What can we do to get their attention?’ ‘What can we do to make this nation understand that if you are going to go the way of Sodom and Gomorrah, you will suffer their fate?’”
But preaching hate on the sidewalks of America – the church has organized about 33,000 protests since 1991 – often attracts the ire of the public and sometimes, the handcuffs of police.
While picketing a military funeral in Nebraska this summer, Phelps-Roper was arrested and charged with desecration of an American flag and child abuse after her 10-year-old son, Jonah, stood on a flag. Jonah, and brothers Noah, 8, and Gabriel, 12, and sisters Megan, 21, and Grace, 14, watched as police cuffed their mother and placed her in the back seat of a cruiser.
Several days later, Jonah cried and said, “If the police just would have told us not to step on the flag, we wouldn’t have.”
Phelps-Roper is still fighting the charges and believes the incident was a police set-up organized to discourage the family from protesting.
“If the cops are so concerned for the children’s welfare, they wouldn’t have taken their mother and left them there,” she says as the sound of her boys playing echoes in the other room.
“I’m sure that experience has kind of made Jonah grow up.”
Her children have traveled to almost all the states for protests, some since they were in strollers, to spread their belief that soldiers die in Iraq as God’s punishment for America’s acceptance of gays.
At protests, angry observers yell, threaten violence and in 1993, struck some of the church members. Someone targeted the church with a homemade bomb in 1995, and after the recent trial in Baltimore concluded, someone left firecrackers and spray-painted the church in red, writing, “God hates the Phelps.” The phone rings off the hook, mostly from people who call family members crazy.
Coming from such an infamous family has made the children, who all attend or graduated from public schools, a target of classmates and teachers, Phelps-Roper says.
One teacher called home to find out why Sam Phelps-Roper, her oldest, didn’t want to participate in the school’s Christmas party. The family refuses to celebrate holidays as a display of its disgust for America.
The church’s children aren’t allowed to date, a stance that doesn’t seem to bother Megan Phelps-Roper, a senior at nearby Washburn University.
“I wouldn’t want to date anyone I go to school with anyway. They are self-centered and ignorant of the Bible,” says Megan, who wears Airwalk moon boots and a sparkly scarf.
Class discussions at her college sometimes turn to religion, but Megan says her ability to quote the Bible usually helps fend off would-be bullies. She considers her cousins and other church members her friends. She and her siblings don’t typically invite classmates over to the house, save for the occasional school project.
Not everyone has been content enough to stay Westboro members. More than 30 members, both those related and not related to the Phelps family, have left the church in the past two years.
Some of those who left in the “exodus,” Phelps-Roper says, were asked to leave because they broke church rules.
Today, about 70 people, most related to the family, regularly attend the weekly Sunday services.
Church members have left because as the apocalypse draws near, Phelps-Roper says, God separates the wheat from the chaff, borrowing from a parable in the Bible.
Topeka residents are accustomed to seeing Westboro’s protests, particularly in Gage Park, where Fred Phelps claims he first mounted the pickets two decades ago because two gay men allegedly approached his then-6-year-old grandson, Josh.
At a local coffee shop, a flier advertising a counter-protest group hangs on a bulletin board, reading: “Hey Liberals of Kansas! Tired of seeing our streets littered with hateful picket signs? Then do something about it!”
Sitting nearby, Topeka native Lonny Honeycutt shares his single complaint about the clan.
“The only thing they do wrong is have little kids involved,” he says.
“How is that right?”
But Phelps-Roper vows to press on with her children at her side, saying God will protect them.
Asked if the protests, flights across the country and confrontations with almost everyone she encounters ever grow so intense that she wants to walk away, tears swell in her eyes.
“There are so many lying, false prophets,” she says.
“It’s so sad. Sometimes, that’s what’s so hard. Albert Snyder says he feels bad for my children. But my children are alive and well and serving God.”
