Targeting gunfire would cost $400K
Article History
This is the latest version.
Authorities may soon be able to track shots fired in The City.
(AP file photo)
Authorities may soon be able to track shots fired in The City.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Struggling to bring down the homicide rate and gun violence, The City is turning to a high-tech gadget that will immediately alert law enforcement when a gun is fired and figure out the location of the shooter within seconds — as thousands of shots are fired in San Francisco every year.

San Francisco would follow other cities, such as Oakland and Redwood City, which have implemented ShotSpotter technology, which uses acoustic sensors to detect shots fired and the location. The City wants to roll out the technology as a pilot program in the crime-plagued Western Addition and the Bayview. It would detect gunfire in approximately a 1-square-mile area in each neighborhood.

The pilot program would cost The City $400,000. The Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee will vote Wednesday on whether to approve the expenditure. If approved, the system would be operational within 60 to 90 days.

In September, Mayor Gavin Newsom threw his support behind the plan, saying “lives can be saved.” Newsom noted that 85 percent of last year’s 85 homicides were committed with a gun, up from 60 percent in 2005. The plan comes as The City has seen 90 killings so far this year. Two years ago there were a decade-high 96 slayings.

The ShotSpotter system, made by a Mountain View-based company, is supposed to be able to increase arrest rates and deter gun crimes.

It’s unclear how many guns are fired in San Francisco, but the Police Department receives about 2,300 to 2,400 calls a year reporting shots fired and at best 50 percent of them are reported, said Mikail Ali, acting director of the Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice.

San Francisco General Hospital has reported that the number of gunshot-wound victims treated at its trauma center more than doubled between 2003 and 2006 to nearly 230.

Gang violence and narcotics-related incidents result in guns being fired, and there are occasions of “celebratory” gunfire or people shooting guns who “just want to see how it sounds,” Ali said.

Gunfire related to crime in Oakland decreased by 30 percent since the system was installed there a year ago, according to Ali.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, an advocate of ShotSpotter, said the statistics from the program will help hold law enforcement more accountable as he has heard complaints from constituents that they “always hear gunfire” but there is little response.

Four police sergeant squad cars would be equipped with a detection system that will, within seconds of a shot fired, alert the officer and home in on the location of the shooter. The dispatch service would also be alerted of the shot fired and the location as well as the lieutenants on hand at both the Bayview and Northern District police stations.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

9:30 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 12, 2007 re: "Targeting gunfire would cost $400K"

Examiner Reader said:
The Bayview and Western Addition need a 6pm to 6am curfew, enforced by roving police cars of every agency in SF.

137 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:32 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 12, 2007 re: "Targeting gunfire would cost $400K"

Dave Scott said:
I currently live in Glendale, AZ. The city of Glendale has the same such device. Here in AZ, you often here gunfire in certain areas considering the fact that any person can legally carry a firearm in their possesion. Being here now for 5 years, I have never heard of any arrest being made attributing to this device. Mayor Newsome, spend the money on hiring more officers.

133 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:59 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 12, 2007 re: "Targeting gunfire would cost $400K"

Tyronne Fatsengalla said:
Another after the fact suggestion. The Closed Circuit TV's have notd one bad guy. This 400k will go down the drain. Officers need a D.A.'s Office that will prosecute and an SFPD Command Staff that will back them up. Another complete waste of tax dollars.

158 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:28 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom wants to give high-tech system a shot"

Gretchen said:
While there may be some false positives during the 4th of July, New Year's eve, or Chinese New Year, there is still an opportunity to have faster dispatch to a crime scene which should result in faster emergency treatment for victims and an increased probability of catching the criminals responsible. While I agree that the police already receive phone calls when shots are fired, I also know from experience (I live in the Mission) that it is difficult to know where the sound came from. Technology to pinpoint the exact location of the shots will help police be more responsive and can help save lives. True, there is no panacea for violent crime, but technology and other strategies can be useful in reducing crime and saving lives. I just hope they expand it to include the Mission district.

162 agree | 167 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:03 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom wants to give high-tech system a shot"

Examiner Reader said:
"50% of gunshots go unreported" seems to fly in the face of the mayor's crime data.

167 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:34 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom wants to give high-tech system a shot"

Examiner Reader said:
Ask a dispatcher in Redwood City how well the UGL (urban gunshot locator) works. It goes off when a car backfires or a firecracker goes off. There have been times that a shooting occurs but the UGL didn't register. Because gun violence has gone down in the last 10 years doesn't mean that it is due to a machine that doesn't work as well as a human ear. Police work and prosecution of crime has done that. When a gun is fired the police get plenty of call to tell the police where it occurred. Don't waste your money.

165 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom wants to give high-tech system a shot"

Examiner Reader said:
It's an interesting idea but it doesn't work in urban areas. The homicide rate in urban areas isn't on the rise because the authorities don't know or can't find the people who are being shot. I don't need a shot spotter to tell you where a gun is being fired. In fact when a gun is fired in an urban area the police normally get dozens of calls. Gavin repeat after me...There is no panacea for violent crime...There is no panacea for violent crime...There is no panacea for violent crime! How about this for a start, how about making the carrying of a loaded gun in a public place a felony as opposed to the misdemeanor that it is now. You can't be serious about fighting violent crime while you have laws that give greater penalties for carrying a switchblade than for carrying loaded firearms.

149 agree | 162 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:28 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom wants to give new high-tech system a shot"

Examiner Reader said:
Gavin did you hear something? yes it was the sound of money being fired out the end of a shotgun. Hey if it works in Redwood city and doesn't work in Oakland it must be for us. Like the hit and run drivers and the safest pedestrians this side of Hanoi. Gosh G, we aren't in Kansas anymore.

178 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)