RSS
Home
Which Laker would make the best president?
Print
Email
RSS
Subscribe
Our next president? (AP Photo/Ric Francis)
In case you've been living in a cave for the past year -- actually forget that, even the caves got word of this-- you will be tuning in Tuesday to watch one of the greatest contests in our nation's history.
No, I'm not talking about Phoenix at New Jersey. I'm talking, of course, about the presidential election. Now while Barack Obama and John McCain are both solid candidates, I thought I'd see how some of our very own Lakers might fare as America's next president.
Kobe Bryant
Pros: A natural competitor, Kobe has always been known for his tireless work ethic and refusal to accept mediocrity. In the past couple of years, Kobe has also proven that he can put his personal agenda aside and do what is best for the team.
Cons: His competitive fire often causes him to make rash and ill-advised decisions. Also, questionable choices in his personal life leave Kobe open for attacks on his "moral character."
Electability: 3/10 - Always a polarizing figure, Kobe would easily win California but would lose each of the other 49 states.
Lamar Odom
Pros: Versatile and unselfish, Odom has always been willing to sacrifice personal glory to put the team first. He has also learned to deal with criticism after being chastised mercilessly for the better portion of his career.
Cons: Unfulfilled potential and inability to take a stand could present a problem. His lack of a true position may indicate the "waffling" nature of his decisions while in office. Again, "moral character" may be in question because Odom certainly did inhale.
Electability: 5/10 - Lamar may be a dark horse, as people tend to root for the underdog. Ultimately he doesn't have the charisma to get elected as president. However, now that he has found a home on the bench, he may be better qualified for a position on the Supreme Court.
Luke Walton
Pros: A clean-cut kid who could easily star in the next High School Musical, Walton would easily win the 18-35 vote. Always praised for his "basketball I.Q.," Luke has displayed instincts on the court that could easily carry over to the Oval Office.
Cons: Walton's recent injury problems have raised questions about his toughness. At just 28 years old, Luke hasn't yet proven that he's experienced enough to lead a team on his own.
Electability: 7/10 - Luke's good looks and charm will take him far, but his inexperience will ultimately lead to his downfall. Also, much like Hillary Clinton's campaign, Bill may end up being more of a burden than a benefit.
Derek Fisher
Pros: At 34, Fisher has an impressive resume and is known throughout the league as a team leader. Fisher is a family man that has never gotten into the slightest bit of trouble. In addition, he has already proven that he can thrive in high-pressure situations. At just 6-1, out of the little-known University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Fisher is a true NBA rags-to-riches story.
Cons: Fisher is anything but flashy. His blue-collar mentality on the court may be perceived as anger and coldness.
Electability: 9/10 - Fisher is clearly the Lakers' best candidate. An everyman who knows what it's like to succeed, Fisher has the right combination of credentials and charisma to be the next president of the United States.
Related Articles:
Comments
.jpg)