kvolkmann@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:49 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Judge orders lien on Westboro church"
Report as inappropriate
9:15 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 7, 2008
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
3:53 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "Judge orders Westboro church to pay $5 million"
Report as inappropriate
5:36 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "Judge orders Westboro church to pay $5 million"
Report as inappropriate
4:54 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "Judge orders Westboro church to pay $5 million"
Report as inappropriate
9:02 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 27, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
7:16 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
4:31 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
10:49 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
9:45 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
6:40 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
5:17 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Phelps children raised on faith"
Report as inappropriate
4:55 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 15, 2007
re: "Experts: High court likely to reject Kan. church’s appeal of $11M ruling"
Report as inappropriate
10:41 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 3, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
7:37 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 3, 2007
re: "Father’s attorneys want to investigate Westboro Baptist Church’s finances"
Report as inappropriate
7:22 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 3, 2007
re: "Father’s attorneys want to investigate Westboro Baptist Church’s finances"
Report as inappropriate
1:41 PM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Father’s attorneys want to investigate Westboro Baptist Church’s finances"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Father’s attorneys want to investigate Westboro Baptist Church’s finances"
Report as inappropriate
9:56 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Phelps’ son speaks out"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Fred Phelps’ estranged son speaks out"
Report as inappropriate
7:01 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Fred Phelps’ estranged son speaks out"
Report as inappropriate
6:24 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Fred Phelps’ estranged son speaks out"
Report as inappropriate
3:41 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Fred Phelps’ estranged son speaks out"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 2, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
2:14 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
2:03 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
1:41 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
1:26 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
8:22 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
6:06 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Jury: Westboro must pay $10.9 million"
Report as inappropriate
10:17 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "Westboro calls key witness"
Report as inappropriate
2:29 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Westboro defends protests at fallen troops’ funerals"
Report as inappropriate
7:20 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
8:32 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
11:21 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 24, 2007
re: "Judge dismisses defamation claim against gay-bashing church"
Report as inappropriate
6:53 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
6:05 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Fallen soldier’s family hopes lawsuit cripples fringe church"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
8:49 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Fallen soldier’s family hopes lawsuit cripples fringe church"
Report as inappropriate
8:27 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
8:17 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
7:39 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Fallen soldier’s family hopes lawsuit cripples fringe church"
Report as inappropriate
7:36 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
7:23 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
6:38 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
6:26 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "Westboro brings protest to city"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 18, 2007
re: "Fallen soldier’s family hopes lawsuit cripples fringe church"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
"Phelps-Roper submitted to the court her income tax returns from last year, which showed she earned about $20,000 as a part-time lawyer. She and her husband have a home with about $175,000 in equity, and they donated about $64,000 to the church last year, Bennett said". WHERE did the 64 grand come from??? These vile evil toads need to be sued into oblivion. The are the church of hate, and are as evil as our worst enemies. The "Reverend" Wright said G*D D*mn America?...how 'bout damning THESE creeps???
10 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Megan does not date and "considers her cousins and other church members her friends". "Today, about 70 people, most related to the family, regularly attend the weekly Sunday services." Now, let's analyze the above... inbreeding explains their small brains. Only God should judge us, and He created every one of us. How dare they hurt those sad people attending funerals so that they can be in the spotlight and have a little fame. This is not Christianity as taught at any of the churches I have ever attended. This sounds like pure evil to me.
45 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think they are terrorist and should be delt with in the same matter as Al Quada. I have know problem with people protesting but when it comes to funnerals I draw the line. My fellow Marine rest in peace and justice will be served by the courts.
66 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Lets all get together and kick there arses!!LLOL
60 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm a former Marine SSgt and it makes me sick to my stomach to see these people protest at the funerals of fallen Marines or any brach of the services. If they like god so much maybe they should have a mass suicide that way they can meet he sooner than later.
65 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
RDH said:
Just another example of idiots using the media to further themselves!!!!!!!!!!
96 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bill said:
One of the worst articles I have ever read. Can the Examiner show the Phelps in a more positive light? Anyone who doesn't realize that these people are idiots seaking publicity needs to have their head examined. Can you imagine how bad of a parent you have to be to raise your children to protest at a funeral - a time for the parents, family and friends to morn the loss of their son, and loved one. These protests are beyond barbaric and the court and jury agree. The Sun did a good article on how hated these people are and these protsts are just one more step in their idiotic antics, and ignoring them hasn't made them go away. If it makes any difference I am an Independent that has always been against the Iraq war; I currently have 2 relatives in Iraq, and 2 other currently home but headed back. They are all really super, great, average type people - like by all that know them. The Phelps - are and should be hated, fined, and the adults put in jail till they learn civility.
88 agree | 64 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Chris Plummer said:
What the hell is this article's purpose? It reads like a puff-piece spotlight in some society page.. Since when do these people warrant a look into what it is like at the homestead? Children playing amongst hateful protest signs? It's so nice to read they are playing on Xboxes. Why not also give us a tour of their bathrooms that have indoor plumbing. This whole Phelps thing is being fueled by the press, and this is further proof of it. These jerks would just disappear in the mist if the newspapers and TV news shows wouldn't be giving them free advertising and promotions.
116 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
more sick en tired then all............... said:
Getting the hell out of Dodge,(Maryland) wipe the slate clean and start a new beginning; Exodus sounds like a great idea. Leave it all behind!!!!!!!!!!
91 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jeff, an Independent said:
If you don't like America, then get out!
103 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, these kids will grow up to be real outstanding citizens.
113 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Where are all the Republicans spouting "If you don't like America, than get out" ...or do they only say that to liberals???
116 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You people are missing the point. The church was NEVER denied the right or venue to speak, so their rights were not violated. The first amendment DOES NOT protect them from financial damages caused by thier speech. YOu will pay a fine if you yell fire in a theater. you can still do it, but you will pay a fine.
121 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I disgree with hating people. God loves everyone, even the sinners, he just wishes that those sinners would be like the prodigal son and come back to him. God doesn't like it when people become judgemental and don't submit to an earthly government. Do you remember the Bible verse, "love you neighbor as yourself"? If you are saying that gay people are (what ever you call it) and you destroy other people's property then what does that say to people about when you come to them in the name of the Lord? You don't win people over saying cusses and that thier going to hell you show them compasion like Christ did. Jesus' words, "Anyone who hasn't sinned, shall cast the first stone" means everyone has sinned, so no one is perfect and we do not make the decion of who goes to hell or not, thats God's decion. What our job as Christians should be is to be ambassadors of Christ and spread the good news to those who are lost. "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good" Romans
129 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let us call it quits; the way to do it is from now on you and these people have never met. That way if you should meet these people in public it will be acceptable to act as if you do not know them. It will keep the peace. You are free from any wrongs and so are they and myself. It is best this way, for all involved. People can go their own way to their own church without any condemnation. No acknowledgment in a public place, prefer that separate places continue to avoid running into these people, I do it as a courtesy and expect the same consideration. Nothing exist, no forgiveness, there is nothingness, but hatred and revenge.
119 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"To be a true Christian you must have love for everyone just as God loves them. The only thing God hates is sin." You should practice what you preach; God does "HATE FAKE CHRISTIANS." He will also judge them. Seeking revenge, spreading rumors. Participating in gossip, and divulging private information that someone has trusted you with, is a SURE SIGN OF IMMUNTURITY, SLANDERER, HATERS OF THOSE THAT DO GOOD, AND NOT CHRIST-LIKE BEHAVIOR. Are you so filled with revenge that almost every waking moment you are devising evil against that person?? So much filled with revenge that you will not forgive them, even when they have asked you to forgive?? So filled with revenge that you have involved outside resources to act on your behalf to fulfill your revenge???? Sorry, brother these are all markings of a fake believer. You can quote any scripture but when you live in a state of mind such as revenge and hatred filled you are not in the Christian race.
129 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"I disagree with what they stand for and feel that they are intentionally inflicting emotional distress upon me as I have had a family member murdered by a person currently on death row." Then make your as the fallen Marine's father did and, if a jury agrees with your 'feelings', then take the award and donate it to the ACLU--or the Westboro Church.
128 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
They were not inciting violence. They were expressing a view that is unpopular with the majority; some of whom might respond to that message with violence completely of their own volition. Assembly permits are not required for small groups on public access streets as such a requirement would be chilling on free speech. I see groups of anti-death penalty protesters all the time in Baltimore. I disagree with what they stand for and feel that they are intentionally inflicting emotional distress upon me as I have had a family member murdered by a person currently on death row. While I would be more than happy to file a lawsuit to bankrupt whatever organization those people belong to, I recognize that in a free country they have a right to their views.
107 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These fools are inciting violence. Thats what this will lead to. Also do they have a permit for their gathering?
109 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The only reason the jury found for the plaintiff is emotion not logic. If Westboro had been protesting outside a school, private home, church service, or Presidential ranch at Crawford, TX this case would have been thrown out. It is reprehensible what this group does and stands for, but they have a right to an opinion not expressed by the majority of others. This case HAS to be overturned as it will open the floodgates to every claim of infliction of emotional distress due to speech. It is distressing, but it protects a constitutional republic. If this ruling is allowed to stand, then NO speech is protected since there will always be someone who can claim "intent to cause emotional distress". Westboro did not call for sedition or for violence against others; infliction of emotional distress is not an exclusion to free speech protections. A higher court will overturn this verdict.
100 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let me know when one of these brainwashed idiots dies so i can attend their funeral with signs
126 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wallace said:
As a gay man, I think that freedom of speech is very important. Though I do think that it should be reserved for "proper use". I understand firsthand, by the Church and its intolerence of me and people like me, a person that has never hurt anyone. I also see this as an opportunity for people to see the Church for exactly what they are, and put a face to their message, "God hates us, and we are his enemy." My brother is serving in the military, and I was a police officer for my community, sacrificing my life for my community, but from the view of the Church, I am hated by a loving god?!?! We (gay people) need to see this, and understand that religion is not haven of love and protection. You cannot be yourself, you must live a lie to be loved by the church and their god. I am proud to be American, and glad that our forefathers worked to protect everyone in this country, regardless of faith or lack of it. I am glad that they even worked to protect those church people's hate speech.
114 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Undertaker said:
I'm all for free speech, but that is not without limits. Intruding on a funeral (especially for a private citizen) to make your argument is extreme and I'm glad that these people are finally being held accountable.
110 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"At its core, these actions are all protected by our freedom of speech laws." So said one lawyer wannabe below. First, Clarence Darrow, there are limits placed on free speech, even in public places. Go ahead and incite people to violently overthrow our government or take a seat in a movie theater and yell "Fire!" when there is none. More importantly, the jury's award was clearly driven by its finding that the Westboro Gang intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the fallen Marine's father. That, and not free speech, was at the heart of this matter. So, go watch another crime drama on TV and, during commercials, pick up a law book and skim through it. You just might learn something.
111 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don't count on that judgement being overturned. I hope it brings down all of them from that church. It was a taunting protest provoking a response. I think society is getting tired of these so called "peaceful demonstrations." This may be the first of many to fall. It is long over due. I would be pretty comfortable in saying that when our "rights" were formed that demonstrations like this were not intended or expected. It's probably not in the spirit of the writings. People like to shield themselves under the so called rights but, as we learn over time, everything has it's limits. Also, learn the Fed system. A federal jury can be made of of people throughout the state, not just people from Baltimore.
117 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gay in San Jose said:
If GOD didn't want me here because of my hosexuality, then he'd take me out, well I'm still here, partnered and with teenage children, and I a bad person??? I think not. I couldn't be happier with my life, so accept it people, we're not going anywhere anytime soon.
142 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If animal rights activists can protest right outside a person's home, is that not an "invasion of privacy"? If reporters tail a "celebrity" all day, is that not an "invasion of privacy"? While the Westboro church is a terrible one, it is the price one pays for living in a free society. The judgment against them will be overturned. Breaking down the case into its barest elements: it was a non-violent protest on public land near a private event. This is clearly protected by free speech laws, which a jury of Baltimoreans clearly did not understand. Once it reaches the appellate level it will be overturned. They did not go into the funeral and thus there can be no invasion of privacy. It would have been the same if the NAACP protested at a KKK event or if the KKK protested at an NAACP event. At its core, these actions are all protected by our freedom of speech laws.
144 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's not a freedom of speech issue. It was however an "invasion of privacy" issue and an intentional infliction of emotional distress . The portion of the law suit over free speech and right to gather was tossed out. What this church does it disgusting. I would not be so civil if they protested at my family members funeral. They're sense of reality is warped. They contradict so many aspects of the bible by their actions.
113 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is disgusting - first amendment rights give these people the ability to protest no matter how tasteless one might take it to be. Just another example of our rights being whittled away by the left.
106 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Since the father has repeatedly stated that his win is not a victory about money- I hope that he does the right thing and donates his win to VA hospitals and familes of other killed/wounded soldiers. Use the money wherever it is needed...
113 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who is the quack psychiatrist witness. Is he saying anger and depressioon are not related?
114 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
m johnson said:
My bible says nothing about Noah being mocked (I think that is in a movie somewhere). It just says that the world was filled with violence and God's way was being interrupted by wickedness. It says God did away with the flesh accept Noah and his family who were righteous and the clean and the unclean animals and promised never to send another flood. The Westboros have done a lot of taking for gospel what their leaders tell them instead of actually studying what the bible, as a whole, is trying to say. And what of Noah? when the flood ends he builds an altar to thank God, plants a vineyard and then goes and gets drunk. Genesis 9:21. What a role model! They should be comparing themselves to Jeremiah or Elijah not Noah. Now those guys were REALLY unpopular.
180 agree | 136 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This church is not a baptist church. They should be kicked out of the baptist church. What a disservice to a fallen hero,who died so they my live. Paul A. Davis longview texas
121 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Renee from Baltimore said:
I think a lot of us are missing the mark on this. We are not here to decide whether or not homosexuality is "right or wrong." Whether or not you agree with and/or accept homosexuality- ANY person can see what these protestors are doing is wrong. Morally and ethically. They are protesting at a funeral. This is families' and friends' time to gain closure and say good-bye. This is a private moment that should be available for decent memories not memories that evoke feelings of despairation. It does not matter what message the protestors are trying to get across, what matters is that their platform is totally uncalled for and should be banned- not just them sopecifically but anyone who would be heartless enough to protest ANYONE'S funeral. Please don't get stuck on the issue of homosexuality- the issue here is the respect of a deceased individual and their family.
140 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Volveus said:
I think Shirley Phleps Roper dying is gods way of saying stop smearing my words and the judge is a douschebag
141 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This Westboro Church is totally wrong. Yes the bible teaches against Homosexuality, but it also preaches against Hatred and Racism. CRL's Pastor by no means condones Homosexuality, I've sat through several sermons where he denounced Homosexuality. In fact CRL,is one of the few Mega Churches in the City, where you hear a Pastor take a stance against Homosexuality. Westboro needs to do some better research before they randomnly pick churches, that actually have the same beleifs. I love my homosexual brothers and sisters, but I love my God more, and his word says that it is sinful to live a homosexual lifestyle.
125 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
where are these animals staying in baltimore? they should take a walk in some of less desireable areas of the city. most of the city.
122 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Westboro Baptist Church is an embarrassment to the human race. Picketting outside a fallen soldiers funeral is about as low as you can go. People should picket outside of their church during their services.
140 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am kinda happy that this is the face of religion smeared on the television sets. Just like the mormons condoning marriage to children to justify pedophillia, and the Catholic church molesting little boys and being sent to Rome to cover it up. Just like the Jewish Rabbis sucking on little boys privates after circumcision giving them syphillis, just like the treatment of women as property in Islam, and condoning castrating them to deny them enjoyment of what is natural. Religion is being exposed for what it really is. This is religion and the face of it. I am afraid of those people, very afraid!
118 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
S. Ford said:
Nowhere in the Bible does it say that believers are to condemn others; judgment, and vengeance, are left entirely to God. We are to do *good*, to love each other, to gently confront others -- in love -- only when necessary; to remove the beam in our own eye before we remove the speck from someone else's. Hate such as that which is demonstrated here is not from God, and is not right in any sense. Hate comes from evil, not ever from good. The real shame, however, is that the young people in this perverse and lost family are indoctrinated into a lifestyle which apparently focuses on the paranoid persecution of strangers rather than learning how to do right, and be right with God and with one's fellow human being. Finally, it is highly instructive when "one doth protest too much." This often happens when one him- or her- self is actually guilty of that which is so vigorously rejected.
145 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Hillary Clinton (D) NY said:
Wait till the College Republican gets out of school and has to go to work and pay his taxes, Lets see how he will feel then. He's just not worldly enuff yet.
119 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
all I can say is WOW. I saw them on the news and was left speechless. I cannot imagine the reason they provide to themselves to disrupt something as emotional and private as a funeral. And "their God" is ok with that? Wow!...I agree with the previous responders who said that God does not hate, an calling them a "religion" is way too generous. WE need to pray for THEM!
129 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thankfully, people are not as dumb as they were decades ago, and don't fall for this chicanery of a religion anymore.
130 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
College Republican is as naive as they come.
120 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wallace said:
The death of religion, and the birth of reason is officially in full effect! Reason isn't steeped in hate, racism, classcism, or any other ism. Hopefully the day will come when we can see all religion for what it really is, and start to view our world with reason and humanism...
114 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
The back of their signs say vote for Hillary, because these nut jobs think that a large part of voters are stupid, and will automatically think that Hillary supports them...Reverse psychology going on here. But voters are more informed than at any other time in history, particularly after this last administration. We know that Hillary has no part of this and they are largely Republicans. This is clearly representative of the Republican "base"...how sick is that. Once I found out that they, and other groups like them were part of the Republican "base", it was no way I could be a part of that party. I am happy to say I switched back to Democrat, and will vote for Hillary! The only good that comes out of groups like this, is to look at the people holding the pitchforks,OOPS, signs. Look at their faces. Our children need to see this, and they can maybe understand why they have to pull their pants up and get educated. Hate and racism is alive, and it is usually associated with trash!
123 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sorry loser College Republican, these are you "conservative" right-wing religio-fundamental ilk. Try again.
107 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
College Republican said:
The lunatic fringe,...once again clawing for something to believe in. These are the people who make up a large portion of the kook base of the Democrats. The back of their signs says "Vote Hillary."
142 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
God does not hate.
131 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Religion the scourge of the earth...and I mean all of them. How many people have been beaten, deprived, mutilated, hung, burned at the stake, beheaded, and had countries over-run and destroyed...All in the name of religion and some "loving" god. Shame on you mankind
149 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree